Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The only thing people can do is… avoid buying it. Apple has to learn this price is utterly ridiculous, the hard way.
Except that the people who will be buying it are pleased that Apple chose to make it at this price point, and not make the sacrifices that some of the other companies have. Some things don't come cheap and they're worth it. Glad to have Apple doing this kind of research and producing with high-end components. It won't be for everyone.
 
And, despite the fact that you, personally, have no use for an iPad, the iPad has been a very successful product.

There is one in the house, set up with a "family" iCloud account, and it's passed around to those who want to use it. Can't share this between people (easily).

I don't think the Vision Pro going to flop, I just think Apple made some very bad choices...
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
There is going to be a downside to using the VP and that is advertisers. There will be some, possible many advertising companies out their licking their lips at the prospect of having a clients advert being shown in full sized glory in a VP. they will find a way to do it, ethics and morals and legality be damned. How many websites will include cookies that will specifically check to see if a VP is connected to the mac machine and if it detects one will then display adverts in all their full large sized glory. At the present moment many website adverts are imbedded into the webpage of the website but what will happen if the website detects a VP is connected, will it have code that will have the website appear as though it has popped out of the webpage and displaying at full size? because we all know advertising companies do not give a damn about us users and the inconvenience their clients adverts can be to us.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: G5isAlive
Those are more subtle and people dont fiddle around with their hands in the air to navigate around something no one else but themselves can see though. Imagine you want to hit play on a movie using your Vision Pro on a plane and suddenly you have your finger stuck into your neighbours nose :D
My understanding is that you don’t have to fiddle around with your hands in the air. You “aim” with your eyes, and then you “click” by tapping your thumb and index finger together wherever your hand happens to be resting. It’s not like Minority Report.

Of course, you won’t be playing Beat Saber on a plane. ;)
 
“This is stupid no one is going to pay $600 for an iPhone”

“Why do I need an iPhone again?”

“The iPhone is not the future and it will flop”.

Steve Balmer: “the iPhone will never be a success”
Tim you’re working hard to push this.

This isn’t the iPhone. Just stop it.

This can be the HomePod. The AirPod max. The Mac Pro.

Is that a bad thing?
 
  • Love
Reactions: arkitect
“This is stupid no one is going to pay $600 for an iPhone”

“Why do I need an iPhone again?”

“The iPhone is not the future and it will flop”.

Steve Balmer: “the iPhone will never be a success”
I was blown away the second I saw the iPhone demoed.

I'm not sure anyone was blown away by this thing.

Even the people who are excited by it don't seem to think it's anything like as revolutionary as the iPhone was.
 
My understanding is that you don’t have to fiddle around with your hands in the air. You “aim” with your eyes, and then you “click” by tapping your thumb and index finger together wherever your hand happens to be resting. It’s not like Minority Report.

Of course, you won’t be playing Beat Saber on a plane. ;)

ah yes, I completely forgot the eye tracking part of Vision Pro
 
I think 3d tvs failed because the overall experience it delivered wasn’t good enough. To be honest 3d movies never delivered that wow factor to me, and that’s because of hardware limitations in the past. I’m hoping this solves that, I think it will.

True, in the cinema on the giant screen 3D worked well, at home, I still have my 42” 3D TV, it felt limited due to the screen size, to me it felt cramped coming out of the small screen, compared to a cinema, I haven’t used the 3D on my TV in years.
 
For my purposes, THIS is the killer app, as relatively simple as it is vs. the great stack of potentials of high resolution VR/AR.

All one needs to do is switch from a large, expansive Mac screen to a relatively tiny 16" or smaller and miss the larger screen R.E. to want a remedy. That remedy is NOT building even bigger laptops, or laptops with screens that fold out... or roll out. For most of those options, it would add a LOT of weight. This doesn't. I envision a new kind of laptop usage here: laptop + Vpro in the bag... and maybe a lidless MB and Vpro in the bag.

And like laptop screens, this is an any-size screen you can summon to use wherever you happen to be. In my case, a major use will be on long flights where cramped seating spaces sometimes doesn't even allow for a laptop to be used in the normal way (can't fully open it at the normal angle to use it).

