You do know that's a silly argument, right?
It's not about the cost relative to one's disposable income.
The objection I (and others) have with subscription software is that the consumer ends up paying for changes which we may not consider to be improvements worth buying. And sometimes the consumer ends up paying for the loss of a feature that's important to them.
For example - local vaults are important to some people. With v8 they're gone. If you're on subscription then you're screwed. Either keep paying for v7 without ever seeing any updates or suck it up and pay to lose a feature that's important to you.
Now if you do want to play the cost game, let's go back to when v7 was released in May 2018. $3/mo subscription or buy a license for $50. Let's also say you don't see any value in what they've done in v8.
- If you'd bought a license, your out of pocket remains the $50 you paid three years ago and you're likely good another couple years.
- With a subscription, you're already $117 out of pocket, and you keep on paying despite no returned value to you.
But hey, if you're gung ho on the v8 changes, go for it and enjoy the software. Just don't be so myopic as to be unable to understand why not everyone is on the subscription bandwagon.