So, what? You're in favor of hunting whales and putting more lead BACK into the iMacs?
I've made my low opinion of Greenpeace known already, but this is just silly. The goals that Greenpeace wants to accomplish are all totally valid and SHOULD be pursued. I just think there are other ways of doing it.
No my point is it easy to say everyone else is wrong and never offer a real solution. I am about if you have compliant or things are truly wrong you need to have a solution or be willing to help come up with a solution. But do not stand there and tell everyone else what they are doing is wrong and have you own actions being part of the issue.
i.e, greenpeace complained about 2 cycle engines and how much they polute, but you see them using 2 cycle engines. They talk about fossil fuels but they drive cars and use electricity. The best one was back in the 70's they told McDonnalds to stop using paper to wrap burges since it required trees to be cut down, so McDonnalds switch to Styrofoam and they applauded McDonnald move, but only to come back years later to tell them that Styrofoam was bad. They inpact the enviroment just like the rest of us but we are bad and they are good because they are doing it in the name of a higher cause.
I have yet to see any group who complains how bad we all are come to a table with a solutions that makes sense, meets the needs and does not impact the environment. They just tell us we are wrong.