There ya go.Detroit was robbed
Had he gone to the ground while at the 2 it would have been a catch, he got fancy and tried to stretch it into a TD.Lol.
It's just so easy to fix. Once the receiver has control of the ball and two feet in bounds, it's a catch.
Oh wait, that is the rule for every type of catch except that one.
He never had control, so your change does not affect this play.
There ya go.
----------
Had he gone to the ground while at the 2 it would have been a catch, he got fancy and tried to stretch it into a TD.
Just because he caught the ball in the air is meaningless. If the ground can create the ball to pop out it isn't a catch.You're on the minority here. It's a bad rule and needs to be changed.
Of course, it happened to Dez Bryant and he wears a blue star on his helmet, so now it's a great rule.
----------
If he can do that, that's definitely control.
Just because he caught the ball in the air is meaningless. If the ground can create the ball to pop out it isn't a catch.
And he lost the ball before going down.He caught the ball. He has it. He can either fumble or be down. It's not that hard.
Had he gone to the ground while at the 2 it would have been a catch, he got fancy and tried to stretch it into a TD.
And he lost the ball before going down.
The play was ruled dead, so it can't be a fumble. He lost control before his body was ruled down, there for it is an incomplete pass.So why isn't it a fumble?
"Ground can't cause a fumble"
Then he was down.
There are so many better answers than "oh, it's a catch but it's incomplete because he didn't take it home with him"
There ya go.
----------
Had he gone to the ground while at the 2 it would have been a catch, he got fancy and tried to stretch it into a TD.
Where was your outrage last week when the Lions lost the no PI call?Yeah, we obviously don't have to take you seriously if that's your opinion
The play was ruled dead, so it can't be a fumble. He lost control before his body was ruled down, there for it is an incomplete pass.
Read the rule as written then get back to me.See what I just posted. Your bias is showing, Jeter.
Where was your outrage last week when the Lions lost the no PI call?
Read the rule as written then get back to me.
The rule is only bad when it goes against your team. Had the call gone against the Packers you would be fine with it.Because bad coaching and poor execution lost the Lions the football game!
The Cowboys didn't deserve to win, but that was a catch!
----------
The rule is bad, pinstripes.
The rule is only bad when it goes against your team. Had the call gone against the Packers you would be fine with it.
Prove it. Start a poll. On this thread, it looks even or leaning not-in-your-favor.You're on the minority here. It's a bad rule and needs to be changed.
Do not accuse me of that kind of bias. Yes, I dislike the Cowboys, but I am keen to seeing the right call made on every play and will be quick to concede when a good call goes against my preference.Of course, it happened to Dez Bryant and he wears a blue star on his helmet, so now it's a great rule.
Prove it. Start a poll. On this thread, it looks even or leaning not-in-your-favor.
Do not accuse me of that kind of bias. Yes, I dislike the Cowboys, but I am keen to seeing the right call made on every play and will be quick to concede when a good call goes against my preference.
Get over it people. Dallas lost. End of story. Go home and complain like I'm sure Broncos fans are doing right now.
It's on to the conference championship games and the super duper bowl.
"If a player goes to the ground in the act of catching a pass (with or without contact by an opponent), he must maintain control of the ball throughout the process of contacting the ground, whether in the field of play or the end zone. If he loses control of the ball, and the ball touches the ground before he regains control, the pass is incomplete. If he regains control prior to the ball touching the ground, the pass is complete."
The Rule.
You know what tarnished the NFL, it isn't the rule about a ball touching the ground, it is protecting the QB like he is a princess who just got their nails done.You're right, because a sample size of three on this board is at all a relevant test.
I can't believe Roger Goodell is on macrumors! Your game is flawed. That play was brilliant and that catch (it was a catch) was amazing.
Fixing this ruling makes the game better.
----------
Dallas would have lost anyway. Rodgers would have lead the team down the field against a horrible Dallas defense and kicked a field goal to win the game.
That's not the point. It is a bad rule. The NFL is tarnished with rules like this.
You know what tarnished the NFL, it isn't the rule about a ball touching the ground, it is protecting the QB like he is a princess who just got their nails done.
You're right, because a sample size of three on this board is at all a relevant test.
I can't believe Roger Goodell is on macrumors! Your game is flawed. That play was brilliant and that catch (it was a catch) was amazing.
Fixing this ruling makes the game better.
----------
Dallas would have lost anyway. Rodgers would have lead the team down the field against a horrible Dallas defense and kicked a field goal to win the game.
That's not the point. It is a bad rule. The NFL is tarnished with rules like this.
What. You're just now realizing the NFL is tarnished ?
Murderers, substance abusers, wife beaters and you complain because " america's team " lost ?
Boo hoo hoo.