It is precisely as laughable as saying Flash is open.
parts of Flash are open source, such as the Flex SDK. i've contributed code to it.
It is precisely as laughable as saying Flash is open.
How can you possibly make that argument when you found it necessary to make fun of my wife as a user for not wanting to use Flash when it didn't work for her the way she wanted?
It took all of 2 posts to be a hypocrite, congratulations.
hm, i think that was Xerox that Apple stole that from.
NOBODY IS USING HTML 5!
Agreed.
I missed part of last night's episode of Glee. Would I be able to bring up Fox's site on the iPad, and re-watch the episode? Nope.
FLASH is pretty darn ubiquitous today. What's the use of an iPad if it can't access easily available Web content?
Because I'm speaking like an end user, who sees the difference.
I know that Youtube HTML 5 isn't as good as YouTube FLASH.
DUH!
You all might know more technical stuff than me, but you can't hide the end-user experience in the end and even lots of the technical people have said HTML 5 isn't quite there yet.
Like I've said many times, if it WORKS I'm for it. Right now HTML 5 doesn't work for most end users as a complete replacement for Flash on Macs, PCs, or phones.
Thank you for summing up my point.
I'm not even in favor of FLASH either!
People just want a $500 device to work!
hm, i think that was Xerox that Apple stole that from.
Xerox designed the first mouse. Apple implemented mouse and a graphical interface for personal computing.
Flash doesn't work on a single phone. What the hell are you talking about?
Everyone knows FLASH doesn't work well on Macs, I've criticized both Apple AND Adobe for this.
My biggest point now is that this impasse does not help consumers at all.
And living in a cave and avoiding FLASH is not a better solution either.![]()
the iPad is not a phone.
parts of Flash are open source, such as the Flex SDK. i've contributed code to it.
It's not better than a computer or a netbook either!
But it costs more! LOL
You're wrong, and obviously don't know anything about the things you're talking about. People are using HTML5, and not in betas. And no, it doesn't have all the features of Flash, because that isn't what it is. Flash doesn't have all the features of HTML5 either. HTML5 isn't a "format". Why are you using all these words when you don't know what they mean?
People just want a $500 device to work!
You just hit on the point that everyone has been trying to explain to you. Congratulations! (Seriously.) If Adobe is not willing or able to make their "cross platform" solution be truly cross-platform (and it's not just Macs, it doesn't work properly on any mobile device either) it HARMS end users to "work something out" or just cave and allow them to keep doing what they're doing. Moving to a set of technologies that do work is the answer--though it doesn't address the development environment.
Of course not. And?