"$139" - that gets you no apps, no extra functionality, no nothing.
It also gets you about $400 extra in your pocket.
"$139" - that gets you no apps, no extra functionality, no nothing.
In case you are planning to visit northern Australia; watch out for The Irukandji [Carukua barnesi] jellyfish a nearly invisible killer found in the sea, with a deathly sting."Sorry, I have a 300$ netbook, and it's fully charged, here it is actually... Look, you can even view Flash content and I have access to all my desktop applications, my work's VPN and all my tools. Now that I mention it, I better get back to work, my vacation is in 2 weeks, I can't wait to be sitting on a real beach instead of pool side here."
Sad fact is ... shiny glossy screens sell more in the stores... then the owners of the new shiny hardware are left squinting and wondering why they cant read beyond the reflection in many settings.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_1_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile/7E18 Safari/528.16)
Thinking about getting a Kindle actually. Weren't they $359 when they came out 2 years ago?
I'd bet money they'll be $99 by Christmas!
Wait for 3 months and save an extra $40...absolutely!
Did you see the Apple commercial with the Kindle owner trying to read a book in a dimly lit environment?
Great ad, but, who reads in direct sunlights, by a pool no less, with a device that costs that much![]()
5 minutes later, she turns to him:
"Excuse me sir, are you web browsing, playing games, and watching video on your e-reader?"
"I'm trying but can't see anything with real light around, wish I was back in my basement."
Yeah, but that doesn't change the fact that battery life on the Kindle is significantly greater than battery life on the "magical device." Unless you want to attach yourself to a USB port, the Kindle is still better here.
Of course, iPad has its advantages, like the color screen, faster page turning, and less klunky UI.
Apple can easily refuted it with an ad depicting the man reading on the bed with his wife/girl sleeping at the side, without any lighting in the room.
Now, think of it. Is it more frequent and practical reading in the comfort of room or reading at the pool side in the risk of sunburn?
And, guys, half the population on the globe try their best to avoid direct sunlight.
If over 10 hours isn't enough battery life(probably a lot more if strictly reading)I'd love to know why.
Apple can easily refuted it with an ad depicting the man reading on the bed with his wife/girl sleeping at the side, without any lighting in the room.
Now, think of it. Is it more frequent and practical reading in the comfort of room or reading at the pool side in the risk of sunburn?
And, guys, half the population on the globe try their best to avoid direct sunlight.
Yes, Amazon Ad....
If you had spent the money you did on the kindle (3G version) and sunglasses, you'd have an iPad!
Oh, you don't want an iPad? Well, your going to be required to purchase a pair of sunglasses (for protection of course) if you'd like to like to partake in what the add is suggesting.
So what has this add showed us?
"That the kindle excels over the iPad where only few can be or want to go unless wearing the proper protection"!
Double major in Business HR and Marketing
reading on a backlit screen always causes eye strain.
the light is going right at your face from the source, instead of being projected from somewhere else onto a page (or onto your Kindle screen).
It's 100% better for reading.
Yes, Amazon Ad....
If you had spent the money you did on the kindle (3G version) and sunglasses, you'd have an iPad!
So what has this add showed us?
"That the kindle excels over the iPad where only few can be or want to go unless wearing the proper protection"!
Double major in Business HR and Marketing