My stupid shuffle is dead so I'll save for a nano. At least for another $100 over the shuffle I can get a color screen, wheel and have more than 70 songs.
thejakill said:something i like about the shuffle is that the button sticks up from the player. you can FEEL it when you need to pause or adjust the music somehow. you don't have to look at it. it's good for working out. you can hide it under your clothes and still control it by feel.
still, the nano is way cooler.
LaMerVipere said:My only gripe with the iPod nano is that they put the audio jack on the bottom of the device. What's that about?
Whyren said:Yes, but many users (esp. Mac) only have USB 1 ports. To fill a 512MB shuffle, it doesn't take that much time, even through USB 1. To fill a 2GB nano, that's a little more time-consuming.
alexeismertin said:This is a desparate attempt by apple to get revenue, they have no new ideas on the computer line until intel & now they are trying to sell you same **** for more money - who cares if its flash - like that will ever be something you ask the sales assistant before buying an MP3 player - its all about capacity & money.
the nano is nice enough, but thats it. nice. the pricing is ALL wrong! £30 separates the 4Gb & the 20Gb.
alexeismertin said:the nano is nice enough, but thats it. nice. the pricing is ALL wrong! £30 separates the 4Gb & the 20Gb.
dan-o-mac said:I'm assuming you weren't around when the mini was introduced, That was the biggest arguement for why the mini would flop.
USB 2.0 = not supported by any of my family's Macs.elo said:USB 2.0 = very fast. Relax.
DJY said:resist... resist...
AidenShaw said: