Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Gotta be a pretty big chump to drop $400 on a new iPhone SE when you can buy a 1-2 year old XS for the same money.
 
I think Apple may have let themselves down in terms of this devices size. One major attraction of the original SE was the fact it was compact in the sizing of the iPhone 5. I think Apple may have assumed cost was the 'only' reason people liked the SE.

I have to admit I knew a lot of people who bought the first edition and were in the position to easily afford whatever iPhone they wanted. It was the size that appealed and Apple appear to have missed a trick there.

That being said is a nice phone for what it offers and I'm sure it'll be a slow burner in regards of popularity. It does annoy me though that Apple never quite deliver fully and this seems to have been their model for a few years now.

We also appreciate the sleep button not being directly across from the landscape orientation camera shutter button. #DumbDesignChoice Award
 
650 comments...what do u mean there’s no excitement?

Do you think all of these comments are positive or show interest/excitement for this phone? At least one guy has probably made 20 negative posts in this thread and then there's all of the inane one liners like 'no night mode - no buy'.

Don't get me wrong, I love the idea of this phone for those that want smaller, Touch ID, etc. but it has certainly brought out a lot of negativity as well because people just can't seem to ignore something they aren't interested in and instead need to let everyone know just how unexcited they are. (as if anyone cares)
 
Last edited:
I suspect most of the negativity towards this phone is because it represents Apple's complete failure to make a decent replacement for those who love the original SE.

Of course, it will be ignored but that won't stop people complaining about it.

And yes, there is nothing, I mean absolutely nothing exciting about this phone.
 
Here's hoping for the iPhone 12 5.4 inch!

New-iPhone-5.4-inch-Edited.jpg

I have concerns about the upcoming 5.4" iPhone 12.

The drawings predict that this new model will have nearly the same physical dimensions as the old 4" SE... but with an edge-to-edge 5.4" screen. That sounds great.

However... physically speaking... the body is very small. There will have to be substantial miniaturization to get all the goodies inside it.

I don't think people realize how much smaller an old SE-sized body is compared to the current iPhone 11. It's quite different. Remarkably different. That's less room for battery, less room for cameras and other sensors, etc.

Below is what an iPhone SE looks like compared to the iPhone 11.

Notice the difference in physical body size.

Are we sure Apple can put iPhone 12 components inside a body roughly the same size as the old SE ?

mCnYCbS.jpg
 
Last edited:
That is why I am eagerly waiting for 5.4" iPhone this year. Almost as same size as the old SE.

This will be the phone for me this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: freezelighter
Didn't most people buy the SE because they like having a smaller iPhone? I don't see this one catching on. My wife has no desire to upgrade her SE after asking me how big this one was.
I've been interacting with this thread since yesterday (I've been hanging around due to my excitement for getting this phone: likely the only new phone I'll be buying in an eight-year span!), and I have seen a lot of complaint about the size, and a lot of statement that this ISN'T an iPhone SE because it's not a 4" phone. Well, it is an iPhone SE because it's called an iPhone SE, and this reveals what Apple's product strategy is for the SE brand.

But this quote above is really what it gets at, and is phrased correctly. I know this is nitpicky, but I'm a picker of nits (I'm great fun at parties!)...when macduke suggests that "most people buy the SE because they like having a smaller iPhone" that's spot on: it doesn't matter what Apple's intent is (about the SE or about any product)...each of us has his/her own priorities as far as aspects of a phone. Size is one of them, and the original SE was definitely a unique aspect in Apple's lineup.

So to suggest that many people bought the original SE because they wanted a 4" iPhone is a perfectly defensible thing, whereas claiming that this new SE isn't an SE at all because it's not the same size is not.

To beat a dying horse:
the original SE was essentially a 5S shell, with mostly the same guts as the 6S. So same-as-new guts, 2-and-a-bit year old body.

the new SE is essentially an 8 shell, with mostly mostly the same guts as the 10/10 Pro. So same-as-new guts, 2-and-a bit year old body.

I think I see a trend here.
This is exactly it. Until yesterday, the 2016 SE was a one-off. It could have philosophically been a size thing, from the outside that was a reasonable thing to think. Until today. Now we have two models of SE on the timeline, and we can look at them both and clearly see the similarities and have a better understanding of what the SE line really is. Doesn't mean anyone has to like it: I bought the original SE for its size, too! But clearly this is what it really is.

I know John Gruber isn't everyone's cup of tea, but here's his take from this morning:
Daring Fireball on the new SE


We also appreciate the sleep button not being directly across from the landscape orientation camera shutter button.
Not appropos of the rest of this post, I agree with this. There's the physical size of the thing, which crosses a threshold where handling it requires different mechanics (in a way that the 4" iPhone didn't require different mechanics to the 3.5" iPhone). So there's that trade-off to the larger screen size. But I believe the sleep button placement is going to drive me nuts until I get new muscle memory: the sleep button SHOULD be on the top in a perfect world: it would lead to fewer accidental sleeps I would imagine. But the phone's height surpasses a point where it would be easy to just reach with your index finger to the top and hit the button, so clearly it had to be moved. But I will miss that placement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MartyvH
The horse is glue by now.
lol, it's just the second wave. The morning commenters beat it, and by the time the evening commenters got here they weren't going to read 20 pages of posts, so they just beat it all over again! :)
[automerge]1587045205[/automerge]
The time has come to switch my Star Trek communicator flip phone for a smart phone. This will be my first.
If you're not pulling our legs, this is really impressive! I can't say why, I'm just impressed.
[automerge]1587045230[/automerge]
Or in England, Pies.
The best pies in London!
 
  • Like
Reactions: MartyvH
The time has come to switch my Star Trek communicator flip phone for a smart phone. This will be my first.
Good luck (seriously).


