The reverse is just as true - if WP7S was from Apple.. people like you would be all over the MR forums drooling over its "innovative and ground-breaking UI". Just look at iPad forums (and iPad concept isn't exactly on the cutting edge of innovation!)
You're right, the time will tell whether WP7S will be a true success.. But for now, let's just agree that Microsoft has put out a very interesting modern mobile OS.. which, if nothing else, will make other key players in this space (namely Apple and Google) work even harder to compete.. and hopefully not just compete by filing lawsuits.
engadget is not notoriously pro-microsoft.
Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer has famously objected to his employees' iPhone usage, even singling out an iPhone-toting Microsoft employee at a company meeting and playfully pretending to stomp on the device.
Uhm...no. I know for a fact that if you work for Nokia (finland) it is looked down upon if you use an iPhone.
Not the site and editors, but the commenters. Try saying anything pro-Apple or anti-Microsoft in the comments section and see what happens. No, seriously, give it a try.
Anyone who spends any time on Engadget at all knows exactly what kind of mosh pit for Apple haters the comments section has become.
Outside of Apple fan sites that's pretty much the entire internet these days. e.g. check out any Apple story on Digg. Apple is no longer the plucky underdog so it's going to take some slack.
Premature, yes. Baseless, perhaps not. I don't know *SNIP*
Uhm...no. I know for a fact that if you work for Nokia (finland) it is looked down upon if you use an iPhone.
The report notes that Microsoft last year changed its corporate mobile phone reimbursement policies to cover only device running Windows Mobile, although company executives have stated that the move was a cost-cutting measure rather than an attempt to clamp down on employe usage of devices from Microsoft's competitors.
Anyone who spends any time on Engadget at all knows exactly what kind of mosh pit for Apple haters the comments section has become.
In other words, it accurately reflects the 95% of computer users who do not use Apples?
...executives have stated that the move was a cost-cutting measure rather than an attempt to clamp down on employe usage of devices from Microsoft's competitors.
Right, because if there's one multi-billion dollar company that's in need of some cost-cutting, it's Microsoft.![]()
P.S. what is it about the machine you post from that fails to grasp the concept of simple word wrapping?
And .005% of Apple workers use something other than an iPhone. Sounds like a good statistic.
I've never used a windows phone long enough to commet on it.
My thoughts exactly. At a glance it's refreshing to know iPhones are not barred - I might mention it to our own IT dept, if Microsoft allow iPhones why can't we?