Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Here, Here. And who wants a tablet in their pocket, it's phone.

Let's nip this one in the bud. Both of the Nexus S and Galaxy S II have larger screens and they are still "phones" barely larger than the iPhone 4.
 

Attachments

  • 20111003_084927.jpg
    20111003_084927.jpg
    391.3 KB · Views: 125
  • 20111003_084721.jpg
    20111003_084721.jpg
    253.2 KB · Views: 103
  • IMG_20111003_084856.jpg
    IMG_20111003_084856.jpg
    270.8 KB · Views: 87
  • IMG_20111003_084932.jpg
    IMG_20111003_084932.jpg
    149.4 KB · Views: 93
Let's nip this one in the bud. Both of the Nexus S and Galaxy S II have larger screens and they are still "phones" barely larger than the iPhone 4.

they must have baby hands for a few millimeters to make such a difference
 
Mr. Negative,

Yup.

And I'd be shocked if any of the apps written in the near future (read: 8-12 months) will take advantage of this so as to not to alienate the legacy hardware in the iP4.

Big speed increase that you won't see any real benefit from for some time.

Oh, and good luck enjoying your fast graphics with a shattered glass back or glass screen because the iPhone 4S continued to use fragile build materials and refused to put a protective bezel around the phone to protect the edges from direct shattering impacts.

This will be an awesome device. My brother and many of my friends have IP4s and they take drops very well, which is amazing with all of that glass. I personally have a Droid X which I have dropped many times, even once onto a large rock directly onto the screen. All of these modern devices are amazing in almost every way. I get frustrated with my X but I do not hate it. Why do you hate the iPhone so much?
 
The sharks on Wall Street would immediately start circling Tim Cook if his first major product announcement was a dud like this.

As I wrote in the other iPhone articles the worlds media in all genres are going to have a field day around Tim Cook if all they launch is, even if most of us know differently, new insides into a floored item in the eyes of the mainstream media!
 
- the current iPhone 4 already runs like butter (including games)

Only by severely limiting what is done with those games. The GPU in the iPhone 4 simply cannot handle the retina display resolution very well, it's just too slow and limited.

--Eric
 
i don't get people that's not happy with the iPhone 4S and will switch to android.

you really need to throw away of all your iOS apps that you bought since couple of years ago just for an android specs?

my galaxy S2 doesn't feel any faster than my iPhone 4 and the reality i feel my iPhone 4 is much more fluid, smoother experience than my non natural browser scrolling on the SGS2, never mind the jumping scrolling when i decided to tap to stop the scrolling in android browser.

Ever heard of Opera Mini or Dolphin?
 
I want a larger screen but I don't want a larger phone. If Apple really has magical abilities, they should be able to make this happen.
 
Remember that dedicated consoles and handhelds perform a generation beyond comparably specced PCs and phones because they have lower level APIs. - John Carmack.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A5313e Safari/7534.48.3)

Ed91 said:
You're funny. Wonder how my iPhone 4 has survived so many falls on hard surfaces. Must be because it's extremely fragile.

Same. I know I'm careless, but anytime someone talks to me about the glass being fragile, I get my iPhone 4 out and drop it by "accident." I'm sure it'll bite me in the ass one day, but these phones are not fragile.

I wouldn't go as far as dropping it on purpose but I can testify that I dropped my iPhone 3GS not long back from the fourth floor in the stair well. It took a couple of knocks from stairs on the way down based on the noise. I fumbled it when I got it out of my pocket. I was devastated. But when I seen it I couldn't believe it! Not a scratch!!!
 
I really like the iPhone 4 design, so I don't mind if there's no change to the case.

That said, I have an iPhone 4 with 2.5 months contract left on it and when I'm contract free, I'll get a cheaper tariff for however long before the next iPhone after this comes out, mainly because I can't imagine tomorrow's unveil is going to be as big a product evolution as the 3GS -> iPhone 4 was.

Also, the iPhone 4 is an amazing phone still....Mine is 15 months old and looks brand new, the battery is still in great shape and it does so much. I actually get a kick out of using Apple products for a long time....They're designed to last. Makes it all the more sweet when you do actually upgrade as well....My last phone before this was the original iPhone.
 
The A5 means better games in the future. I hope we can see soon games with graphics like PS2 or something.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A5313e Safari/7534.48.3)

What is the chances of the iPhone 4 processor being turned up to its potential 1ghz?

This said, ios5 beta 7 on ip4 here and it's very fast, I don't see how it could run faster, not on day to day tasks anyway! I suppose the benchmark numbers might show its quicker but will we actually notice it when for example, sending a text message or checking Facebook?
 
If you not dare, explain how can a dual core 1.2 Ghz be slower than a 1Ghz Dual core, its just not logic tome, i don't believe in that benchmark!

Even if you believe that light travels with 30.000 km/s, it still travels with 300.000 km/s. So it does not matter what you "think".

