They can't put a larger battery in due to flight regulations. It's in the text.Probably would have been brighter if they could have put a bigger battery in it, but then they couldn't have claimed 11 hours of life.
It’s not so much defending the design as perfect as it was playing the voice of reason for users claiming a hardware design flaw and an immediate recall of all butterfly keyboards should happen immediately.Anybody out there still defending the butterfly keyboard: you were wrong. Apology accepted.
(Been waiting a long time to type that, and it feels great.)
I think it's somebody else here spreading misinformation: the processor itself has nothing to do with WiFi. There is a separate chip for that available from Intel as well and Apple could've used it in this laptop.No it’s not. Stop spreading fake news. 45w 9th gen chips don’t have WiFi 6 (AX). Apple would have had to implement a 3rd party controller.
You’ll have to wait another year for 10th gen chips.
Bring back magsafe
It’s not so much defending the design as perfect as it was playing the voice of reason for users claiming a hardware design flaw and an immediate recall of all butterfly keyboards should happen immediately.
It was clear the issue wasn’t urgent enough to take any sort of rash or immediate action.
Bottom line, it was a vocal minority and Apple correctly waited to improve the design in the next iteration, as I predicted.
All of you screaming your head off were the wrong ones.
There were plenty on these forums trying to "convince" us that there was no issue with the Butterfly keyboard and that it was a very limited issue. Turns out they were wrong, thank god there are some people out there that are not afraid to call out companies when they make a bad design decision.It’s not so much defending the design as perfect as it was playing the voice of reason for users claiming a hardware design flaw and an immediate recall of all butterfly keyboards should happen immediately.
It was clear the issue wasn’t urgent enough to take any sort of rash or immediate action.
Bottom line, it was a vocal minority and Apple correctly waited to improve the design in the next iteration, as I predicted.
All of you screaming your head off were the wrong ones.
In 2020, all of those will be obsoleted by the next thing on the horizon.I’ll buy the next rev of this in 2020. Prefer PCIe 4.0, Wi-fi 6 and LPDDR4. (Yes I’m a tech snob lol)
It may not have been optimal, but Apple would have reacted instantly if it were some kind of hardware failure or even issue that was universally hated. It just wasn’t as bad as people believed.There were plenty on these forums trying to "convince" us that there was no issue with the Butterfly keyboard and that it was a very limited issue. Turns out they were wrong, thank god there are some people out there that are not afraid to call out companies when they make a bad design decision.
The arrow keys look beautiful to these eyes - and I won't be looking at them, I'll be cheerfully hitting them with my fingers without looking. That's why the inverted-T is such a win. Jony Ive was giving us things that looked beautiful. They weren't as usable.The arrow keys look horrible.
The arrow keys look horrible.
Why would I want to rest my fingers there? I have the entire keyboard to rest my fingers on. Please tell me you're trolling.Quite opposite, these arrow keys are not about beauty but about usability. You can "rest" your fingers in that empty spaces.
A large audience of Mac laptops are developers and sys admins, many of whom are die-hard keyboard junkies, using command-line interfaces to interact with the local system and remote systems (ie. servers, etc.) and the Esc key is absolutely essential! A `Pro` machine needs to properly support the Esc key.
The inverted-T arrow keys is an improvement over their misstep from the last layout.
I agree that losing the MagSafe connector was a step backwards, but we also have significant battery improvements from when it first came out, so I see it as a give-and-take situation.
Pretty decent update considering previous ones. Would have liked:
...
-More powerful GPU
...
...
Webcam technology has not improved. The lid would need to be much thicker to accomodate a better webcam or a FaceID module.
...
FaceID can't be integrated into the current display since the lid is extremely thin (several times thinner than the FaceID module in iPhones/iPads). It may eventually come in a few years, but definitely impossible to do with current technology. 1080p FaceTime camera would be nice, though.
The Verge and MKBHD have both said 1mm, not .5mm.
Anyone worried about the inclusion of the T2 Security Chip?
So what? Its a webcam fixed in a laptop lid. Ergonomically, it is useless for anything other than video conferencing, and I don't want, or need, to see other people's nose hairs in 4k resolution.
The point is its horrible 720P. It has atrocious low light performance and dynamic range of Nokia 7150...How is 720p disappointing for a camera used only for video conferencing?
So in 9/10 years we've only gained an extra 4hrs in battery (compared to the 17") and still no return of Magsafe, this is one beast I don't want to drag accidentally off a desk, despite the price it would've been a buy (base 17' was £1799 in 2011).