Wait, so it is an eclair? they named their software after and used a....donut/piece of lame food?! WTF?
Hey, Eclairs are great
Wait, so it is an eclair? they named their software after and used a....donut/piece of lame food?! WTF?
Nope. I compared it with "every single current Android device" to quote you.
Hey, Eclairs are great![]()
Is the icon they use with the section titles an eclair? Why?
I mean, I would love to have the ability to play AVI, DIVX, and many other formats on my iPhone without having to convert this or that, but I can't. But I love my iPhone still, because in my humble opinion, the phone is the simplest, most easy to use, and elegantly laid out platform. But that's a personal choice that is right for me. Other things might be important to someone else.
This is why if you are an iPhone User it is even more in your interest that the Android OS does well. Apple needs a push to keep it from resting on its laurels.
The resting on your laurels happens more often than we want to think about. Also it is not a new thing. MS did it but got away with it with Excel until Lotus 123 came. Excel stayed at version 1 for years, resting. Then in the MS-DOS area Lotus 123 refused to come out with a graphics version because they rested. Now how many people remember Lotus 123.
Apple needs to be pushed. For some time Android will not be able to rest or it will go away before it has a chance to be used.
Android has the ability to give Apple a push. I was hoping that Palm would be able to do it also, but it is only one company that everyone seems to want to make totally irrelevant.
You always end your initial posts with (insert product/business here) IS DEAD.
What's up with that?
What will drive me to the Android is my lack of signal from AT&T.
What you are saying is completely true. The issue comes when someone says something along the lines of the "the iPhone is the greatest phone out there, everything else sucks", because this is also a matter of preference and personal opinion.
What you are saying is completely true. The issue comes when someone says something along the lines of the "the iPhone is the greatest phone out there, everything else sucks", because this is also a matter of preference and personal opinion.
LOL! I was thinking the same thing. Either that, or mud on a brick.
A smartphone IS A computer! Hell, smartphones can emulate other computers / consoles! ( Even that iPhone can manage that one! C64)
I've found multi-tasking to be extremely useful.. for example, running an IM client along with some other application. So, to be able to talk to some one and doing other things as well.
Or, the ability to run a system utility in the background , i.e., for example, an app that will switch profiles at a given time, or turn Bluetooth on or off on a schedule.
To lug a computer around isn't always feasible or convenient!
"Why would you want to multi-task?" I bet your same comment was made when such functionality became possible on home computers.
16 September 2009
ARM Announces 2GHz Capable Cortex-A9 Dual Core Processor Implementation
ARM Cortex processor technology and physical IP developed in unison to deliver high performance and low-power processing for consumer and enterprise markets
CAMBRIDGE, UK – Sept. 16, 2009 – ARM [(LSE: ARM); (Nasdaq: ARMH)] announced today the development of two Cortex™-A9 MPCore™ hard macro implementations for the TSMC 40nm-G process, enabling silicon manufacturers to have a rapid and low-risk route to silicon for high-performance, low-power Cortex-A9 processor-based devices. The speed-optimized hard macro implementation will enable devices to operate at frequencies greater than 2GHz.
The dual core hard macro implementations are the result of ARM’s significant investment in advanced physical IP development in unison with processor and fabric IP technology, and leading-edge implementation flows from the EDA industry. Advanced physical IP techniques have enabled critical circuits within the design to be replaced with highly tuned logic cells and memories, increasing performance while lowering overall power consumption.
Speed Optimized
The Cortex-A9 speed-optimized hard macro implementation will provide system designers with an industry standard ARM® processor incorporating aggressive low-power techniques to further extend ARM’s performance leadership into high-margin consumer and enterprise devices within the power envelope necessary for compact, high-density and thermally constrained environments. This hard macro implementation operates in excess of 2GHz when selected from typical silicon and represents an ideal solution for high-margin performance-oriented applications.
Power Optimized
In many thermally constrained applications such as set-top boxes, DTVs, printers and other feature-rich consumer and high-density enterprise applications, energy efficiency is of paramount importance. The Cortex-A9 power-optimized hard macro implementation delivers its peak performance of 4000 DMIPS while consuming less than 250mW per CPU when selected from typical silicon.
The hard macro implementations include ARM AMBA®-compliant high performance system components to maximize data traffic speed and minimize power consumption and silicon area. Each Cortex-A9 hard macro implementation also includes the CoreSight™ Program Trace Macrocell (PTM) which provides full visibility into the processor’s instruction flow, enabling the software community to develop code for optimal performance.
