Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, England may have looked flat in today's friendly, but the USA just won a World Cup 2010 match away to Guatemala 1-0. :) ...
... Very,very physical match, unfortunately the Guatemalans resorted to some truly dirty ...
Our first win in Guatemala since 1988, and I think it shows that Bob Bradley is taking the national team in the right direction, and 2010 has the potential to be one of the USA's best World Cup campaigns ever.

let's hope...

and the Spurs match to which you refer, Brianstorm91, isn't that old. wasn't that just last season?
 
Whenever the US national team goes to South America the match takes on the tone of a heated derby...very hostile territory indeed.

Our first win in Guatemala since 1988, and I think it shows that Bob Bradley is taking the national team in the right direction, and 2010 has the potential to be one of the USA's best World Cup campaigns ever.

This round has to be considered a team-building phase, since USA are in a fairly easy group, even by CONCACAF standards. With only Guatemala, Trinidad & Tobago and Cuba to worry about, they can concentrate on getting the team to gel and prepare for the final round next year. Besides the obvious advancements for US and Mexico, I see Cuba, Canada, Costa Rica, and El Salvador moving on.

But yeah, you have to like a rare win in Guatemala. They're off to a good start.


and the Spurs match to which you refer, Brianstorm91, isn't that old. wasn't that just last season?

I believe it was in 2006.
 
Yeah I didn't mean old old, it's just the pointless old that's stuck into a sentence without any particular meaning!


lol. my bad.


This round has to be considered a team-building phase, since USA are in a fairly easy group, even by CONCACAF standards. With only Guatemala, Trinidad & Tobago and Cuba to worry about, they can concentrate on getting the team to gel and prepare for the final round next year. Besides the obvious advancements for US and Mexico, I see Cuba, Canada, Costa Rica, and El Salvador moving on.

But yeah, you have to like a rare win in Guatemala. They're off to a good start.

I believe it was in 2006.

HAs it been two years..wow!
 
Your 'avin a laugh 'aint you mate?

Only got one good player, super Matty Glennon.

LOL. Yeah, as we saw on Saturday you're Championship material :p

A tad late but;

New chairman, was Town fan for 30 years.

Closed season signed:

Chris Lucketti (from Sheff Utd).
David Unsworth (F/A after turning down deal with Burnley).
Gary Roberts (£250,000 from Ipswich).
Keigan Parker (turned down contract at Blackpool and rejected Barnsley, Coventry).
Andy Butler (£1m rated player who we got on a Bosman from S****horpe after he rejected new contract. You should read what Mourinho said about him.)
Jim Goodwin (another Bosman from S****horpe who rejected deal).
Michael Flynn (Blackpool).
Ian Craney (£200,000+ from Accie Stanley, scored two their first two league games.)
Michael Denton (19 year old "next Peter Crouch". Local lad who turned down contracts from Blackburn and Palace to join his hometown club.)
Liam Dickinson (1 month loan from Derby. £1m player who has come to get some games under his belt.)

The lads need some time to gel, as you can see we are playing practically a new team. 0 goals conceded so far and once we click that will be it.

16,000+ season tickets sold, passionate local chairman and a good manager in Stan Ternent. CCC, in our centenary year, we will join you.
 
If I was from S****horpe, I would be insulted that my city name is auto-censored here at MR. Of course, I suppose that it serves them right for having **** in their name.
 
Hahahaha. So, are you saying that Sc*nthorpe is a town I should scratch off my UK vacation itinerary? :D

I think there may be a little local rivalry going on here. BTW, I'd give Paisley a miss too!:D

Apparantly Sc unthorpe is such a problem that somebody has decided to write a Wiki page about it (but I don't think that link will work because the censor covers mark up language). Nwankwo Kanu shares a similar problem!
 
Apparantly Sc unthorpe is such a problem that somebody has decided to write a Wiki page about it (but I don't think that link will work because the censor covers mark up language). Nwankwo Kanu shares a similar problem!

LOL, that article included such hilarious placenames as Penistone, Lightwater, and the Horniman Museum. But this one takes the cake:

In February 2003 Members of Parliament at the British House of Commons found that a new spam filter was blocking e-mails containing references to the Sexual Offences Bill then under debate, as well as some messages relating to a discussion about censorship.

:rolleyes:

Back to football. Re: England - This might be seen as heresy, but I think Capello should scrap the current strikeforce entirely. Rooney can start from the bench until he learns to play his position. England's starting forwards should be some combination of Ashton, Agbonlahor and Walcott.

And I think Beckham should give way to Bentley.
 
Back to football. Re: England - This might be seen as heresy, but I think Capello should scrap the current strikeforce entirely. Rooney can start from the bench until he learns to play his position. England's starting forwards should be some combination of Ashton, Agbonlahor and Walcott.

And I think Beckham should give way to Bentley.

You are right about Rooney. He doesn't have a position, and tends to go walkabout (headless chicken), so if he is one of the strikers we often find ourselves with only 1 up front (and don't even get me started about playing him as the lone striker).