Bummer that one can't summon multiple Mac screens in the overall view. However, since it is projecting ONE Mac screen and since Mac easily manages multiple screens in Spaces, leave the heavy lifting to Spaces by opening any number of Mac apps across any number of Spaces and then switching to alt Spaces when you want access to those other running apps in the Vpro view. You can basically fake this right now by air-playing a Mac through AppleTV to your big-screen TV. Open up any number of Spaces, run Mac apps in those Spaces and then switch to them via Mission Control as desired. That same thing should work the same way with Vpro (minus the AppleTV need).

Very common apps that I will want to use WITH some Mac apps are Mail, Safari and Messages. Since those are native apps that work fine on iPad, they WILL float next to the one Mac screen. So instead of running them on Mac or on a Mac Space, I'll run the iPad/Vpro versions of them and float them around this Mac screen, switching to and using them as desired and then back to the main workspace. The whole Mac virtual canvas could be owned by some key Mac app while collaboration via texts or email can be flowing around that view... and/or research via web can be done in Safari floating around the view... and/or copy could be polished in the Vpro version of Pages... or calculations fleshed out in the Vpro version of Numbers, etc.

Everyone who wishes for a MB 17" or MB 18" or MB 20" can get a variation of that want met here... along with a MB 24", MB 27", MB 30", MB 40", MB 50", etc. Anyone who has flown and watched the movie on any puny screen (phone, iPad, laptop) and wished they could watch it on a bigger screen, can basically have their biggest big (TV-sized) screen with them in that small seating space too, able to deliver video via this headset, like delivering music in the same setting via headphones.

Since my flights are often LONG ones and 2 hour battery life will not outlast the flight, I anticipate resolving that issue the same way I resolved the very same battery life with my original Powerbook G4: I'll buy & carry a couple of battery packs. If there is a socket on the plane, I'll use it. If not, spare battery packs will make it work until a G4 evolves into an Intel or Silicon (battery life) MB in future versions. My guess is OWC-type players will offer third-party, improved batteries soon after this thing is in the wild.

If it does this one thing really well- that is, it delivers a sharp, super-sized Mac screen for all those situations where having access to an actual larger screen can't work (which is pretty much all situations where I'm using a MB), that's good enough for me, regardless of what else it is able to do. Several of the cheapie, low-resolution ones can already do this at so-so virtual screen quality. Hopefully, 4K-per-eye delivers an outstanding Apple screen quality.

Make no mistake: I do NOT see this as a REPLACEMENT for desktop screens where Vpro becomes my ONLY screen. So all of the collaboration around a screen, etc, issues still get facilitated in traditional setups. However, in all those solo use of laptop scenarios where it's just me hammering out some project, much more screen R.E. will be extraordinarily welcomed. I feel far more productive on my 40" desktop screen than any 16" MB screen. I'm hoping this allows a 40" (or larger) virtual screen to easily go with me when I'm away from desktop settings. No way to easily accomplish that in actual reality (no easily carrying a 40" desktop screen around, balancing it on a tray table, powering it on the airplane, etc). But Vpro will apparently make this easy to do in a relatively light-weight, portable package in the same laptop bag.
That’s a lot of work and extra battery packs JUST to have a larger screen. I recommend checking out XReal’s TRUE AR offerings. You are making a lot of compromises just to convince yourself this devices is needed for you. Also the question is, how long before Apple Vision Pro’s are BANNED on flights due to the inability of the wearer to pay attention to safety of themselves and others on a flight? Noise cancellation headphones are one thing but a person not being able to hear OR see during an emergency? I know I won’t be convincing you not to purchase an AVP due to your continued rhetoric about “how great Apple Vision Pro is” but there are WAY too many negatives and compromises that people are ignoring (yourself included) just because they are DIEHARD Apple followers.
 
