When was the superdrive intro'd?
According to
Wikipedia, 2001. Though I'm not sure I understand the relevance of your question?
The graphics switch (9400M to 9600 or vice versa) requires logging out and logging back in - which falls in teh lame category as Vista on Sony Vaio can do it with just a button flip.
Coming to think of it - really doesn't sound that inconvenient for people who are not going to switch between playing games while on AC and working on documents when on battery - not many people do that kind of a thing.
But still, technically it is lame to require a logout.
There's a video of it on
engadget - the process is entirely automatic, and takes 14 seconds. I wouldn't worry about it too much.
I agree with many of your points.
<snip>
...As some have stated (as well as you), there will likely be a market for Matte screen covers that can easily be applied (someone needs to put time into an easy application system), and provide the anti glare surface that will be highly desirable. The only issue that I see with them is the cost. I doubt anyone will make one for less than $40, as the iPod / iPhone versions are already $14 (absurd price for the type of plastic, and size of the protectors).
I could care less about many of the items other people are complaining about, And am Really excited to see what Snow Leopard will feel like on the new MBP when they add the GPU processing support. It appears to be a good solid system, with some good processing power.
The only thing that seriously pauses me from buying one, is the lack of the Core 2 Extreme processors, and eSATA options. I agree that the MBP is a great system (even if the Professionals they are after now appear to be Marketing / Business as opposed to Photo / Video / graphics professionals), and am still considering one despite the letdowns. Me moving to Lenovo is still an option, however I would also have to replace lots of Mac software I currently use

.
$40 is right - kabunaru posted a link to
these guys, who already sell them for the (presumbly) previous models - $35 for 15", $40 for 17"! However, given the cost of producing two separate models, what with manufacturing, increased shipping necessitated by greater variety, &c., I wonder what the price increase to the consumer would have been if they had implemented a matte option as well?
eSata would also be nice; I've been looking at getting a
stage rack so I can add more storage without having to buy more external drive cases - but I think it's too niche a port to include, especially at the expense of one of the other ports. There are
ExpressCard eSata adaptors though - not quite as nice as an integrated port, to be sure, but they get the job done? It would be nice to have seen a bigger CPU bump - quad core would be nice, but then, for me, it makes it easier to resist upgrading so soon

! Speaking as someone who just switched
from Windows, I'd recommend against it. It's unpleasant enough, even without the cost of replacing your software!
I'm also pretty excited about the possibilities of Snow Leopard, and I really like the GPU-switching idea.
USB 2.0 is currently faster than FW400 on paper, but there's a darned good reason that most of the audio interfaces produced in the last 7 years have been designed for FW instead - USB never lived up to it, and has a way higher incidence of dropped signals, clicking, popping, buffer underruns, and a host of other issues that royally screw up real-time audio recording and low-latency multitracking with virtual instruments and signal processing.
I'm quite happy to defer to your expertise here, but it's not as though Apple has abandoned FireWire completely - they've simply stopped putting the Legacy FW400 port on their laptops, which I think really isn't something worth getting worked up over - certainly not to the extent that some people have, particularly considering the FW800 is backwards-compatible.