Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It doesn't lessen the profundity of that quote, my friend. And some would argue that she was merely getting back what she was forced to pay into her whole life.

She said it was a sign of weakness to ask for or accept assistance of that nature. Which she turned around and did, furtively, under a different name. Hypocrisy, pure and simple.
 
Lets face it we all know that Asian companies in Asia duplicate everything from electronics to the Rolex to Viagara. So I would have to side with Apple on this one. At the same time I do think that both competition and innovation are extremely important, it would be nice if companies spent more time innovating rather than copying other people's products because they are simply superior and they sell like cheese burgers. One such company that could really use some innovation is Microsoft, they have no vision mostly because they outsource most of their work to India. On the other hand Apple doesn't, they use US talent to produce awesome products that companies like Microsoft in turn try to replicate in India, it not happening Microsoft, what the hell is that Windows 8 ****? I'm sure it's going to be another nightmare product to support due to all its outsourced bugs.


-Mike

Uhm two things:

As far as I'm aware, Microsoft only outsourced its customer support to India. The software engineers are still American.

Second, India produces quality engineers and in pretty large numbers too. I bet many of the software engineers in the big tech companies are of Indian descent.

Windows 8 is going to fail because it's too large of a paradigm shift. But the actual foundations of the OS are sound
 
Motorola used to be good back in the Startec days. Now they are crap and barely hanging, I'm really surprised they haven't gone bankrupt and shutdown.

-Mike
Give Apple time to get around to slapping Google down & they may well be cast adrift.
 
It amazes me how mis-informed people like you are. Let me paint you a simple picture.......

ITS ILLEGAL TO COPY PATENTED PRODUCTS OR DESIGNS !!!!!!!!!!!

Get it now?

Have you ever USED an android phone, or even a Samsung phone? I think not, judging from your position on this topic.
 
It is unfortunate that patent law can be manipulated to give one company a monopoly over rectangles with rounded corners

Samsung tries nonsensical Fandroid talking point on jury. Jury isn't dumb enough to go for it.

So Samsung tries nonsensical talking point on news-reading public.

No wonder they can't create their own designs. They have no originality.
 
I'm shocked that there are people out there who actually think that stealing something wholesale, as Samsung had clearly done, is somehow good at any level.

At the end of the day, it really is about values. Even if you believe Apple's patents should never have been granted, the fact remains, all but the most zealous fanboys can see that Samsung ripped off Apple and they profited handsomely from Apple's hard work.

And most good people around the world would agree that stealing is wrong. In my opinion, justice was served today and humanity is better for it.
 
Protecting Innovation

Samsung and Google copied Apple. And now one of them has been called out. Here is to the even worse treachery of Google whose CEO "moled" his way onto Apple's board while all the time taking notes on how to rip off Apple.

i hope both Samsung and Google end up in the dustbin of ex-tech.
 
actually it woud not force innovation. Think about what you just said. If the patent expires after a year or two, then all the copying would begin. Keep patents in place for 5+ years and companies would be forced to innovate beacuse the would not be allowed to copy........hense the current patent laws that are in place.

2 years, 5 years your splitting hairs. You understood my point and ever so slightly revised it.
 
Glad to see Samsung will really be innovating now. I'd like to see an entire package of innovation, not certain leaps made possible by the copying of other components they saw as unimportant.

Exactly. Has Apple complained about Windows Phone 7? No. No copying, either. The Windows Phone environment is one that should only grow. For all the people who keep on saying, "choice," sure, we should all have a choice, but not between iOS and iOS javascript edition from Google.

This is not some kind of "who cares" arrangement. Apple worked like hell for four years to bring the iPhone to market. Time for the Android boys to work out something original too. If people competed fairly with Apple, we'd actually have different environments that people could choose, and not only Apple would be changing the world.
 
Actually in lab tests I've personally performed and others that I've seen, Apple does match and some cases succeeded motorola's RF.

Sorry, I call bs.

----------

why would I need to pick up an SIII when my iPhone works? you don't get it ...I don't need a new phone yet! When I do I'll look at what's on the market & I'll pick what suits my needs\lifestyle, and I will absolutely NOT be asking your opinion as your viewpoint seems somewhat biased.

Had a bad experience with iPhone? it certainly seems so.

It's good to see that you're not biased toward Apple. It would be refreshing to see some of that here.

----------

Motorola used to be good back in the Startec days. Now they are crap and barely hanging, I'm really surprised they haven't gone bankrupt and shutdown.

-Mike

Outside of AppleLand, most would disagree with that.

----------

At the end of the day, it really is about values.

And Apple has such great values.
 
Samsung said:
give one company a monopoly over rectangles with rounded corners
Steve asked Woz to make "roundrecs." It has been a central meme of Apple since. When Apple did trade dress and patent apps they always made claims on roundrecs. It is a theme for Apple. Always has been.

It's not a "monopoly". It is a protected trade dress. First mover advantage!

Rocketman
 
That's the great thing about opinions - everyone gets to have one.

And, seriously? "Crapents"?

If you meant "flat", then, you may not think so, but apparently the people selected for the jury do.

Since said jury ruled overwhelmingly in favor of Apple, you can either deduce that they were all biased towards Apple (kind of unlikely), or that they thought the patents were valid (more in the realm of possibility).

Just reading the accounts of the jury trial, the Apple legal team was as clear and as simple as a good Apple keynote in the Jobs days. They told a clear story, and it translated to the jury. The Samsung crew were all over the map, and they didn't do as good a job. They didn't have as good a story to tell, either: "Well, everybody copies!" is a stupid defense.
 
Apple didn't invent any of the products I posted. They copied the idea from someone else. But that's ok, right?

Copying ideas and licensing technology is very different from stealing patents.

Really, you need a reality check.
 
She said it was a sign of weakness to ask for or accept assistance of that nature. Which she turned around and did, furtively, under a different name. Hypocrisy, pure and simple.

Doing it under a different name does smell funky.
 
Can you tell me where the mouse peripheral came from? Because unlike what Apple would like you to believe, they did not in fact invent it.

How about a more current "feature," the notification slider in iOS 5?

How about the search function in Safari? Or the QWERTY keyboard you use?

The calendar that iOS utilizes... The digital clock that iOS uses at the top of the screen...

All this could be considered "copied"

That's why this ruling is so ridiculous.

However they did not steal patented designs for any of this, which is the issue here.
 
Not when the patents that apple is using are crapents. WHich means they weak patents and overly broad.
Sorry but you should not be able to patent a flash slab retangle.

Read the actual patent and then attack it, and you will have much more credibility with your rant...
 
I'm not criticizing you. I commented on your post. Other than in Appleland, the S3 is considered the more advanced phone. That may change in a couple of weeks with the new iPhone.

Samsung copied Apple in order to get into the market rapidly and establish themselves. The court found them guilty of this and ordered them to pay Apple $1B as a result.

What they have done in the way of innovation since those days is not the issue.
 
And how do you see Samsung's phones as a lavish copy of the iPhone? Or did Apple really invent the rectangle?

----------



Nothing. They copied. Just like Apple.

Lol. What a joke. You have absolutely no argument. The proofs in the pudding (billion dollars). You can't argue against that, that's the fact. You've been exposed, beaten and battered and now everyone knows your a troll. You have lost all credibility and can no longer be taken seriously in anything you post. Keep covering your ears and yelling "lalala I can't hear you" whenever someone counters your your now debunked opinions. Maybe you can come back if Samsung wins in appeals court.

I look forward to your resignation.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.