Oh yeah I fully agree. This is what happens when you have shareholders and investors that are not gamers. THAT is the core issue. Do gamers really want micro transactions? Do gamers want rushed games? Do gamers want games that can only render at 540 or 960 resolution and require upscaling to even achieve 1080p? No, we want 1080p at a minimum, and most of us want 60 fps at a minimum.Bringing it back to the thread…. You can argue it as you like, but Microsoft WILL sell less consoles now, so their strategy makes little sense beyond Game Pass.
NO decisions have been made to appease gamers for about a decade now. This is purely due to how big the gaming industry has gotten. It is so profitable, that business and financial people are the ones in charge, not true gamers.
Proof of the ex-Ubisoft developers making such a banger of Clair Obscur Expedition 33. This would have NEVER been approved under Ubisoft. Yet it is selling extremely well and the team is very happy. And the game is just incredible, already my game of the year.
Another example, not fair to call it my game of the year since Final Fantasy 7 Rebirth was last year. But I played it for about 2 hours on PS5, the graphics was horrible, and quality mode was 30 FPS which SUCKED. I later got it on PC, I have almost the best PC you can get and it is a stuttering mess. As a gamer, throwing a $4,000 custom PC build....yes custom, should play this game with ZERO issues. This is what gamers want. I loved the game, I really did. But the performance even on my high end PC REALLY frustrated me to no end. Monster Hunter Wilds is another that just is SO BAD performance wise.