This should be a Packers/Patriots Superbowl.
But it's not.
Las Vegas likes (barely) New England. I like Seattle
But it's not.
Las Vegas likes (barely) New England. I like Seattle
You mean a Packers/Ravens Superbowl?This should be a Packers/Patriots Superbowl.
But it's not.
Las Vegas likes (barely) New England. I like Seattle
And Seattle beat the Packers. The Ravens and Packers should have won but they didn't so they are not playing anymore.pats beat the ravens...
And Seattle beat the Packers. The Ravens and Packers should have won but they didn't so they are not playing anymore.
This should be a Packers/Patriots Superbowl.
But it's not.
Las Vegas likes (barely) New England. I like Seattle
Did you even read what is in the thread? I was responding to what you see on top there.what are you even talking about? ravens didn't have a melt down. pats intercepted flaccos poorly thrown ball to end the game. jesus christ your bias is so insufferable.
Did you even read what is in the thread? I was responding to what you see on top there.
The Ravens gave the game to the Patriots just as the Packers gave the game to the Seahawks. You could argue that they earned it but I think Green Bay and Baltimore lost it.You said it should be a packers/ravens superbowl. You're implying that the packers meltdown is the main reason seattle won. You're also implying that the pats didn't win that game against the ravens, but that the ravens lost it.
While your statements about the packers (up 19-7 with 5 mins to go) might have some merit, there is no merit of this idea to the Patriots/Ravens game because the patriots actually won that game. Your implication that "the ravens should have won" is quizzical to me. That's what I was referring to.
there is no merit of this idea to the Patriots/Ravens game because the patriots actually won that game. Your implication that "the ravens should have won" is quizzical to me. That's what I was referring to.
The Patriots won, I do think the Ravens had their chances and really could have won that game. The Colts on the other hand had no business even being there. The Packers for the most part choked at the end against the Seahawks.He's a bit biased and he's trying to bait me/Patriots fans.
Anyone who argues that coming back from TWO 14-point deficits and then holding the opponent to a field goal when it mattered is nuts, biased, or doesn't watch football. MacNut, take your pick.
Lance Armstrong won too.It should be the Pats and Seattle because. Simply put.
THEY WON.
Hello ?
I don't think you get the reason for Nye debating creationists, but that's another topic for another part of the forum.I'm not sure what NDT is talking about. He mentioned in a tweet the 16% difference in pressure when it's clearly not that, it's a 7% difference in pressure taking into account absolute pressure with the atmosphere.
Bill Nye hasn't be relevant in the scientific community ever since he started appearing on shows to debate creationists. Everyone knows its a complete waste of time but people just bask in the spotlight.
I'm curious that neither of you mentioned that 2 separate MIT scientists did separate studies and showed that their results agree with Belichick. Curious indeed
I don't think you get the reason for Nye debating creationists, but that's another topic for another part of the forum.
So I see that some scientists are claiming Belicheck's explanation is possible. Others refute that. Wilson, the company that makes the game balls, also says it's bunk.
Then there's this, which suggests that the Patriots may have been doing this since 2007.
As a reminder for everyone here, all reports critical of the New England Patriots and head coach Bill Belichick are:
- Born out of envy and jealousy. YOU wish your team was as successful
- Biased. The team is under a constant witch hunt from the league
Enjoy the rest of your day.
what are you even talking about? ravens didn't have a melt down. pats intercepted flaccos poorly thrown ball to end the game. jesus christ your bias is so insufferable.
I don't think you get the reason for Nye debating creationists, but that's another topic for another part of the forum.
So I see that some scientists are claiming Belicheck's explanation is possible. Others refute that. Wilson, the company that makes the game balls, also says it's bunk.
Then there's this, which suggests that the Patriots may have been doing this since 2007.
The Ravens gave the game to the Patriots just as the Packers gave the game to the Seahawks. You could argue that they earned it but I think Green Bay and Baltimore lost it.
It should be the Pats and Seattle because. Simply put.
THEY WON.
Hello ?
Am I the only one who thinks Marshawn Lynch is an ass? He's an amazing football player, but still, an ass.
There are a lot of ridiculous rules in the NFL, but if you can't answer normal questions that everyone else in the NFL can answer, you're an ass.
I'm no fan of the Pats, but if Tom Brady pulled that crap, he'd be getting killed from coast to coast.
No you're not the only one.
Every fan of the teams Seattle beat think he's an ass also.
![]()
Am I the only one who thinks Marshawn Lynch is an ass? He's an amazing football player, but still, an ass.
There are a lot of ridiculous rules in the NFL, but if you can't answer normal questions that everyone else in the NFL can answer, you're an ass.
I'm no fan of the Pats, but if Tom Brady pulled that crap, he'd be getting killed from coast to coast.