Now now .....that MacBook Air was about innovation that only apple could achieve, it even fit into a foldernever aimed at pros...hence it lost ports to achieve form over function . The innovation at the time was limited by components ....hence the issues it had.
The MacBook Air moment was like the 2007 iPhone. Both of which were overpriced btw and received a price dropped once apple realised they were on a winner .
You cannot compare the MacBook Air launch to the 2016 model....nothing in the 2016 is being held back by 2017 tech except for ....battery
Or a lot more non-TB were sold...so an increased chance of a return/refurb cropping up.Looks like all the touchbar people are happier than the non touch as per the returns
No touch bar is a benefit.
Just about everything you've said above also applies to the 2016 MBP. The 2016 MBP is very innovative if one's outlook isn't predisposed to ragging on Apple, which btw, occurred when the original MBA was released. Ditto for the iPhone.
Try and understand what a "Pro" really is. Pro computer users are simply people who work in business environments that use computers. They're not limited to what many here personally romanticize as Walter Murch film editors. I know just as many "pros" using MacBook Air laptops as those using MacBook Pros. The word "Pro" is attached to all sorts of consumer-level products, Sony's PlayStation Pro is a great example.
Stated differently, "Pro" is just a label that differentiates a bump in performance/features relative to lower cost/performance models. Most people, outside of some here on MR who use that as whine-worthy fodder, understand that.
"nothing in the 2016 is being held back by 2017 tech except for ....battery"
The same limitations that pushed the envelope with the original MBA apply to the 2016 MBP. The CPU is a great example. For the last few years Intel's updates have been few, delayed, and very incremental performance increases. Thus "innovation" is limited by components as well with the MBP, even though its extremely high-performance and flexible I/O in compact form is clearly innovative for a laptop.
The 2008 MBA with limited technology, coupled with removing almost all ports, the optical drive, SD slot, ethernet, etc resulted in a laptop heavily loaded with profit priced at $1799.
Like the original MBA and previous MBPs, the price for the current MBP will drop while its performance increases as technology evolves.
The problem is Apple has never set a precedent for dropping prices as the rest of the industry evolves. It's "this is our product, buy it or don't".the price for the current MBP will drop while its performance increases as technology evolves.
You missed my point, the first generation macbook air was not fit for purpose, weather you were a pro or not, its GPU could not even run youtube....it was not till the second generation that it was useable.
The 2016 is nothing like the original macbook air, its just a slow evolution of the current Macbook pro with some elements from the macbook....no WOW about it when it was launched.
Again the 2008 MBA was not useable even for the consumer ......in 2008 CPUs were still underperforming unlike today. Today a 2012 macbook retina CPU is competitive, its the advances in Storage that have leaped . The issue with the 2008 MBA was also storage.....its was SSD that made these laptops a new breed.
In my opinion there is nothing innovative about the 2016 macbook pro....its just an evolution step..... its not even got major tech advantage, TB3 is useless over TB2 for the average consumer.
What is the selling point of the 2016 Macbook pro, the original air was size/weight, the 2012 was again size and weight...... the 2016....a slight weight loss.... compared to the major weight cuts of the previous 2.....meh in my opinion. TB3 over TB2....meh.....pass.
The problem is Apple has never set a precedent for dropping prices as the rest of the industry evolves. It's "this is our product, buy it or don't".
Genuine question, is this earlier than usual?
Haven't been around the Mac scene long enough to know. Just curious.
13 inch, no touch bar, dual core, no dedicated graphics, refurbished.
2k$.
Seems a bit steep.
How many casual users need a Pro laptop? I'd say not many.
And the benefits for a refurbished model, is that Apple has a very stringent process where they go through and test the MacBook on all levels to ensure it sufficiently running. And a lot of retrospect, it's far less likely have any more issues than what a new model would have out of the box From the factory.
Buy a 2015 MacBookTrue. But how do they expect developers to develop next gen games and apps on these crap MBPs or iMacs with Intel Iris graphics?
iPad and iPhone apps are not going to develop themselves on mobiles or tablets.
I hear superior specs are also only available on the TB models.If all you want to do is charge it. Can't even stick SD card in.. heck. Can't even charge your iPhone without dongle.
[doublepost=1489043975][/doublepost]
TB is great because you'll get 2 more ports... on the other side. You're paying for more ports too.