Obviously you never watch techraxDo these characters who destroy the products get enough views that it pays for them to do their unscientific tests?
It got you to click and comment. Mission accomplished.Just stupid. Why promote this?
Hey, good point. I mean in all seriousness, did the hammer trigger crash detection or fall detection?Watch says “It looks like I’ve been involved in a road rage accident. If you don’t respond within 30 seconds I’m calling for an ambulance!”
Technically he hit the metal door with the hammer (successfully demonstrating that it didn't dent); but it was a large metal sphere that he lugged at the window. But I'm just nitpicking details. Point is, he too was surprised that large metal objects break glass.even Musk broke a cyber truck's window with a hammer... Yes you can break suff with hammer - I had no idea you could use a hammer in that way.
The watch would need to survive if it is to call emergency services after the fall. So maybe the more useful test would be strapping the watch to a dummy and tossing it off a cliff.This is good to know next time I fall off a mountain that if I survive odds are the ultra would as well
Yes, many times over.Do these characters who destroy the products get enough views that it pays for them to do their unscientific tests?
Yep, never understood the point of destroying things just to prove how durable they might be. Apple already did these tests before bringing a product to the market but for some weird reason people still keep doing these videos and I guess there is an audience for that so they monetize from it. I honestly think is a waste of resources and someone would love to have that product. Sad.Just why
Do these characters who destroy the products get enough views that it pays for them to do their unscientific tests?