Live performers for one.Not only that, but who would seriously want to do Pro work for video and sound editing on an iPad?
Not every Pro video or audio editing task involves sitting at a desk.
Live performers for one.Not only that, but who would seriously want to do Pro work for video and sound editing on an iPad?
Fair enough. I am not saying that the iPad versions will not be helpful in doing secondary tasks, but the whole hype is just too much. Let's be real and wait for a real review from someone that makes money from Pro Apps..Live performers for one.
Not every Pro video or audio editing task involves sitting at a desk.
That would be really bad. Who would want to keep separate projects? That makes me think that the iPad versions will be really limited, which I understand of course..This thread is so long, but one interesting thing in the article is that it makes it seems that working on projects is one-way like how iMovie is on the iPad/iPhone because it says "users can export Final Cut Pro projects made on iPad to the Mac." Davinci Resolve is a two-way street. Projects can be opened on Mac, PC, or iPad at any given time. Having only a one-way path would turn me off from FCP on iPad.
Try again. The 11" iPad Pro weights 471 grams. or 1.03 lbs. The Magic Keyboard weights 601 grams, or 1.32 lbs. Together they weigh 1072 grams, or 2.36 lbs. The 13" MBA weighs 2.7 lbs. The 13" MBP weighs 3.0 lbs.The biggest compromise is mostly weight, at least for iPads. To get a keyboard with a robust hinge you pretty much need something sturdy like the Magic Keyboard. But it also more than doubles the weight.
I frequently use it on the road (or toilet) to remote into client machines, admin servers, manage websites and a whole lot more.The iPad is a great device for non technical people. For techies and IT people the iPad is a toy. Sorry.
We wanted pro software, and we'll expect it get continuously updated, but we somehow expected all future development to be done for free. Do I understand you correctly?Subscription model? Cringe.
I should have specified that I meant the 12.9” iPad Pro, which is heavier than MBA with the combo at around 1300g. If you go with the 11” you are also sacrificing a significant amount of screen real estate, thus a different compromise. The discontinued intel 11” MBA by the way, was only about 1080g. If Apple made one today they could probably make it much lighter, seeing that the 12” MB was 920g.Try again. The 11" iPad Pro weights 471 grams. or 1.03 lbs. The Magic Keyboard weights 601 grams, or 1.32 lbs. Together they weigh 1072 grams, or 2.36 lbs. The 13" MBA weighs 2.7 lbs. The 13" MBP weighs 3.0 lbs.
Why should I change the way I am using computers? I don't see any advantages in doing that. None at all. The iPad makes all tasks I need to complete on a computer much more complicated and cumbersome. Why would I want that? Please enlighten me.I frequently use it on the road (or toilet) to remote into client machines, admin servers, manage websites and a whole lot more.
When I'm at home it frees up my desktop machine from being cluttered up with email / videos calls etc. so I can focus on tasks best suited to my desktop environment.
If you think the iPad is a toy, you're either using it wrong and not seeing its potential or simply resist behavioral change.
Exactly my thoughts.OMG FINALLY!!! 🤩🤩🤩
Subscriptions, though… 😩😩😩
I’m not the biggest fan of subscriptions either, but this doesn’t necessarily have to be true. They could do it like Microsoft does it with the Office suite, and when your subscription runs out they could allow the programs to continue functioning but in read only mode - therefore giving you access to everything you’ve already made even when not paying.Disappointed to see Apple move away from purchase/ownership to the "subscription model" for its software. I have bought lots of apps outright over the years but I really, really dislike subscriptions. Not only is it a recurring payment *forever* but cancelling the subscription often means you can no longer use the files you already created with the application. It's almost like extortion -- paying protection money to ensure the files you created last year will still work next year. This is a worrisome precedent.
We wanted pro software, and we'll expect it get continuously updated, but we somehow expected all future development to be done for free. Do I understand you correctly?
Not necessarily 100%.. Final Cut Pro & Logic Pro remain on top as two of the most illegally downloaded apps on macOS, as they have been for many years now.Unlikely. 100% of Desktop users are fine with the full price. The sub model on iPad is a nice gesture to say you don't have to pay another $300.
Many people are running professional setups on M1 SOC Macs.
Why should the iPad have RAM and Processor issues when the Mac has none?
Subscription models doesn’t really do much for curbing piracy if people want it enough. The Adobe CC apps has been continuously cracked and shared ever since they became subscriptions.Not necessarily 100%.. Final Cut Pro & Logic Pro remain on top as two of the most illegally downloaded apps on macOS, as they have been for many years now.
I imagine another reason of the subscription model being popular these days is its inherent ability to prevent piracy of the applications.
It’s the bane of SOME consumers, for sure. When one looks at the amount of money companies are making from subscriptions, though, it’s not enough consumers to prevent those companies from being able to support their continuing development activities.The subscription model is the bane of consumers. One more reason to stick to a 'full' computer like the MacBook.
M1 iPads have the same exact memory options as M1 Macbooks, and the thermal performance is very close too.It's a tablet for a start with less memory and even thinner heat sink.
Do the math. How much is an Apple One subscription per month and how much are these apps per month. There’s no way FCP or LP will be included.Is the subscription included in Apple One? If not, they can f off.