And the GHz are not very important in todays processors, because each newer generation has more load/store units, which load data from the RAM in the processor cache, and which store data from the processor cache to the RAM. This is what makes modern processors much faster. Sandy Bridge is such an example. x264 developers needed more parallel memory access, and they got it. The result is that x264 is dramatically faster on Sandy Bridge CPUs. The same applies to non-Intel ARM-CPUs. The lower nanometer structures allow more memory load/store units, without increasing the temperature of the semiconductor material.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)

Maschil said:
looks like im getting a samsung infuse 4g LOL

Oh no, poor you. Did you lose your job or your sanity?
 
I'm really hoping not but... it's quite possible the iPhone 4S will only have one SGX543. The iPad 2 has a significantly larger battery compared to the iPad 1, and it only outperforms the iPad 1 by an hour or so.

The A5 shouldn't be a problem CPU-wise, but having an SGX543MP2 might kill the battery too quickly.

How much power does a single SGX543 use compared to the SGX535? I know it has about twice the performance.
 
I'm really hoping not but... it's quite possible the iPhone 4S will only have one SGX543. The iPad 2 has a significantly larger battery compared to the iPad 1, and it only outperforms the iPad 1 by an hour or so.

The A5 shouldn't be a problem CPU-wise, but having an SGX543MP2 might kill the battery too quickly.

How much power does a single SGX543 use compared to the SGX535? I know it has about twice the performance.

http://crave.cnet.co.uk/laptops/ipa...ry-512mb-of-ram-and-ninja-grade-gpu-50003127/

Bigger battery? Yes. But not much bigger. From the article linked: " the iPad 2's battery is a 3.8V 25W-hour unit -- "just a hair more than the original iPad's 24.8W-hours".
 
Even if you believe that light travels with 30.000 km/s, it still travels with 300.000 km/s. So it does not matter what you "think".

And the GHz are not very important in todays processors, because each newer generation has more load/store units, which load data from the RAM in the processor cache, and which store data from the processor cache to the RAM. This is what makes modern processors much faster. Sandy Bridge is such an example. x264 developers needed more parallel memory access, and they got it. The result is that x264 is dramatically faster on Sandy Bridge CPUs. The same applies to non-Intel ARM-CPUs. The lower nanometer structures allow more memory load/store units, without increasing the temperature of the semiconductor material.

First of all i don't know what this has todo with lightspeed now, but its ok. Thz for the reasonable explaination and a good one too.
 
The A5 chip in iPad is too big and power hungry for the phones. A5 for iPhone will have the same core but GPU part (and other modules) might be changed so it is very likely that iPhone will not have the same GPU performance as iPad.

Quote: "Right away the primary observation is that the A5 is a VERY BIG IC, with a processor die size of 12.1 x 10.1 mm. You'll recall that the Apple A4 was a package-on-package with the processor and its supporting memory stacked one capsule atop another and it had a processor die size of 7.3mm x 7.3mm."
It's possible that one of the reasons for the delay with the next iPhone was due to Apple doing a die shrink for just the reasons you mention. I speculated about this a few weeks ago here: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1228143/

It's also true that the clock speed might need to be lowered more than some people are expecting and/or the GPU down-speced a bit. With the current market expectations set by the competition though, I find it hard to imagine that the CPU won't be a dual core Cortex-A9 based design, i.e. an A5 as far as the CPU is concerned.

- Julian
 
Looks like Arn is trying to get out ahead of the inevitable disappointment come Tuesday when the Jesusphone doesn't have every far-fetched expectation that the drones here have heaped on it. Personally I think an A5 upgrade with a better camera is perfectly acceptable, but maybe that's not enough "pizazz" for everyone.

I highly doubt that the A5 they shoehorn into the iPhone is going to run at the same clocks as the iPad. Same as it was with the A4. So the performance tests of the iPad2 are most likely not the level of performance you'll see from an A5 in an iPhone. It'll probably have the same 20% or so underclock that was in the iPhone4 in comparison to the iPad.

Performance will still be good, but all posting a bunch of graphs from the iPad2 is going to do is convince all the drones that it's the same performance as the iPad2, which is exactly what happened the last time around with the iPhone4/iPad.
 
looks like im getting a samsung infuse 4g LOL

Honestly, anyone who would abandon an entire platform just because of phone hardware is really just in the market for a phone. So, good luck to you.

Personally, I don't really care for mobile phones, but since we pretty much have to have one these days, it doesn't matter what the hardware looks like as far as I'm concerned... What matters is that it won't become obsolete before the contract expires and that it works well with my iMac and iPad.

Furthermore, why would you make a stupid statement like that without waiting until the product is actually released... Do you really want people to know you're an idiot before you even get the chance to actually prove how stupid you are?
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)



I have dropped my iPhone 4 many times and it has never broken.

Also many apps have already been updated to take advantage of a dual core A5 processor after the iPad 2. If a developer adds optimization for A5, which they will before or shortly after release, it doesn't mean that their apps won't be compatible with A5 or anything that comes before that.

I dropped mine twice and it broke both times. Both at waist level. A case is a must because the little thing is slippery.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.