OTOH, if you DON'T need or want an ODD or ethernet port, why not get yourself an Air? The entire purpose of having two lines is to meet the needs of two fundamentally different types of users, not to simply make one line more expensive with zero practical differences.
I build software for a living. Compiling C++ is a big CPU burden. I've been making do with a work computer with 4 cores (a ThinkPad) while I wait for Apple to deliver on this new generation of MBPs. So no, I don't really have much use for an Air, with its gimped CPU+GPU.
The PRO designation does MEAN something - at least for those of us who actually USE the features the Pro line has which the Air line does NOT have.
I think it CAN mean something - it just doesn't mean what you seem to think it means. What did "PRO" mean 5 years ago? PCI slots? PCMCIA cards? 10 years ago? An RJ-11 adapter with a built-in modem and fax? How about 15 years ago? An old parallel port? ADB? Magneto-optical drives? Would you like Apple to jam a few of those back into the MBP? Just in case?
Just what do you want Apple to do here? My work laptop (a ThinkPad which I desperately want to swap out for MacBookPro9,X when it's available) has an RGB adapter on it. What the ****? It actually has a cutting-edge Display Port, and right next to it it has an old RGB adapter - the cutting edge of 1980's tech! Is that really what you want? How does anything move forward? How do we become more productive in 5 years time without leaving at least some of the old stuff behind? There's no Thunderbolt or USB3 on my ThinkPad (a fairly recent model), but it actually has an RGB connector!
I NEED an ODD to give quick run-off copies of demo videos to my clients when I am on the road. I do NOT need the hassle of having to dig adapters and externals out of my bag and plug them in (thus significantly increasing my footprint) while my clients are waiting for me to proceed with my presentation.
So you're already carrying adapters around, otherwise you just have to hope and pray that your clients have a projector that accepts Display Port, and they'd probably better have a Display Port cable and a mini Display Port adapter lying around too, right?
It is FAR more impressive to just whip out my MBP, run my demo, and if the initial presentation is positively received, burn a quick copy to DVD for them to present to their board for final approval.
Writing your demo to a cheap-o SD card that you can just give them would be even more "impressive". SD cards are also an order of magnitude faster both to write to and to read from) than a crummy DVD-R. And you'd never have to say, "hey guys - do you have a flat, stable surface that I can set my computer on for 15 minutes while I burn my demo to this janky old DVDR for you? Oops-a-daisy! Burnt another coaster! Why don't you guys go to another meeting while I finish this up for you?"
I'm not trying to tell you your business here. I'm just sick of all the crybabies in this forum tantruming. "Oh boo hoo! Apple is forsaking the 'PRO' market! SCSI ports are the only way I could ever possibly get my job done! No laptop without a SCSI port is "PRO"! No computer without a SCSI port is "LEET"! I'm going to be out on the unemployment line tomorrow and Apple is going to go bankrupt! I'm going out and buying a PC!"
One other thing: I can guarantee you the weight difference between a MBP with ODD and ethernet, and an MBP w/o, is not going to be 1.6 lbs. An internal ODD weighs less than 4 oz., and the 1/8" difference in thickness the lower case assembly would need to accommodate the ODD and a gigabit ethernet port is not going to add 21 extra oz. either. The TOTAL difference in weight between a design with ODD and ethernet, and a design without - all other factors except case thickness being equal - would probably turn out to be less than 6 oz.
Depends on the new design. The current 15" has a very wide bezel around the monitor. Apple could probably put a 16" display in it - the 15" MBP is actually about 16" in size. Could they instead shrink the MBP to a true 15" by eliminating the bezel?
They'd have to make the chassis smaller, and that means that stuff inside it needs to be smaller. Getting rid of the ODD gives them the freedom to consider that, without making the battery any smaller or making the logic board smaller (and probably eliminating the discrete GPU).
If they used the elimination of the ODD as an opportunity to shrink the chassis, then yes, it's actually possible that the MBP could lose a lot of weight, both because of the lost aluminum in the case, and the lost glass in the monitor.
Conversely, carrying an ODD in external form will add more weight to be handled by my 52 year old back than a built in ODD will. So, NO, I will NOT be thanking anyone for a lighter Mac that just forces me to carry a bunch of heavier add-ons that were once built in.
Well, assuming that you really do want to stick with old DVDR's, you probably wouldn't buy a DVDR drive made out of aluminum and glass. My external DVDR is made out of cheap, light plastic. Light as a feather.
And a quick question: how the heck will adding a thunderbolt display to my MBP help with my need for an ethernet port on a Mac PORTABLE? Am I supposed to haul around the thunderbolt display along with the external ODD? I thought you were concerned about my aging back?
Read my other messages here. Your usage pattern is atypical. For every travelling salesman selling stuff to people who only have ethernet ports, there are a lot more people who want the mobility of a light computer to use in coffee shops and airports, but then want to 'dock' them at work and at home where we have extra monitors, USB devices, keyboards, mice, etc.
The MBA wouldn't be a bad fit for this if it didn't have a gimped CPU/GPU and little to no RAM. You can always carry around an ODD and an ethernet adapter with you in your sales job. I can't plug in a faster GPU or CPU.
Last edited: