That's okay because they only cost $3 on AliExpress in the first placeYour Apple Watch Bands May Not Work With Next Year's Model
That's okay because they only cost $3 on AliExpress in the first placeYour Apple Watch Bands May Not Work With Next Year's Model
The sliding band attachment mechanism wouldn't work with magnets because of how magnets workYou know, it may not be magnetic at all----it may be the same exact connector, with magnetic (or additional pins) to allow the usage of bands that have different functions. Meaning, you could use a "legacy" band, or swap it out for something that monitors blood pressure, for instance.
That, to me, makes far more sense than scrapping the entire band mechanism.
Curious to see what they come up with. If it’s not sturdy it will be a failure…I wouldn’t trust a magnetically attached band during workouts or, even worse, ocean swimming, with my life.
It's a cool device for sure.Well I can only speak for myself, but I love the Apple Watch. Sales seem to imply a lot of others do too.
Frankly, anyone with more than one band (for fashion or whatever reason) are the ones that create waste.So much for pro-environmentalism and minimal waste.
Yeah if they’re just changing it to change it, that’s bad form. New phone design requiring new cases is fine because no one forces people to buy expensive cases, but watch bands are a major part of the watch and are often expensive. A new mechanism needs to be some kind of improvement or allow for some kind of improvement. I’m sure it will, but how much is the question.The new band system must come with serious benefits over the existing one otherwise it will be a big disappointment.
Why do people do this? Keep your Rolex, no one cares. My abacus still works too, but it doesn't stop me from getting a calculator.Well folks, my Rolex I bought in 1966 can have any band still being made today for that design. The difference is that the Rolex still works and does its primary function of displaying time in two time zones along with the date. I doubt any Apple Watch would still be operational in over 50 years let alone 10.
The Apple Watch is, in reality, fad jewelry and disposable when the next fad comes along.
Unlike a phone case which is a separate purchase, you already get to choose the band of your liking when you buy the watch so it's not like they are forcing you to buy additional bands.Yeah if they’re just changing it to change it, that’s bad form. New phone design requiring new cases is fine because no one forces people to buy expensive cases, but watch bands are a major part of the watch and are often expensive. A new mechanism needs to be some kind of improvement or allow for some kind of improvement. I’m sure it will, but how much is the question.
The bands continue to work on the S9. I don’t see the problem. Enjoy the old, embrace the new🤪Unless you were a 1st time buyer with the S9. Then your bands lasted 1 year. How many years was the 3.5mm audio jack around until Apple had the courage to drop it? I think the bands should last that long.
As always, people like you compare Apples to Oranges.Well folks, my Rolex I bought in 1966 can have any band still being made today for that design. The difference is that the Rolex still works and does its primary function of displaying time in two time zones along with the date. I doubt any Apple Watch would still be operational in over 50 years let alone 10.
The Apple Watch is, in reality, fad jewelry and disposable when the next fad comes along.
How??They've really run out of ideas with the watch and are slowly killing it now like they did the iPod.
The iPod had simply been integrated into the iPhones, so it wasn’t required anymore as stand-alone device. Niche scenarios notwithstanding.They've really run out of ideas with the watch and are slowly killing it now like they did the iPod.