“The Cortex-A9 MPCore processor has already been widely accepted as the processor of choice for high-performance embedded applications across a broad spectrum of demanding consumer and enterprise devices,” said Eric Schorn, VP marketing, Processor Division, ARM. “ARM’s parallel development of advanced, optimized physical IP components demonstrates a new level of collaborative differentiation while enabling our Partners to expand their penetration into high margin domains traditionally occupied by proprietary architectures.”
“ARM’s long-standing investment in low-power leadership and ability to develop such high-performance devices enables licensees to lower the cost and risk of entering the high-margin markets currently addressed with competing proprietary solutions,” said Will Strauss, principal analyst at Forward Concepts. “With single-thread performance capable of supporting very intensive workloads, the unprecedented level of power efficiency will enable licensees to introduce compelling new products.”
“ARM and TSMC have enjoyed a long standing relationship of collaboration to ensure the development and delivery of best-in-class products optimized for our manufacturing process,” said ST Juang, Sr. Director, Design Infrastructure Marketing Division, TSMC. “This provides OEMs developing feature-rich consumer and enterprise devices access to TSMC’s manufacturing excellence and the power of ARM processor IP”
Both ARM dual core Cortex-A9 hard macros will share a common seven-power domain, dual-NEON™ technology configuration supporting SMP (symmetrical multiprocessing) operating systems with up to 8MB of Level2 cache memory and will be delivered with all scripts, vectors and libraries required to integrate the macro directly within any SoC device.
To enable the development of high-efficiency, low risk SoCs using other Cortex-A9 processor configurations, ARM also provides the silicon-proven SoC-level ARM Physical IP platform used to build these hard macros, and a range of AMBA-compliant system development components and tools.
In addition, the ARM Active Assist consulting service, developed in conjunction with the hard macros, enables ARM Partners to efficiently integrate the hardened macro into their SoC design to realize maximum system performance with lowest risk and fastest time-to-market.
Availability
The Cortex-A9 hard macros and the corresponding optimized physical IP used to develop the speed-optimized and power-optimized
implementations are available for license today with delivery in the fourth quarter of 2009. ARM’s 40G physical IP platform is also available today at designstart.arm.com.
Broadcom Licenses Latest ARM Cortex A9 Multiprocessor Technology
Broadcom adopts Cortex-A9 MPCore multicore processor for use in certain mobile and wireless applications
CAMBRIDGE, UK and IRVINE, CA, September 28, 2009 – ARM [(LSE:ARM); (Nasdaq:ARMH)] , and Broadcom Corporation (Nasdaq: BRCM), a global leader in semiconductors for wired and wireless communications, today announced that they have signed a major licensing agreement for the ARM® Cortex™ -A9 MPCore™ multicore processor. Broadcom intends to target the technology towards next-generation mobile, wireless and other consumer electronics applications.
That's really been my only issue as well -- and it's a big one. The signal seems so inconsistent. One day I can have five bars of 3G; the next day I have two bars of EDGE in the same location. My wife and I visit relatives in Sandusky, Ohio. It's not a metropolis, but it is a busy tourist spot. In many sections of that location I get no service whatsoever.
So if the iPhone came to Verizon, I would seriously consider it. If the iPhone doesn't come to Verizon and AT&T doesn't improve their coverage, then I will seriously consider a different smartphone. No matter how much I like my iPhone, if it doesn't connect reliably then it isn't worth much.
Next iPhone will be the ARM Cortex-A9 MPCore multicore processor as a custom fabrication by Apple.
http://www.arm.com/news/25922.html
<snip>
oh ok, thanks for the clarification.The pastry names are just the code names for the versions. Nowhere on my phone does it say I am running Version 1.6: Donut. The logo for Android is the lil green robot dude. I think the pastry names are unique.
Yes I did, but guess what, the other day I listened to music streaming from last.fm whilst using google maps the other day in my car. Could you do that with the iPhone?
Multitiasking should be across the board.
genovelle said:Nope. I compared it with "every single current Android device" to quote you.
I guess since the Iphone is OS-X we should compare android devices to macbook pros
The iPhone is behind the times in so many areas it's just silly. The iPhone's camera was crap and obsolete the day it came out. Heck, my FOUR year old Nokia N73 has a 5 MP camera with Carl Zeiss optics, zoom, and a flash. What kind of camera does the iphone have again? Oh, right, a piece of ****.