Yet see in my highly mobile industry that I work for, many of our people use 2n1 surface tablets because they need the functionality that a laptop has with the portability that an iPad has. Just because you don’t see them in your line of work or in malls or Starbucks doesn’t mean there isn’t a demand for them. In fact, if Apple were to make their iPad Pro lineup have an iOS interface that supported mouse/trackpad use, I’d seriously consider using it to replace my personal MacBooks pro. I need mouse functionality but I don’t get that with a tablet. Now a 2n1 like a surface device I could.They're questionable, and they always have been. It's what made the iPad come to market and dominate: failed Windows tablets and convertibles. Turns out the thin, simplistic, slate device that is the iPad is what put tablets on the map, not 2-in-1 devices. And why iPad sells in the millions every quarter.
The Surface Book and Yoga are interesting, but they are not the best laptops and not the best tablets because they compromise given their 2-in-1 nature. This extends to the software as well. They will never dominate dedicated laptops and tablets like the iPad, MacBook Pro, Dell XPS, etc.
[doublepost=1554092915][/doublepost]
No, they don't. You post 4 articles and can't generalize from that, and that these articles actually don't fully support your position. Articles that, overall, are all over the place.
Reality:
"...sales of detachables in general were relatively weak in Q3 [2018]: total tablet sales in the region fell 2.9 per cent to 7.5 million. The slate form factor accounted for the majority of these shipments into the channel. Detachables, which accounted for one-fifth of the sector, declined 14.5 per cent year-on-year."
The 2-in-1s are better than they were 15 years ago, no surprise there. But the same principles apply.
The numbers speak to the reality I experience as well. In the corporate world where I exist, including working with contractors from all over Canada and the US, along with in-house staff (I'm in IT), nobody has a 2-in-1.
When I move about the world, Starbucks, malls, restaurants, etc., almost nobody has 2-in-1s. People use smartphones. And then we have laptops as a portable desktop. A tablet has a hard enough time competing with big smartphones, let along a design compromised iteration of it stuck in a 2-in-1 worm hole.
Now I would not buy a surface because I don’t care for it’s design (no offense to fans of it), and quite honestly I love my MacBook Pro, which does everything I need it to. But saying there isn’t a demand for 2n1 or that they are “questionable” is peculiar to me, because they have the very things that I want in an iPad but can’t get.