Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Because going DP-only significantly reduces complexity and cost, and results in a thinner screen. This is probably the 3rd time I'm posting this, but oh well: http://displayport.org/simpler-setup/Direct-Drive.htm

Screw HDMI. The connector sucks and the licensing sucks. Too bad HDMI will be around for a while yet.

Oh, and the Apple Store is back to saying "Ships: November". WTF Apple? Get it sorted. WANT.

YOu're in an awful big hurry to get a "Rev A" Apple product. Haven't learned the hard way yet, I'm guessing? :D
 
YOu're in an awful big hurry to get a "Rev A" Apple product. Haven't learned the hard way yet, I'm guessing? :D

Hah, if only. I bought an original (CoreDuo) 17" MBP, had 3 problems, was sent a brand new 2nd gen (C2D) after a year, had 3 problems, was sent a 4th gen (Penryn) after another year. Sold that one due to the screen buzzing... and now I'm on a "revision A" unibody Macbook that's perfect... finally. :D

I'm not sure the "rev A" theory ever applied to ACDs, but in my view an LED LCD is inherently different. Out of the box, you instantly know if there are any major defects or color shifts in the LCD panel itself. And the LED backlight should be extremely stable compared to a CCFL, meaning it should be more or less exactly the same brightness, uniformity and color temperature in 5+ years time.

Plus, there just aren't any other 24" IPS screens that are LED backlit even close to this price range (yet). The fact that it happens to be from Apple and double as a docking station is the icing on the cake for me.
 
Hah, if only. I bought an original (CoreDuo) 17" MBP, had 3 problems, was sent a brand new 2nd gen (C2D) after a year, had 3 problems, was sent a 4th gen (Penryn) after another year. Sold that one due to the screen buzzing... and now I'm on a "revision A" unibody Macbook that's perfect... finally. :D

I'm not sure the "rev A" theory ever applied to ACDs, but in my view an LED LCD is inherently different. Out of the box, you instantly know if there are any major defects or color shifts in the LCD panel itself. And the LED backlight should be extremely stable compared to a CCFL, meaning it should be more or less exactly the same brightness, uniformity and color temperature in 5+ years time.

Plus, there just aren't any other 24" IPS screens that are LED backlit even close to this price range (yet). The fact that it happens to be from Apple and double as a docking station is the icing on the cake for me.


I'd be more worried about the iSight, speakers, power system, etc etc etc
 
Pretty disappointing specs. A 14ms response time is very poor compared to some monitors shipping with 6ms or less. It only has a 330 cd/m^2 compared to others with 400. Is that because it's an LED?

It has been all but confirmed the 24" Cinema uses the same 24" H-IPS panel used in the 24" iMac, that screen is sold by NEC (with a different antiglare coating) for about $1000. Those things kick any PVA/TN screen's ass at viewing angle, color quality (shocked?) and visible colors. Response time is a small price to pay for display quality!



I guess we can all agree that this 24" Cinema Display is not intended for pros. iMac displays are terrible when it comes to color accuracy.

That would be true for the 20" iMacs which have been known to use PVA and sometimes TN panels. Dell's only IPS displays nowadays are extremely expensive.

The cheapest S-IPS 24"er you can pick up is an HP that costs $600.
 
I guess the good thing about this whole display port is that now I will be able to pick up a 23" or maybe even a 30" acd cheaper to hook up to my mbp. Woo-hoo!

Dont count on it. I was thinking along the same lines, and hey I dont know why people whined and complained yo no end about "when are we getting the new ACDs" there was nothing wrong with the previous generation....

so now that the new book friendly ACD was out, I was looking at getting a 23" on the cheap. Well NO! they are not available new or refurbished on line. So I went down to my Apple store and the kid said the new ACDs are coming next month before Christmas and the "old" ACDs are NOT at discount.
 
Have you actually looked at one? Glossy/glass screens, much like the iMac's current screens look pretty but they fatigue your eyes bc you have to fight glare. Yes, the colors look deeper and richer than matter screens but you can also see what is going on behind you.

Depends on the setting. Lots of lighting, especially sunlight makes for awful glare. An office with non direct lighting results in little to no glare.
 
For another $20, you can get the Bose In-Ear Headphone with different replaceable tips to match the size of your ear. Bose is a clear leader in this field at this price-point. I have to wonder sometimes what Apple is thinking when it decides on new products (and what to charge for them).

Bose must be spoon feeing you their marketing bull crap. That is the funniest thing I've heard, I'd recommend a pair of $9 JVC Mushrooms over Bose pathetic attempt at an IEM, do yourself a favor and have a listen to anything else in that price range by a truly reputable audio company.
 