Separately - my iPhone 7 has a ****ed lightning port and a not-fantastic battery. I'd planned to drop it off for repair around the time the apocalypse happened, while also considering if I should just upgrade to an 11 (or 11 Pro). This is intriguing though - it's not so much that the 11 (pro or not) is too expensive (it'll be a company expense, and I happen to have a very good relationship with the director, I'm sitting in his chair wearing his pants right now), but I don't know that I'd get ~3x the value out of it. The better camera would be nice, but I don't play games (on any device), and I suspect I'd miss Touch ID.. so maybe this is a good middle ground.
 
  • Like
Reactions: return2sendai
It's why the original SE form factor sales were good. The 2020 iPhone 8S won't be replacing that demographic.
Correct. The iphone SE (2 ) though will be looking for a somewhat different, but overlapping demographic. Those with older phones that want a "budget" phone. If the XR is any indication, this might be a runaway best seller.
 
They should have reused the iPhone Xr parts and went with a lower price of $299.

That wouldn’t hurt their margins that much and would make a 6 years old design more enticing for budget buyers.
 
Correct. The iphone SE (2 ) though will be looking for a somewhat different, but overlapping demographic. Those with older phones that want a "budget" phone. If the XR is any indication, this might be a runaway best seller.
Since I wasn't interested in the XR (really much too big for my taste), I haven't been paying attention. Has it been that big a seller?
 
What if the white shows the back of the white and the black shows the front of the black ? I understand that my reasoning is probably wrong but...
I think I understand what you mean, but even looking at other images on apple’s website of the white SE 2 shows it has a black bezel like the other two color options.
 

Attachments

  • 697925CD-A2FB-4F8A-B0B1-3B0533047C30.png
    697925CD-A2FB-4F8A-B0B1-3B0533047C30.png
    1.2 MB · Views: 106
This is a great device for those of us who don't want to drop $1k on a phone, but I still long for a 4" screen form factor, which was perfect for one-handed usability and front-pocket fit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lkalliance
I have concerns about the upcoming 5.4" iPhone 12.

The drawings predict that this new model will have nearly the same physical dimensions as the old 4" SE... but with an edge-to-edge 5.4" screen. That sounds great.

However... physically speaking... the body is very small. There will have to be substantial miniaturization to get all the goodies inside it.

I don't think people realize how much smaller an old SE-sized body is compared to the current iPhone 11. It's quite different. Remarkably different. That's less room for battery, less room for cameras and other sensors, etc.

Below is what an iPhone SE looks like compared to the iPhone 11.

Notice the difference in physical body size.

Are we sure Apple can put iPhone 12 components inside a body roughly the same size as the old SE ?

mCnYCbS.jpg
I agree that's a really interesting question!

I'm intending to purchase the SE, so as I am not going to buy the next flagship, count me in as "curious" rather than "concerned," but it's still an interesting question.

Not just the miniaturization of parts, but also of the interface, maybe? I know it's supposed to be a 5.4" screen...but I wonder if gestures will feel cramped on the smaller chassis. On the other hand I swipe up all the time on the current SE to get to Control Center, so perhaps I'm overthinking it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michael Scrip
Since I wasn't interested in the XR (really much too big for my taste), I haven't been paying attention. Has it been that big a seller?
There was some article about the XR in MR not too long ago. The XR was the best selling phone, but I can't remember the time period, nor can I remember the geographic region.
 
Not appropos of the rest of this post, I agree with this. There's the physical size of the thing, which crosses a threshold where handling it requires different mechanics (in a way that the 4" iPhone didn't require different mechanics to the 3.5" iPhone). So there's that trade-off to the larger screen size. But I believe the sleep button placement is going to drive me nuts until I get new muscle memory: the sleep button SHOULD be on the top in a perfect world: it would lead to fewer accidental sleeps I would imagine. But the phone's height surpasses a point where it would be easy to just reach with your index finger to the top and hit the button, so clearly it had to be moved. But I will miss that placement.

I have a small child. Imagine my excitement to catch that “instant pose” or “cuteness” with a raise-to-wake, swipe left on lock screen, landscape for video clip, click the shutter button, ...and the damn thing goes back to sleep.

Now I have an iPhone-shaped hole in my wall.

I told the Apple Store associate that’s why I swapped my iPhone 6 for the SE and paid cash in full. I abhor that shell design. The designer should be raked over the coals for it, and whomever approved it past DVT should be fired. The camera bump just reeks of laziness for the design team. Yet it still remains in use today... I’ll never understand why.

I cannot and will not trade my SE for any new iPhone without a significant shell redesign. I know I’m one of 4 or 5 people on the planet who cares, but I’ll continue holding Apple accountable.

I also go case-less because the design is a thing of beauty and should be displayed proudly. With the SE design and square body, I can hold it with an easier grip than I ever could my iPhone 6. Plus, it lays flat and can hold stable on its edge for a remote photo shutter with my Apple Watch. You can’t do a remote photo with the Apple Watch and the iPhone 6-11pro design. That feature of the watch is useless otherwise. (I’ve done several remote photos and videos with my watch and SE, because I can).

I guess I’m “old” now. :) I’ll be one of those renegade tech nerds from some bad tech movie that lurks in seedy bars and whines about “the grid”.. haha
 
Not looking to buy the new SE, but what a great deal? A13 processor, Apple's great cameras, strong software support, many of the latest features (Wi-Fi 6, 2x2 MIMO, Band 71, power reserve for transit and Apple Pay), TouchID, water resistance, wireless charging, fast charging, stereo recording. It's a great successor to the iPhone 8 and blows the original SE away w/ newer features and improved specs.

If I needed a new phone on a budget? The $400 SE would be the one to go for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MartyvH
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.