Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I do. I have 2 MacBooks but when I want to edit on my phone its nice to have a fast processor.
Its also good for the other things I mentioned. Controlling speakers and mixers, using the phone as
synth etc..sorry you don't know what you're talking about.
[doublepost=1505356567][/doublepost]
Dude you love samsung you hate apple, we get it.
Just be happy with your stuff and move on.

But you cannot deny...no matter how fast the processor is...it doesn't stop this...smh :eek:

tapatalk_1505358181771.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: RogerWilco
I believe the upcoming intel mobile chips are way more powerful than the existing ones
If you're talking about Coffee Lake...not really. The biggest difference is that they will have a 15W quad core SKU, whereas that used to be a dual core. The base speed is going to take a hit though. Single core score won't be better.

The process "tick" at Cannonlake, down to 10 nm, might have some significant gains down at the lower power end. We won't see those until some time in 2018 though.

Maybe the next MBP will have a A12X Bionic in it to phase out the x86 chipset.
No way. The Apple chips are only comparable to the Intel 5W fanless variety in the MacBook.

The base CPU in the 13" MBP depending on nonTB(15W) or TB(28W) still stomps all over the Apple A series handily. You're comparing a BB gun to a howitzer. Geekbench is not a good cross architecture comparison tool.

Look at the Core M-5Y71, a 5W CPU in the Asus T300, in the SPECint_base2006 benchmark. It beats the A9X in every category.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/9766/the-apple-ipad-pro-review/4

The i7-6700K is in an entirely different universe.
 
Last edited:
You prefer names like, ice cream sandwich?
Give the android devs a break, Google has to give a nod to the preferred foods its work force of metabolic endomorphs consume as they toil away their lives in darkness.

iOS devs are maintained by a steady stream of 2nd hand flatulence pumped directly to their cubicles from the executive offices by a network of microscopically-sealed ducts. It's rumored that the new spaceship building has concentrators so these rare gasses can be recycled and reused as needed to keep up morale and vigor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fourthtunz
I think there are VERY real reasons to be concerned. Nobody knows when that camera comes on, what it records, who has access to the data, etc. We already know what the CIA and NSA are capable of. This, along with Amazon Alexa, are a dream come true for spying and God only knows what else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamesrick80
Ah, here we go again.

The iPhone can't do everything a MacBook can, and it can't fit my needs 100% for business? Must mean nobody could use it for business.

I own a couple small businesses. If necessary, I could quite easily run my businesses exclusively from the iPhone X. I have a MacBook Pro and iPad mini because they are better for my needs, but mostly because of the bigger screens. I'm obviously doing things that the iPhone can already do well, but are you really that short-sighted to think that NOBODY can do "real work" on the iPhone, or are you just trying to be provocative?

I await your list of tasks the iPhone can't do, while you attempt to classify those things as "real work" and anything else the iPhone can do is not real work. Using the word "toy" is common in these arguments, but it's up to you.

  • Please show me Xcode running on an iPhone.
  • Show me Excel for iOS running a VBA script.
  • Show me Microsoft Access on iOS.
  • Show me taking a file from an ordinary USB flash drive, uploading to an iPhone, then copying that file to a network drive
  • Show me your file browser in iOS 10 or below

That's just a few off the top of my head. I'm sure many people could add to the list of work that an iPhone either can't do, or is nearly worthless at. You obviously don't use Excel at all, or at least not to any level that I do, because I refuse to even open a spreadsheet on my iPhone, let alone try to actually get any work done in one.
 
Last edited:
As for outperforming the A10X, that’s good but not so good that a 3 month old ‘PC replacement’ is outperformed by a phone by the same company, however it was to be expected.
If they’re going to release the iPads so close to the iPhone then they should include the next generation processor in it first like they used to do.

Like they used to?
All flagship iPads since at least iPad 3 has used the X chip (with the exception of iPad Air 1 which used the same A7 as the 5s) that is faster than the previous generation iPhone but slower than the next generation.
 
And yet people still thinks Apple is not innovative because they don't have a stylus or curved screen.

The day we see an Ax based Macbook is getting closer.
 
Gotta love the good jokes. Mac switching to ARM would be the day it officially dies. No more ports from Windows all the while having an overall slower performance. Good thing their engineers aren't as easily fooled by misleading synthetic benchmarks such as Geek Bench like the average joes in here. Mac + ARM = Windows phone. Weak 3rd party support.
 
