Duuude, I was thinking the exact same thing.
1. Steve is eccentric
2. Apple is in a position financially, to be able to abandon this iPhone just to teach the public a lesson.
Nah, I'm not a fanboy, I just think Steve Jobs is eccentric enough to do something like this. Haven't you heard the Apple horror stories during the development of the original iPhone?
Too bad for Apple, their fun is ruined for a June unveiling. I don't think it's going to hurt sales or excitement much though.
It looks beautiful. Much closer to the original iPhone which I liked a lot.
I'm not sure I'd want to be the Gizmodo guy. Will Apple ever let him attend one of their events again?
With the amount of money they've undoubtedly spent on the new iPhone, with the annual refresh cycle that their customers are used to, and with WWDC just a couple of months away, there's no way Jobs would ditch this even if it's legitimate. No one would be stupid enough to piss away all of that work and money just because of a leak.
Thanks for that link. Note that he doesn't say it was taken from Apple HQ... just that Apple considers it stolen, not lost. Which is understandable. They want it back pronto.
How much longer could battery life be with a 16% larger battery?
OK so gizmodo had it for 2 weeks how did engadget get it?
Wake up guys! Apple is playing catch up to HTC recently and the current iPhone 3GS is the cell phone equivalent of an 88 BMW. Still nice, with a classic design, but.... old.
What they're trying to do with this leak is to keep all of you who are interested in buying a cell phone NOW, not in 3 months, still interested in an Apple iPhone. This is all planned.
just a guess here but 16% longer?!
Gizmodo and Engadget share a lot of DNA. The bigger question is why did Gizmodo sit on the info for a week?
Either way, Gizmodo is now in possession of stolen property. So good luck with that. Brian Lam better drive it over to Cupertino stat before the Apple lawyers come knocking.
Has anyone emailed Steve yet about his feelings on the leak? Lol!
Gizmodo and Engadget share a lot of DNA. The bigger question is why did Gizmodo sit on the info for a week?
Either way, Gizmodo is now in possession of stolen property. So good luck with that. Brian Lam better drive it over to Cupertino stat before the Apple lawyers come knocking.
.....I have to say this update seems like a small one. I feel almost no pull to upgrade from my 3GS.
Thinking about it you're right. It sits flush on top.
It seems that Gruber is right. Gizmodo is Engadget's sister site (along with TUAW) and Gizmodo had the more extensive post while Engadget got first dibs on the story.
Thanks for that link. Note that he doesn't say it was taken from Apple HQ... just that Apple considers it stolen, not lost. Which is understandable. They want it back pronto.