Of the three 'Strikers' you listed I would only class Ashton as an actual striker, the other two are wanderers like Rooney, or even out-and-out wingers.

Clearly I think England has to play 4-4-2, every attempt to play anything else has always been a disaster. I think those two strikers should be a 'target-man' and a 'poacher' like Sheringham and Shearer were (or to a lesser extend Heskey and Owen, and yes, they were a good combination a few years ago)

As far as I'm concerned, only 2 places in the team should be (semi-)automatic as of now, the 2 centre backs, Terry and Ferdinand. I would say that the other 9 places should be up for grabs, but of course, they are not.

Is it possible that by selecting players that have slightly less ability (or are perceived as such) would actually produce better results as they would bust their ass for the opportunity.

As for Beckham, yes, he should probably be replaced, the problem is that he is still our best dead ball specialist and that is the only way we seem to be able to score.
 
Clearly I think England has to play 4-4-2, every attempt to play anything else has always been a disaster.
Not necessarily – one of our finest performances in a Tournament Finals was at Euro 96 with Terry Venables' famous 5-3-2-1 'Christmas Tree' formation. And wasn't our only international success (back at the 1966 World Cup) based on a 4-3-3 after Jimmy Greaves got injured – Sir Alf's 'wingless wonders'?

Our players line up in all kinds of formations and systems for their respective clubs and all seem to do fine – but put them in an England shirt and ask them to play in these systems and they suddenly turn clueless.

Is it possible that by selecting players that have slightly less ability (or are perceived as such) would actually produce better results as they would bust their ass for the opportunity.
Not so much a case of players busting their collective arses for an opportunity – but picking your best team doesn't always mean picking your best players...
 
You are right about Rooney. He doesn't have a position, and tends to go walkabout (headless chicken), so if he is one of the strikers we often find ourselves with only 1 up front (and don't even get me started about playing him as the lone striker).[/QUOTE[

I agree, and Rooney as lone striker is a joke - with him as lone striker a 4-5-1 becomes a 4-6-0.

Of the three 'Strikers' you listed I would only class Ashton as an actual striker, the other two are wanderers like Rooney, or even out-and-out wingers.

You have a point, but the status quo clearly isn't working - they should get their chance.

Clearly I think England has to play 4-4-2, every attempt to play anything else has always been a disaster. I think those two strikers should be a 'target-man' and a 'poacher' like Sheringham and Shearer were (or to a lesser extend Heskey and Owen, and yes, they were a good combination a few years ago)

Two words: Dean Windass. :D As a bonus, he dates from the Sheringham and Shearer years.

As far as I'm concerned, only 2 places in the team should be (semi-)automatic as of now, the 2 centre backs, Terry and Ferdinand. I would say that the other 9 places should be up for grabs, but of course, they are not.

But Terry was unconvincing against the Czechs...it could be bias but I think Gerrard still deserves an automatic call-up. Ditch Rooney and let Gerrard roam forward in the center behind Agbonlahor and Walcott.

Is it possible that by selecting players that have slightly less ability (or are perceived as such) would actually produce better results as they would bust their ass for the opportunity.

Couldn't agree more. Where's the hunger?

As for Beckham, yes, he should probably be replaced, the problem is that he is still our best dead ball specialist and that is the only way we seem to be able to score.

England will never be a contender until they start scoring in open play - and at that point Beckham becomes surplus to requirements. Looking forward (literally and figuratively) England's future lies with their young forwards, not aged midfielders - or Michael Owen...I think I saw him play once. Or was that Harry Kewell? :rolleyes:
 
Is it Darren Anderton you're thinking of? :confused:

Ha, no. I was comparing Kewell and Owen for their amazing disappearing acts through constant injury. The aged midfielder I was referring to is Golden Balls...Bentley should have started.

Biggest problem with England midfield: they can't take people one on one. The Czechs let England pass around in their own half, and that's all they could manage. The commentary became comical: Beckham...Lampard....to Barry....here's Gerrard....back to Beckham....sent back to Terry, and now to James. And that was England. Those midfielders need to feed the ball to the strikers!
 
Is it Darren Anderton you're thinking of? :confused:

Saw him play myself for Bournemouth you know. Shocking.

jaded-mandarin, how many examples of big spending in one summer do we need before fans, managers and chairman actually switch on to the fact changing 9+ players in a team at once doesn't work. Hope your ready for a relegation battle.
 
I'm more annoyed by Aston Villa, I want them to finish fifth or better and (spoiler follows)
they're not going to do that by losing to Stoke are they?!
 
I honestly can't believe the refereeing standard in Scotland right now! :eek:

Rangers should be top with 9 points, whilst Celtic should have only 4. Instead, thanks to very poor decisions they are all square with 7 points each!
 
Sheff Wed 1 - 1 Preston
20' Sean McAllister 1
77' 1 Richard Chaplow


Sheff Wed 1-1-1

GOALS
2 Tudgay
2 Sodje
1 Esajas
1 Sean McAllister


Blackburn 1 - 1 Hull
38' Jason Roberts 1
40' 1 Richard Garcia

Hull 1-1-O
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.