It has been all but confirmed the 24" Cinema uses the same 24" H-IPS panel used in the 24" iMac, that screen is sold by NEC (with a different antiglare coating) for about $1000. Those things kick any PVA/TN screen's ass at viewing angle, color quality (shocked?) and visible colors. Response time is a small price to pay for display quality!

Are you sure its an NEC-made panel? The NEC 2490 (LCD2490WUXi to be exact) actually uses an LG panel, the LG-Philips LM240WU1. There is a slightly updated version of that panel which may be what is in the new 24" Apple. It is a fantastic panel nevertheless.

The cheapest S-IPS 24"er you can pick up is an HP that costs $600.

Correct, and then the slight steps up in cost from that are the LG 25.5" panels, used by the DoubleSight DS-265W and Planar PX2611W. But they tend to use B-grade or lower panels (meaning your chances of 1 or more dead/stuck pixels are high). The A-grades go to NEC's more expensive LCD2690WUXi.

Wish Apple would release this damn thing so we can learn more.
 
So will the glass plate ACD's give me only half a headache compared to the glossy panel coating?
And the headache is...?
Any type of gloss/glare, regardless of the technical configuration, is an automatic disqualification.
Gloss and glare are two separate things, and properly set up, there is no glare. If you are getting a headache due to the brightness of a "superbright" display, then again, you're talking about the coating and not just a glass panel. You need to adjust the brightness if that is the case.
 
http://www.sparkle.com.tw/News/DisplayPort/news_SP8800GT_Displayport_EN.html

Displayport ready 8800GT. :)

Anyways, I agree with some of the others. I see apple releasing a new breakaway cable for this monitor with DVI and usb attachments on it. Please, let this be true...

-Stell


When you say breakaway do you mean

(a) A separte cable that plugs into the screen replacing the existing cable
(b) a short adaptor set of cables that plug on the end of the existing cable

Does anyone know if the cable is detachable on the 24" LED Screen?

Edit: Looking at the gallery on the Apple website the cables do not seem to be on sockets.
 
Again.

This has happened before with the ADC connector on the first generation of cinema displays. Everyone complained about the proprietary adaptor. Apple sold an ADC<->VGA converter. Everyone complained it was just a cash grab. Then Apple released the current generation of displays and made a big deal about "we use the industry standard port now! No more converter!"

And now we've come full circle.

Smacks of arrogance, plain and simple. They've always wanted to lock you into proprietary connectors, and force you to pay extra for converters (if they're even available -- so far, no news of one for this display). Perhaps with ADC, sales and market share were too poor so Apple was forced to play nice. But now with marketshare on the rise again, they see this as an opportunity to show their true colors.

Not impressed, Apple.


I for one went with a third party ADC monitor thinking it would be single cable like my old Apple 17" Studio Display. Wrong! still had a power brick which plugged into the side of the ADC.

I kept it but now wish I hadn't and exchanged it for a DVI version. An upgrade to any new Mac H/W (now or future and even old G5) will require me to buy a new screen (or buy ADC adaptor - no chance).

If they go down the route of proprietary connector again my money will be elsewhere on a screen. Burnt once - not again.
 
Anyways, I agree with some of the others. I see apple releasing a new breakaway cable for this monitor with DVI and usb attachments on it. Please, let this be true...

Not gonna happen. It's DP only for the reasons I already mentioned. No HDMI, no DVI. Ever. Period.
 
I bet apple doesn't sell that many monitors. The ones they have are pretty expensive and I don't see too many MacBook or Mini owners spending as much for the monitor as they did their computer. Of course the iMac's have displays built in and the second monitor crowd there is probably also limited.

Still seems odd. When they announce the rest of the display line updates it may all make sense. It's on thing to have a single monitor posted as a notebook companion but doing so will all your new monitors and dropping the old models at the same time doesn't seem to make much sense.
 
The ones they have are pretty expensive...

Not at all, considering the panel type. They are aimed at professionals and people that know/need the difference between TN and IPS. This new 24" will sell quite well, and help drive sales of their new notebooks at the same time.
 
if it means anything, on the AppleStore site the LED screen just went from "Ships in 7-12 Days" to "Free Shipping".

Is it November yet, Apple???
 
I wish the new in-ears worked for the iPhone.

The fact that "the best iPod we've ever made" doesn't support the best headphones Apple makes is downright peculiar.

More whining about In-Ears and iPhone below; safe to skip.

I've never used the headphones that shipped with my iPhone 3G because I like my music to sound good, with some bass too (Koss do just fine). But what I would appreciate in Apple headphones is the remote and the possibility to answer calls without hassle while listening to music. Of course I'd expect the sound to be decent too, with that price tag and all the hype.

