Why keep wireless built-in then? You could use a USB dongle.
Ask Apple. I'm just relating my own experiences.
Why keep wireless built-in then? You could use a USB dongle.
You seem to not understand it. You ARE using ETHERNET at home if you're using WiFi since your WiFi router most likely is connected with its WAN ETHERNET port to your ISP's cable.
So no, it's not outdated. Without Ethernet you won't be getting good internet at home.
If only and ever Wifi becomes as much reliable, fast, secure and with the same range as an ethernet cable, then I will happily dump Ethernet in favor for wireless. But Wifi in its current form is a cripple in comparison to Ethernet. Sorry.
By the way. With a cheap $2 gadget I could render your wifi network at home unusable. And you couldn't do anything about that. That you call reliable?
No it's perfectly valid. He calls eggs outdated and at the same time he lickes chicken. But there is no chicken without an egg.I don't think he cares about where it's sourced from. Your argument seems poor in my opinion. Maybe if his wireless router was about to have its ethernet port removed....
It's as poor as someone saying to me they don't like eggs, and me saying YOU DO, you like chicken and that comes from an egg.
He calls eggs outdated and at the same time he lickes chicken.
What has this thread become?![]()
I have a question, which is like many I use Windows on my Mac, so how am I suppose to install my Windows 7 without a DVD drive? Can you download it? And if you can what size USB stick would you need?
You can make bootable flash drive and install windows with it. You will need about 4gb flash drive, ideal would be 8gb since 4 gb in many times actually are 3,4-3,6gb.
There's a difference between "I'm upset about this feature being missing" and "the laptop sucks now". The former is more reasonable, the latter is just asinine. Sadly, many people are screaming the latter. The idea that the removal of the port is somehow amounts to Apple abandoning a market, or that its no longer worth the money is what is bothering me so much. For example, I was upset that when I bought the iPhone 4s, I couldn't switch off 3g. I frequently would, in order to save battery life when I knew I wasn't going to be using my phone much(football games is an example). However, I gained a lot of other benefits so it's a loss I'm willing to take. Basically, I feel the apocalyptic talk of the removal of ethernet is outrageous and, frankly, childish.They're saying that the removal of the ethernet port is a negative thing, a point that stands regardless of everything that isn't in direct conflict. To put it more clearly, the only new feature that appears to conflict with including an ethernet port is the thickness of the device itself. The new display, new graphics card, ivy bridge, etc. don't prevent ethernet. Therefore the value proposition is between the form factor and that functionality. When it comes to practical buying decisions, one does have to weigh the whole package and make the choice. However, until it's released, individual features are going to be discussed because it's still not a whole package for sale. Even then, there's nothing wrong with being upset with the loss of a feature.
What current one? This isn't even a "problem" yet. If the port is removed, use a USB 3.0 adapter.Educational, thank you. That would be a fine solution then. The current one is not.
I'll admit that the ODD is in more of an immediate obsolescence. But I don't see ethernet very far behind. Without thunderbolt and USB 3.0, I would probably agree with you, but as the two technologies are more than capable of providing a quick, easy solution I don't see a reason to object to its removal. And also I AM hoping they throw in 802.11ac, because that will make the move all the more justified. My next statement isn't aimed at you because, as I implied earlier, you're not really whining but questioning the removal.I still don't see the business or technical case for removing it. I'm not being a troll; I just don't accept their decisions on faith, opting instead to weigh each decision individually. Note that I'm not objecting to the removal of the ODD as there seems to be a strong case for its weight, power consumption, and size being a measurable detriment to the desires and needs of users. I don't see an equal value proposition when it comes to the ethernet port. The amount gained doesn't seem to outweigh the loss (disagreeing on this point is mostly subjective, so one of those agree to disagree things).
So you would need to make a flash drive using the DVD rom then using your existing Mac?
I have a question, which is like many I use Windows on my Mac, so how am I suppose to install my Windows 7 without a DVD drive? Can you download it? And if you can what size USB stick would you need?
Will USB 3.0 support USB 2.0 devices?
Yes, it's completely backwards compatible (and most USB 3.0 devices I've seen will run on USB 2 as well, but with lower transfer speeds)
Oddly enough, either in this thread or others, there were those arguing they should go that route and force people to buy external thunderbolt GPUs. Ugh.Well, they have gone with this option in the past. The 2009 15'' low end MBP came with integrated graphics only. I'm not sure how well that worked out with the sales numbers.
You can download the ISO.
Remember, MacBook Airs, Windows Ultrabooks and netbooks all ship without DVD drives.
Bootcamp assistant makes it easy. As long as you have an ISO file (or a DVD on a remote drive, or an attached USB DVD drive) you can install Windows.
Cool so you can get around it and download iso's. Just curious really, I wasn't planning on replacing my 2010 model but the rumours are getting me excited haha.
No it's perfectly valid. He calls eggs outdated and at the same time he lickes chicken. But there is no chicken without an egg.
Also it's not about what he has at home. Many people use MacBook Pro for work and without ethernet it's not suitable for work.
I pretty much never use wireless (very rarely) and I could use a USB adapter. But I understand its importance for many people and I don't call for Apple to remove wireless because I personally don't use it often. And I don't call it outdated.
Very selfish.......
I have a 2010 model as well. If you do decide to get the new model coming out, it'll be a substantial upgrade.
So you would need to make a flash drive using the DVD rom then using your existing Mac?
Why remove ethernet port? Just for the sake of removing? Don't tell me of thickness, the MacBook Pro already has ideal thickness and to strive for the thinniest you can get by sacrificing essentials is stupid. Remember that perfect is the enemy of good.
I just can't understand why people support this move from Apple.
1) Wireless is unreliable
2) Wireless is unstable
3) Wireless is EASILY blocked
4) Wireless is slow
5) Wireless is more complex resulting in more potential incompatibilities between stations and clients.
6) Wireless is more difficult to deploy and maintain
7) Wireless is short range and its speed is reduced dramatically when farther from the station.
The only good in wireless is mobility around the station. This is good for coffee shops but not for office and not for production environment where you don't really need it.
My suspicion is that most people don't use their Macbook Pros in places without wireless. It's likely that ethernet usage is increasingly rare, in the same way that optical disk drive usage is now minimal. In offices, you can use the ethernet dongle, which, I grant you, isn't ideal for office users, but it will only be a small annoyance. Whether Apple keeps the ethernet port shouldn't be too troublesome if you have the adapter.