The iPhone can't match a Motorola for RF.
Motorola used to be good back in the Startec days. Now they are crap and barely hanging, I'm really surprised they haven't gone bankrupt and shutdown.
-Mike
The iPhone can't match a Motorola for RF.
It doesn't lessen the profundity of that quote, my friend. And some would argue that she was merely getting back what she was forced to pay into her whole life.
Lets face it we all know that Asian companies in Asia duplicate everything from electronics to the Rolex to Viagara. So I would have to side with Apple on this one. At the same time I do think that both competition and innovation are extremely important, it would be nice if companies spent more time innovating rather than copying other people's products because they are simply superior and they sell like cheese burgers. One such company that could really use some innovation is Microsoft, they have no vision mostly because they outsource most of their work to India. On the other hand Apple doesn't, they use US talent to produce awesome products that companies like Microsoft in turn try to replicate in India, it not happening Microsoft, what the hell is that Windows 8 ****? I'm sure it's going to be another nightmare product to support due to all its outsourced bugs.
-Mike
Give Apple time to get around to slapping Google down & they may well be cast adrift.Motorola used to be good back in the Startec days. Now they are crap and barely hanging, I'm really surprised they haven't gone bankrupt and shutdown.
-Mike
It amazes me how mis-informed people like you are. Let me paint you a simple picture.......
ITS ILLEGAL TO COPY PATENTED PRODUCTS OR DESIGNS !!!!!!!!!!!
Get it now?
It is unfortunate that patent law can be manipulated to give one company a monopoly over rectangles with rounded corners
so you are going to go for a lesser phone just to spite a company that doesn't affect your life?
actually it woud not force innovation. Think about what you just said. If the patent expires after a year or two, then all the copying would begin. Keep patents in place for 5+ years and companies would be forced to innovate beacuse the would not be allowed to copy........hense the current patent laws that are in place.
paid for or stolen? ...think carefully before you answer.![]()
Glad to see Samsung will really be innovating now. I'd like to see an entire package of innovation, not certain leaps made possible by the copying of other components they saw as unimportant.
Did Apple get their marketing team to write that statement?
Actually in lab tests I've personally performed and others that I've seen, Apple does match and some cases succeeded motorola's RF.
why would I need to pick up an SIII when my iPhone works? you don't get it ...I don't need a new phone yet! When I do I'll look at what's on the market & I'll pick what suits my needs\lifestyle, and I will absolutely NOT be asking your opinion as your viewpoint seems somewhat biased.
Had a bad experience with iPhone? it certainly seems so.
Motorola used to be good back in the Startec days. Now they are crap and barely hanging, I'm really surprised they haven't gone bankrupt and shutdown.
-Mike
At the end of the day, it really is about values.
Steve asked Woz to make "roundrecs." It has been a central meme of Apple since. When Apple did trade dress and patent apps they always made claims on roundrecs. It is a theme for Apple. Always has been.Samsung said:give one company a monopoly over rectangles with rounded corners
That's the great thing about opinions - everyone gets to have one.
And, seriously? "Crapents"?
If you meant "flat", then, you may not think so, but apparently the people selected for the jury do.
Since said jury ruled overwhelmingly in favor of Apple, you can either deduce that they were all biased towards Apple (kind of unlikely), or that they thought the patents were valid (more in the realm of possibility).
Give Apple time to get around to slapping Google down & they may well be cast adrift.
Apple didn't invent any of the products I posted. They copied the idea from someone else. But that's ok, right?
but you have to admit, it smacks of hypocrisy.
I'm shocked that there are people out there who actually think that stealing something wholesale, as Samsung had clearly done, is somehow good at any level.
She said it was a sign of weakness to ask for or accept assistance of that nature. Which she turned around and did, furtively, under a different name. Hypocrisy, pure and simple.
Can you tell me where the mouse peripheral came from? Because unlike what Apple would like you to believe, they did not in fact invent it.
How about a more current "feature," the notification slider in iOS 5?
How about the search function in Safari? Or the QWERTY keyboard you use?
The calendar that iOS utilizes... The digital clock that iOS uses at the top of the screen...
All this could be considered "copied"
That's why this ruling is so ridiculous.
Not when the patents that apple is using are crapents. WHich means they weak patents and overly broad.
Sorry but you should not be able to patent a flash slab retangle.
I'm not criticizing you. I commented on your post. Other than in Appleland, the S3 is considered the more advanced phone. That may change in a couple of weeks with the new iPhone.
And how do you see Samsung's phones as a lavish copy of the iPhone? Or did Apple really invent the rectangle?
----------
Nothing. They copied. Just like Apple.