I have been on this forum since 2011 when I purchased my first MBP. This forum has turned so much more negative toward Apple. It was about helping people, troubleshooting. I can't believe the turn around in the forum. Mike Flynn you are a Moderator, do you even own an apple product now. All I hear you do is promote MS now. What has this turned into?????
GO SOMEWHERE ELSE AND TALK WINDOWS!!!!!! This place is for MAC HELP!!!!!!
MR is a dumpster fire... but it's just following the evolution of the internet... we're seeing the same things on every website and forum... from the click-bait headlines to the
least informed and knowledgeable people being the loudest voices in every online discussion. The devolving discourse is a reflection of that.
A couple things to keep in mind...
MacRumors has never been a "support" site - it's a prototypical "tech" site... it's mostly people who like to tinker with tech. The tech industry is moving away from people who like to tinker with tech to "consumer" devices where people using the devices have no interest in "tech" in itself... the devices are simply tools to do whatever it is they want to do. This transition has been going on since the first PC's of the 1970's... so whether someone started tinkering in the '70s or not until 2010, they've been subjected to this trend of computers becoming more and more closed devices.
And just like those guys who like to tinker with cars, they don't like the new stuff because they can't tinker with it. To someone who's always liked being able to upgrade their RAM or their storage drive or whatever it is, it's a net loss to them. Whereas, the other 93% of the computer buying public couldn't care less... but they obviously aren't going to hang out on a tech forum to rant about why they couldn't care less.
Add to that Apple products are "premium" devices at "premium" prices. The regulars on tech forums are mostly young people with no money or very limited budgets, and... older tech enthusiasts with no money or very limited budgets. When you're on a very limited budget, one way to save money is to tinker... if you can do it yourself, you can save money. If the device is closed and limited upgradeability, you can't save money, and so you don't like the product. Then there are a lot of people who simply resent the cost of the product because they can't afford it but feel entitled to it.
Then there's simply the "internet" - as wonderfully "open to all" as the internet is, without proper "enforcement", public forums slowly devolve to the lowest common denominator... just think youtube "comment" sections. That's where forums like MR are headed. There are regular posters here with literally
hundreds of posts saying essentially the same thing... fill-in-the-blank Apple product sucks or some variation on that.
Without casting aspersions (i.e. we can't
really talk about this)... what kind of a person spends so much time on a forum posting that? More importantly, what kind of a person continues to participate in a space where that's the "norm"? IOW, the forums are self-selective. It's a certain kind of person that will post the same negative thing hundreds of times. And it's a certain kind of person that wants to continue to read the same negative thing hundreds of times. And no surprise, there's far more of the former than latter, so we've seen a brain-drain as the latter moves on or rarely participates. You're left with mostly people who like to rant and argue.
You'll see bizzaro-world accusations of the forums being overrun with Apple "apologists", but where are they all? The seem to be out-numbered about 10-1 by Apple "haters". I've been accused of being an apologist on more than one occasion. Even though I could write a hundred page book about all the shortcomings of Apple and Apple products. Because if you're not here to bash Apple on a daily basis, then you're an Apple apologist.
We obviously can't talk about Maflynn's moderating in "frank" terms, but I hope it's safe to remark that I think moderators of a very large and influential public forum like MR have to understand that when you become a "moderator", you gain certain privileges, and you give up certain privileges. It's like being a moderator at a political debate... with the title "moderator", you have undue influence, and you don't want the perception that you're using that influence to favor certain arguments or posters. This is a wide-spread "issue" with MR forums in general, and where much of the accusations of moderator unfairness stem from. And across the board, the mods are obtuse - I suspect that's partly why they are selected, but it also comes from being a moderator for too long. Just like what happened here, it's pretty much par for the course that if you make a comment about the negativity of the forums, they will point out that you could have just skipped
this "negative" thread, as though you were commenting only on this thread specifically and ignoring that you were referring to the forums in general. I equate it to talking to a brick wall - every conversation with MR mods goes exactly the same way.