There is going to be a downside to using the VP and that is advertisers. There will be some, possible many advertising companies out their licking their lips at the prospect of having a clients advert being shown in full sized glory in a VP. they will find a way to do it, ethics and morals and legality be damned. How many websites will include cookies that will specifically check to see if a VP is connected to the mac machine and if it detects one will then display adverts in all their full large sized glory. At the present moment many website adverts are imbedded into the webpage of the website but what will happen if the website detects a VP is connected, will it have code that will have the website appear as though it has popped out of the webpage and displaying at full size? because we all know advertising companies do not give a damn about us users and the inconvenience their clients adverts can be to us.


Had to post it…
 
Also very confused by this. Initially I thought that would be a great selling point. Basically create a multi monitor setup without actually have the monitors. Sure working in spaces on a larger screen is convenient, but still not the same as "multiple monitors" unless the virtual display is a giant screen where you can have multiple tabs visible side by side. If the screen is just a giant version with the same visibility as the Mac, that's not good.
Thes the obvious next update to add to VisionOS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dmi
Those are more subtle and people dont fiddle around with their hands in the air to navigate around something no one else but themselves can see though. Imagine you want to hit play on a movie using your Vision Pro on a plane and suddenly you have your finger stuck into your neighbours nose :D honestly, I still dont think it will even work with the change in altitude etc

This "flailing" thing is invented. If you watch the WWDC video, you will see the asian lady interacting with Vpro using hand gestures. Her hands are barely moving and stay in her lap. Look at this wild arm flailing clearly likely to end up with her finger in a fellow airplane passengers nose...


I think this imagination is driven by seeing commercials for gaming on Meta goggles. In that kind of app, part of the goal is to get the user moving more than only a finger & thumb. I would guess that similar gaming and fitness apps for Vpro will involve moving much more aggressively than what is shown in that video. However, I'm not thinking someone is going to try to do a robust workout jammed into an airplane seat... or at least will hope not.
 
Last edited:
The first iteration of iPhone (back when it was built by General Magic) flopped because the market wasn’t ready, the internet was still in its infancy.
What? As soon as the iPhone came out, everyone else was trying to emulate it, with Google's CEO dropping off Apple's Board within six months so Google could steal it and call it Android (As I recall from Steve Jobs rage at him and Google shortly after Android came out). I bought my first iPhone the day after it came out. In the car, on the way home, I called my Retirement Wealth Manager and told him to immediately port 20% of my portfolio to Apple (no, I am not a rich man now, because, as smart as that was, I then sold it during the Great Recession and only made a little bit of money, yes, it was the best of times and the worst of times).
 
I tried using my iPad Pro with sidecar, and the amount of CPU needed to compress the data sent to the iPad is insane. What makes anyone think they can do this in stereo with higher resolution and framerates without severely taxing your laptop?
 
Feels like we are just arguing in circles.

Sure, when I am at home, I may prefer an external display which doesn't hang off my head.

But a monitor also cannot be fit inside my bag, nor would it be as easy to bring around. Like if MKBHD is in another country, this looks like something that would be useful when he is editing videos in his hotel room.

Nothing wrong with having both, and opting to use the right tool for the job at the right time. The best tool is the one you have on you.
and you gonna wear that **** 8hrs on your face?
 
Mac and Vision Pro: What You (Likely) Can't Do

Connect an Intel Mac
Well there you go then: that's my reason for not buying one.

Whilst the gaming potential is good, I don't play games enough. Likewise with films, I have a large TV and a sound system and I watch films with my partner, so doing this on my own is unlikely, unless I'm on a flight and I already carry an iPad and AirPod Max for that.

I postponed buying a new iMac because the screen size was too small for me and instead bought a family member's late 2020 27" iMac from them last year to replace my 2012 one which was still working well. The alternative was a Mac mini and a new monitor but the price was right.

So now if I want to squander £3,500 on the Vision Pro, I'm expected to spend another £2,500 first?

No thanks.
 
The only thing people can do is… avoid buying it. Apple has to learn this price is utterly ridiculous, the hard way.
There’s a craft beer and distillery in my town that sells their beer for $8/glass. The bar down the street sells Bud Light for $2 a bottle. The $8 beer is going gangbusters, gets rave reviews, has been in magazine articles.. It's very successful. Just saying.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.