  • Like
Reactions: potassium404
Gotta love the good jokes. Mac switching to ARM would be the day it officially dies. No more ports from Windows all the while having an overall slower performance. Good thing their engineers aren't as easily fooled by misleading synthetic benchmarks such as Geek Bench like the average joes in here. Mac + ARM = Windows phone. Weak 3rd party support.

Rosetta mean anything? Just saying...
 
All this power of the iPhone X could be used for super features on iOS but nope they instead use it for creating Animoji.

#killme

Animoji is basically the tech demo-ware for the underlying stuff. The cool stuff always comes from 3rd party apps.
 
Sounds like Apple are dangerously close, hardware wise, to being able to launch a none Intel MacBook.

Hardware wise, maybe, but software is the hard part. macOS can't just switch to using ARM architecture because all of the apps would need to be rewritten and / or recompiled, which would take many years. Microsoft tried to do it. Just look at how few popular Windows apps are able to run on ARM Windows tablets after all these years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: potassium404
Please show me Xcode running on an iPhone.
Show me Excel for iOS running a VBA script.
Show me Microsoft Access on iOS.
Show me taking a file from an ordinary USB flash drive, uploading to an iPhone, then copying that file to a network drive
Show me your file browser in iOS 10 or below

That's just a few off the top of my head. I'm sure many people could add to the list of work that an iPhone either can't do, or is nearly worthless at. You obviously don't use Excel at all, or at least not to any level that I do, because I refuse to even open a spreadsheet on my iPhone, let alone try to actually get any work done in one.
You can’t blame Apple for excel, blame Microsoft for not putting all the features into the mobile app. Same as most other apps that people complain about. Also lol at saying something they’re fixing with the latest software.
 
Also kicks the MacBooks butt with emoji!
[doublepost=1505366493][/doublepost]
You can’t blame Apple for excel, blame Microsoft for not putting all the features into the mobile app. Same as most other apps that people complain about. Also lol at saying something they’re fixing with the latest software.

The point is , it's not a laptop and a closed OS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IG88
Well that won’t be the case next year with the quad-core 13” MacBook Pros. But impressive nonetheless.
As for outperforming the A10X, that’s good but not so good that a 3 month old ‘PC replacement’ is outperformed by a phone by the same company, however it was to be expected.
If they’re going to release the iPads so close to the iPhone then they should include the next generation processor in it first like they used to do.

Uh, it's "beating" some real PCs and Macs too so...
 
Last edited:
Geeeez. That's damn powerful for such a small device.

And completely unnecessary. It's a phone for goodness sake! What kind of hardcore tasks will you do on your phone anyways? It's perfect for bragging rights, but it's usefulness in the real world is debatable.
 
Gotta love the good jokes. Mac switching to ARM would be the day it officially dies. No more ports from Windows all the while having an overall slower performance. Good thing their engineers aren't as easily fooled by misleading synthetic benchmarks such as Geek Bench like the average joes in here. Mac + ARM = Windows phone. Weak 3rd party support.

Yup. Just because you are a tech gadget enthusiast consumer doesn't necessarily mean you know the market...

Praying that Apple puts a touchscreen on a Mac running MacOS is another one of those "good jokes". Shoehorn touch capabilities into an UI that's rooted in keyboard/mouse/trackpad-centric input would be a disaster for Apple. Look at Microsoft's touch-based apps ecosystem and you'll ge the idea. Apple already has a touch OS champion, it's called iOS. Apple will work on adding more "pro" features to it and that makes more sense than have two touch-enabled OS' that will simply confuse everyone, including developers, which would slow down adoption and support -- a nightmare.
 
Last edited:
But you cannot deny...no matter how fast the processor is...it doesn't stop this...smh :eek:

View attachment 717569

Is this real life?

Like, right now I'm assuming its a joke. Please tell me that's a joke.
[doublepost=1505367780][/doublepost]
Like they used to?
All flagship iPads since at least iPad 3 has used the X chip (with the exception of iPad Air 1 which used the same A7 as the 5s) that is faster than the previous generation iPhone but slower than the next generation.

But the iPads got the chips first.
 
All of this can be done perfectly fast enough on a A9 so what's your point.

Apple said it themselves. They are going where the puck will be, not where it's been. Just because you can't see a use for all that power, it doesn't mean others can't.
 
You can’t blame Apple for excel, blame Microsoft for not putting all the features into the mobile app. Same as most other apps that people complain about. Also lol at saying something they’re fixing with the latest software.
Read what I was responding to please. He asked for a list of tasks an iPhone can't do, work related. That Microsoft gimped it is hardly the point. Anyone that claims they get "work done" in Excel on an iPhone is either a blatant liar or they're basically using it to make grocery lists.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.