that was a strange race.
A pretty good race while it was still running, but I would've preferred if they waited another 15 minutes as the weather did clear up.
Alas, in F1 a red flag suspends the race, but doesn't actually stop it. Therefore, while there was no action, the two hour clock was still running and it became clear that they could not re-start the race prior to the two hour time limit to hold a race in was exceeded. So they had no choice but to call it.
Have to tip the hat to Sir Richard. SPEED says his sponsorship deal with Brawn is $250,000 USD per race and the Virgin Group reaped some $10,000,000 worth of "television ad time" at Melbourne. Even with Sepang being called at a bit over half-distance, I expect they still did pretty well there, too.
$250,000 per GP this season, $30,000,000 for next season in total so if the budget cap gets introduced then they are sorted. Plus I can't think of any better than Ross Brawn to spend a budget wisely!
Really sad the race didn't get to finish, but good job on Button for pole (and being in 1st when the race was called).
Easily the best moments from the weekend.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrQhP-HuZNA&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwsjQF8pCec&feature=player_embedded
If anybody has an audio file of the first one I'd like a copy. That somehow needs to get on my phone as a ring tone!
Edit: Can we not insert YT files?
whats up with kimi anyway?
why did he pit it?
KERS problem I believe.
With regard to the budget cap, the FIA will make sure they have enough extras to ensure that the capped teams have a big enough advantage to ensure they win, hence making ever team want the budget cap.
when did this budget cap come around?
just heard about it from here.
It is quite ironic than some teams have spent that $30million on KERS alone!
It's not like he'd have to collect unemployment if he said no to McLaren. Not that that matters, but it certainly makes it easier to take the honest path.
A team that wants to win. They are in it for the sponsorship money and glory, not integrity. Alonso ratted out McLaren and not only did Renault hire him back, but I wouldn't be surprised to see him at another top tier team like Ferrari in the future. There's the real world for you.The real World is not as you would wish it to be.
Who would hire a driver that rats on his team??
Except that Hamilton's lie had a victim in Jarno Trulli. If he had gotten away with it, Jarno would have been unfairly cheated. As it is Lewis took away Jarno's joy and celebration of getting on the podium when it counted.I don't understand why you'd punish him further. You DQed him and took away an subsequent points. Additionally, that reinstated points to Truli and Toyota, so any wrong was corrected. Why is there a need to drag this out further? Ontop of that - and I hate to say it - I don't see Hamilton having a shot at the title this year. It's possible, but the team will seriously need to turn the car around by the end of April if they want a realistic shot.
On 2 April, at a second hearing before the stewards of the Australian Grand Prix meeting in Malaysia [Vodaphone McLaren Mercedes] made no attempt to correct the untrue statement of 29 March but, on the contrary, continued to maintain that the statement was true, despite being allowed to listen to a recording of the team instructing Hamilton to let Trulli past and despite being given more than one opportunity to correct its false statement
The real World is not as you would wish it to be.
Who would hire a driver that rats on his team??
A team that wants to win. They are in it for the sponsorship money and glory, not integrity. Alonso ratted out McLaren and not only did Renault hire him back, but I wouldn't be surprised to see him at another top tier team like Ferrari in the future. There's the real world for you.