I am a bit hesitant but this team is 4/5 of what i would have put down, and the 5th i am not sure about anyway, so i'll go YAY again.
if things seem to get fishy hopefully Moyank can use her get-out-of-jail-card
fenris, QoS and mscriv all used the same (relatively valid) argument for nay'ing. unfortunately, one of them did vote "fail" on mission one (unless it was moyank)
Do you want to gamble with a second failed mission on them?
If it goes through and fails, the only hope we'll have left is that we put the suspicious members on the next team and hope the right plots come up. Get more intel and then kill the mission.
Do you want to gamble with a second failed mission on them?
If it goes through and fails, the only hope we'll have left is that we put the suspicious members on the next team and hope the right plots come up. Get more intel and then kill the mission.
i was more of the idea that we start this one see/use the plots and then we evaluate whether to kill it or not with your no-confidence. it goes to 2 nays and you are up next
why would you ever put all the suspicious ones on a team?
I get me and QoS but why Astroboy? I've got him on my more suspicious list because of his voting mission 1@twietee:
6 agents
4 Infis
-dontpanic, twietee
4 agents, 4 infis
if you take out moyank too
3 agents, 4 infis
of those remaining, to me astroboy, fenris and QoS are slightly less suspicious
Not bad. Under Surveilance is pretty strong for the second match. Put Koodauw under surveilance? And proceed?
If we cancel this one we will have possibly two instead of one uncertain players.
edit: but yep, no confidence is made in heaven, not sure about cancellation. What do others think?
Any reason for preferring Koodauw to Astroboy as the one to put under surveilance?Not bad. Under Surveilance is pretty strong for the second match. Put Koodauw under surveilance? And proceed?
If we cancel this one we will have possibly two instead of one uncertain players.
edit: but yep, no confidence is made in heaven, not sure about cancellation. What do others think?
Agreed. With Me and DP coming up as team leaders going in with 1 question mark is better than going in with 2.
Any reason for preferring Koodauw to Astroboy as the one to put under surveilance?
I was just considering the same thing. Abuse the no confidence to get more plot cards and see who we clear then rest back to WoodNUFC proposing a similar team depending on who we've cleared at that point.Well, ravenvii will curse us but we could just cancel this and then go on mission with WoodNUFC leading (strong leadershipping). That should give us better chances to clear one other. It's important, that under surveilance loses every power if we lose the next one.
We could also cancel this + the next one and WoodNUFC strong leaderships the third. By then we should be able to clear you (DP and me) + one other + the player under surveilance. Boring play somewhat but best odds to win the second and lose some serious pressure (would be quite hard for traitors to win the game then I fancy)
ok - just wondering since both you and DP seem to have Astroboy as slightly more trustworthy than Koodauw whereas I have them the other way round.Not really. Slightly better vibes from Astroboy (despite his vote day1) somehow. Doesn't really matter I guess.
We could also cancel this + the next one and WoodNUFC strong leaderships the third one (second match still). By then we should be able to clear you (DP and me) + one other + keep the player under surveilance. Boring play somewhat but best odds to win the second and lose some serious pressure (would be quite hard for traitors to win the game then I fancy)
Note by doing that we would have pulled out all the cards by that point and we would only get 1 more for the rest of the missions.I was just considering the same thing. Abuse the no confidence to get more plot cards and see who we clear then rest back to WoodNUFC proposing a similar team depending on who we've cleared at that point.