Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Your Apple Watch Bands May Not Work With Next Year's Model
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Magnetic attachment? Does this mean that the new watch could be charged by battery powered band also ?
Well folks, my commodore 64 computer can take any floppy disk I throw at it still. you fancy kids with your new laptops don't even have CD drives any more. I feel sorry for all of you.
They do sell watches with default bands - those are what go to apple authorized retailers like Amazon, Best Buy, etc. Only purchases directly through Apple give you the option for different bands, but they are still limited to only what is available that season or at least what they currently have in stock. That excludes the 700+ bands they've already offered over the past ~10 years which, as sales have shown, people are interested in buying separately.
I can tell we’re not going to get anywhere on this track, so let me just go back to the bigger point, which is that changing the band swapping mechanism for no other reason than to make previous bands incompatible would be bad form. Surely, we agree on that. And most likely we agree that Apple is probably not doing it for that reason.
Well if some random person with an anime profile pic tweeted it then it must be true!
You were never promised it would work on future iterations, I mean there’s no print anywhere that will guarantee the thing you buy today it’s gonna work on tomorrows device.
You’re correct. From a business perspective, I think they’ll lose tremendous revenue from the band sales if they do this. The people that have one band are almost certainly not the people buying the most expensive ones. I’d be willing to bet on that guess.
You show that my hundreds of dollars of bands aren’t going to continue to get support, I’m done buying them.
That’s just my opinion.
there are currently 79 different bands offered by Apple (incl Hermes, Ultra etc) - this is a HUGE very profitable business for Apple.
IF they make bands incompatible, that business WILL shrink, plus it will make people (those who change bands very regularly and have like 10 or more bands) re-think to upgrade, regardless of new features.
While all those "technical" reasons have (some) merit, from a business perspective this looks like a dumb move imho
IF they make bands incompatible, that business WILL shrink, plus it will make people (those who change bands very regularly and have like 10 or more bands) re-think to upgrade, regardless of new features.
While all those "technical" reasons have (some) merit, from a business perspective this looks like a dumb move imho
true, but Apple set a precedence for almost 10 years and created an expectation, plus they created a very profitable business for them ...
For their watch that will still work next year. C'mon y'all.
Why would you need magnets then? I guess we'll have to wait and see just what they mean!
That’s a way of seeing it, the other is you had 10 years of the same design to allow also the band switch, which is more than any other Smartwatch creator can claim.
But people will always chose to see things from a negative perspective.
Last edited:
On the contrary, knowing the next band will likely last 5-9 years people might be more willing to shell for a premium band since the beginning knowing it’ll last longer.
Maybe Aw U2 and Series 9 new buyers will not buy the premium band now, but those watches will be suspended from sales soon anyway 😂 at least in the USA, perfect timing.
Well... I'm still using my original Space Black DLC Coated SS band that cost me a butt-load, so I certainly care.