So, anyway, I for one would be totally ready to give Apple the 79€ they ask (yeah, the price here is equivalent to 100 USD currently - and still they blatantly point out price as the main breakthrough :rolleyes:) if only the In-Ears worked fully with iPhone. But if they prefer to make them incompatible, oh well, silly all-around.
 
The Apple store near me had the new 24" LED display out last night when I went in there... so, yeah, they're definitely shipping now.

The good: appeared to be an IPS panel -- colors stayed true even from extreme angles. Don't quote me on that though. I went to the extreme sides, but not really extreme vertically, so it could be a PVA/MVA panel I suppose, though it definitely seemed like an IPS panel.

The bad: Aside from the obvious fact that its useless to anyone without a brand new notebook, the screen is INSANELY reflective -- at least under the Apple store's lighting. To try to minimize the reflection, you have to turn up the brightness to levels where blacks become completely washed out as darkish grays.

They definitely sold me... on a Dell 2408WFP. Oh, well. I wanted a monitor with multiple (and more usable) inputs anyway.

And they didn't have the new in-ear headsets yet.
 
maybe dumb question (i'm catching up as fast as I can): Will the new In-ear Headphones, with mic, work on the new MacBook Pro for iChat, Skype, etc? AppleInsider seems to suggest so, but doesn't say specifically.
 
It has been all but confirmed the 24" Cinema uses the same 24" H-IPS panel used in the 24" iMac, that screen is sold by NEC (with a different antiglare coating) for about $1000.


And the link to this alleged "almost" confirmation is where?
 
The Apple store near me had the new 24" LED display out last night when I went in there... so, yeah, they're definitely shipping now.

Nope, the stores have had preprod models for a while.

The bad: Aside from the obvious fact that its useless to anyone without a brand new notebook, the screen is INSANELY reflective -- at least under the Apple store's lighting.

That would pretty much be absolute worst case. You can even see the glow from their lighting in the matte screens there. Either case is no where near a realistic use case.

They definitely sold me... on a Dell 2408WFP. Oh, well. I wanted a monitor with multiple (and more usable) inputs anyway.

Yikes, just know what you are getting yourself into. Horrendous input lag, crushed blacks, very sketchy QC... Dell needs to just save face and discontinue it, then make a 2409 that is what the 2408 should have been.

And the link to this alleged "almost" confirmation is where?

Who else makes 24" IPS LCD panels? Only LG, to my knowledge. There aren't that many options in IPS world.
 
Who else makes 24" IPS LCD panels? Only LG, to my knowledge. There aren't that many options in IPS world.

To answer a question with another question is totally useless.

Everyone is trying to determine if in fact Apple is using IPS panels or not.

Many people make 24" panels so the question remains...

where is a link that confirms Apple is using "IPS panels" in the new 24" display?
 
maybe dumb question (i'm catching up as fast as I can): Will the new In-ear Headphones, with mic, work on the new MacBook Pro for iChat, Skype, etc? AppleInsider seems to suggest so, but doesn't say specifically.

They should. I'd bet money on it. That is if I still had money, given this economy. It has an extra wire in it to handle the audio-in. The new MBPs have a port that accepts it.

Not at all, considering the panel type. They are aimed at professionals and people that know/need the difference between TN and IPS. This new 24" will sell quite well, and help drive sales of their new notebooks at the same time.

What about those who don't know what the difference between a TN and IPS is? I am new to the monitor scene and learning more and more. That's not to say I need an IPS. I can't really imagine when I would need it. I usually keep my computer room dark and don't do real work while at home.

What I do do (hehe do do) is work for graduate school. Nothing will ever be printed. A large chunk will be websites and the like. Lots and lots and lots of papers will be written.

I have a MBP because I wanted the "Cadillac" features and a good graphics card. (Been there, done that with integrated.) The reason I'd be in the market for a monitor is so I can have it like a docking station. I love speakers and everything else in this ACD. I wish they would have put an extra HD in there and did the audio through the mini-DP. Would have only needed to plug in two cables- maybe three with an extra HD in there.


So without the need for a IPS panel (Redundant?), why would I want this monitor? From a consumer standpoint, it's a nice expensive monitor. Really expensive. For professionals, it's a glossy good monitor worth the cost.

Being in the middle, I'm stuck. I want it. It looks very nice, but $900 or $800 with the student discount is a huge chunk of change. It's almost making me think of getting an iMac instead.

I am holding out on that iMac-like Docking Station we were talking about a little while ago. It seems to be the direction that Apple is going with the ACDs. I have my hopes going for a MWSF 09 launch or something after, but not too long after. For some reason, I would be willing to pony up the $900 for that. (Dumb wish, I know.)

What's the consumer or professional who does not need an IPS do?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.