Exactly. That’s how we know what a colossal misstep the home button was.If the notch ever gets smaller, that is Apple's admission that it shouldn't exist in the first place.
Remember, FaceID is MUCH more and will be much much more than a way to authenticate your phone. Apple is thinking bigger than the first version of FaceID. TouchID is essentially only an authentication system. Very limited.Can we go back to TouchID now that underscreen scanners have been proven to be more than Vaporware? FaceID is ok but I'd take a bezel-less IPX with no notch and an underscreen fingerprint scanner in a heartbeat.
I tried an IphX. The notch isn't an issue for me either. Then again, I was never attuned to the "fashion side" of these things. For example, the camera lens protruding out from the device like in the current crop of Iphones, and the ipod Touch 5 were never an issue for me either, but I recall articles stating Steve Jobs would absolutely refuse to allow an iPhone with the camera lens protruding out. His engineers told him how impractical that would be, whereas as he'd replied to make the lens go sideways, and use lenses that can bend the light. Another is when Apple released a bunch of LG branded computer monitors. Many MR users lambasted them, saying the aesthetics, styling don't match up with the Mac hardware they're being used with. These were monitors being produced with Apple's input, so they had some say in how they turned out. I wouldn't have cared about this either. If the price was right and it did what I needed to do, then all the better.The notch is such a non issue. The phone looks better than the rest of the competition imo.
Those that are still complaining about the notch either don’t own the phone or never even used one.
Really?
You're saying that hiding the notch makes it MORE unbalanced.
Here is Apple's instructions to developers:
View attachment 747176
I think they've got it the wrong way round, personally! ;-)
The fact they are already trying to reduce its size makes me believe it wasn't the direction they wanted to go in aesthetically .
If the notch ever gets smaller, that is Apple's admission that it shouldn't exist in the first place.
i'm going to have to disagree. i went form a 7+ to an X. i love the phone but when in landscape it feels small unless i expand video content and then notch blocks 1/8th of the screen
Notch to be gone in a few iterations. Its not coming to ipads etc, it was wrong from the word go
I'm never buying a phone with a notch. Come on Apple, you can do better than this!! (Or can they?!).
I'm asking you specifically. I can find issues about literally any product on a forum.Just go over to the iPhone section of MacRumors...
For example, the camera lens protruding out from the device like in the current crop of Iphones, and the ipod Touch 5 were never an issue for me either...
I honestly believe once Touch ID couldn't be done under the screen, they went into plan z mode and released the "iPhone 8" that wasn't going to exist as well as the notch gimmicked X. I bet a story 10 to 15 years from now will come out about this absurdity behind the scenes of them scrambling to put both these models out in time for the release because they weren't the first choice.
I think they worked it in because they couldn’t figure out how to hide it. In fairness to them, there is a lot going on in that space. I don’t think it’s a lack of innovation but rather a difficult problem to solve. I can’t park my car in my bathroom for a variety of reasons including that it wouldn’t fit. Does that mean I’m not innovative?lol. This proves the notch was never a thing and they worked it into one due to their own lack of innovation.
I can honestly say that not once have I looked at my IPX and said 'Damn I wish that notch wasn't there, look how it obscures my view of this photo / app / video'
Essential phone has a smaller notch but adoption is still slow even with ceramic build quality, lower prices, etc. Nobody likes an ugly notch no matter how small.
I understand why its there and it is obviously necessary for the technology it houses, I'm simple stating I'm not sure if that's ideally how they would have wanted to integrate the screen and its shape the way it inevitably turned out.I disagree. It was unavoidable with the cameras and sensors being placed at the top of the screen. If they didn't want the nothc then they would have gone with a straight black bar across the top. By making the notch smaller (read: still there) they're going for even more screen real estate. Granted, the additional space is small, but is still an addition nonetheless.
Not sure where you're getting the 1/8 from. The notch takes up between 3-4% of space vertically (or horizontally in landscape mode). That's roughly 1/27 of the screen in that direction. Unless you're talking about the additional video that is getting cut off in the zoom mode (which is closer to 21%). But even if the notch wasn't there, you'd still be losing a lot of video in the zoom mode.
The top shows 16:9 video on iPhone X screen. The middle shows what 16:9 video is cut off in zoom mode. The bottom shows how many notches fit across the screen. And before you ask, why yes, I am bored at work today.
![]()
Clearly this won't happen since the notch was clearly a design decision.
![]()
They are just ahead of time.FaceID - needs a massive notch
Fastest mobile CPU performance - needs battery replacing every year
Macbook Pro - needs a dongle (or three)
What happened Apple?
Remember, FaceID is MUCH more and will be much much more than a way to authenticate your phone. Apple is thinking bigger than the first version of FaceID. TouchID is essentially only an authentication system. Very limited.
This is the single biggest thing people struggle with on this debate.
FaceID is NOT simply a replacement for TouchID.
Yes, it clearly was a design decision. With the limitations provided, they were forced to decide between a full black bar at the top, or the notch. Not sure why anyone thinks otherwise. If the technology existed to completely hide the sensors/cameras beneath the screen in order to get a full edge to edge display they would have certainly done it.