Here, Here. And who wants a tablet in their pocket, it's phone.
Let's nip this one in the bud. Both of the Nexus S and Galaxy S II have larger screens and they are still "phones" barely larger than the iPhone 4.
Here, Here. And who wants a tablet in their pocket, it's phone.
Let's nip this one in the bud. Both of the Nexus S and Galaxy S II have larger screens and they are still "phones" barely larger than the iPhone 4.
Yup.
And I'd be shocked if any of the apps written in the near future (read: 8-12 months) will take advantage of this so as to not to alienate the legacy hardware in the iP4.
Big speed increase that you won't see any real benefit from for some time.
Oh, and good luck enjoying your fast graphics with a shattered glass back or glass screen because the iPhone 4S continued to use fragile build materials and refused to put a protective bezel around the phone to protect the edges from direct shattering impacts.
The sharks on Wall Street would immediately start circling Tim Cook if his first major product announcement was a dud like this.
- the current iPhone 4 already runs like butter (including games)
i don't get people that's not happy with the iPhone 4S and will switch to android.
you really need to throw away of all your iOS apps that you bought since couple of years ago just for an android specs?
my galaxy S2 doesn't feel any faster than my iPhone 4 and the reality i feel my iPhone 4 is much more fluid, smoother experience than my non natural browser scrolling on the SGS2, never mind the jumping scrolling when i decided to tap to stop the scrolling in android browser.
Ed91 said:You're funny. Wonder how my iPhone 4 has survived so many falls on hard surfaces. Must be because it's extremely fragile.
Same. I know I'm careless, but anytime someone talks to me about the glass being fragile, I get my iPhone 4 out and drop it by "accident." I'm sure it'll bite me in the ass one day, but these phones are not fragile.
If anything I believe the iPhone 5 will be sporting the new A6 chip.
LOL DUDE its a phone for goodness sake...
If you not dare, explain how can a dual core 1.2 Ghz be slower than a 1Ghz Dual core, its just not logic tome, i don't believe in that benchmark!
Maschil said:looks like im getting a samsung infuse 4g LOL
I'm really hoping not but... it's quite possible the iPhone 4S will only have one SGX543. The iPad 2 has a significantly larger battery compared to the iPad 1, and it only outperforms the iPad 1 by an hour or so.
The A5 shouldn't be a problem CPU-wise, but having an SGX543MP2 might kill the battery too quickly.
How much power does a single SGX543 use compared to the SGX535? I know it has about twice the performance.
Even if you believe that light travels with 30.000 km/s, it still travels with 300.000 km/s. So it does not matter what you "think".
And the GHz are not very important in todays processors, because each newer generation has more load/store units, which load data from the RAM in the processor cache, and which store data from the processor cache to the RAM. This is what makes modern processors much faster. Sandy Bridge is such an example. x264 developers needed more parallel memory access, and they got it. The result is that x264 is dramatically faster on Sandy Bridge CPUs. The same applies to non-Intel ARM-CPUs. The lower nanometer structures allow more memory load/store units, without increasing the temperature of the semiconductor material.
It's possible that one of the reasons for the delay with the next iPhone was due to Apple doing a die shrink for just the reasons you mention. I speculated about this a few weeks ago here: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1228143/The A5 chip in iPad is too big and power hungry for the phones. A5 for iPhone will have the same core but GPU part (and other modules) might be changed so it is very likely that iPhone will not have the same GPU performance as iPad.
Quote: "Right away the primary observation is that the A5 is a VERY BIG IC, with a processor die size of 12.1 x 10.1 mm. You'll recall that the Apple A4 was a package-on-package with the processor and its supporting memory stacked one capsule atop another and it had a processor die size of 7.3mm x 7.3mm."
Ah, I see. The iFixit tear-down shows the iPad 2's battery taking up more space, but it must be thinner. Thanks for that!http://crave.cnet.co.uk/laptops/ipa...ry-512mb-of-ram-and-ninja-grade-gpu-50003127/
Bigger battery? Yes. But not much bigger. From the article linked: " the iPad 2's battery is a 3.8V 25W-hour unit -- "just a hair more than the original iPad's 24.8W-hours".
looks like im getting a samsung infuse 4g LOL
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)
I have dropped my iPhone 4 many times and it has never broken.
Also many apps have already been updated to take advantage of a dual core A5 processor after the iPad 2. If a developer adds optimization for A5, which they will before or shortly after release, it doesn't mean that their apps won't be compatible with A5 or anything that comes before that.