Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I have an old MBP that can’t run the latest Xcode or MacOS. What would you suggest? One of these M2 MBP or an M2 MacBook Air? Some Adobe Creative Cloud apps too.
 
1) Everyone did not get massive discounts. Most discounts were a couple of $hundred; meh.
couple of hundreds? try again, more like 400. that deal was offered by every major retailers, bestbuy, amazon, etc, if you still went and bought from apple i have a bridge to sell you. 🤣
2) M2 chips are larger, have far more transistors and have tens of thousands of engineering hours beyond the years-old M1. Not barely incremental.
and what does that translate to, oh right, 20% at best with multi tasking, you can pep talk all you want, at the end of the day, your opinion does not reflect reality.
3) WiFi 6E, HDMI, etc. improvements will be very relevant over the 2023 to 2029 lives of these new M2 MBPs. Not barely incremental.
ha, i'm gonna set myself a reminder and hit you up couple of years from now, consider the very fact that wifi A/C is still very much functional, and preferred due to better wall penetration, and gigabyte internet is still a very niche market for the foreseeable future, i'm definitely not in the minority when i say these things you are propping up are in fact, very incremental.

and one more thing, this thing will not sell like the m1 pro because everyone and their grandma knows the real upgrade is coming next year with m3 with a 3nm die shrink. apple released this incremental upgrade to keep their portfolio leveled.
 
Sheeeesh! Expensive where is the MacBook Pro in Midnight?

Sorry Apple, no Midnight MacBook 💻 Pro. I will have to pass. Lost opportunity!
Right? WTF, a Pro MBP M2 for a gazillion beans and we don't even get a couple of colors like the cool kids? It's literally just as easy to make a midnight MBP as it is a MBA. You know for a fact that SJ would've made a few colors for the "pros".

dang, I really thought we'd get black… these colors are so stale
Big time stale.
 
A very, very incremental update.

No new features that I can actually benefit from (no 8K displays in my place, no Wi-Fi 6E too), so my 14" base M1 Pro (got it with a discount) is not in danger at all.
I wasn't expecting much more.
But 20% processor and 30% GPU increases ain't nuthin' though...

That said, I'm not upgrading an M1 MacBook Pro Max with this; I'm upgrading my high-end MBP 15" from 2015, so it's a welcome upgrade!

Features I can benefit from? Well, I'm going to have this for 5-7 years, so who knows what I'll be taking advantage of in the future...?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert and throAU
14“ & 16” starting at £2,149.00 & £2,699.00 in the U.K. WOW😱
On the other hand...

My 15" 'touchbar' macbook pro cost me £3149 in 2016. It came with 16GB RAM, a Radeon 'Pro' 460 graphics & 1TB ssd, and a butterfly keyboard (!)

That 14" M2 Max at £3,349 looks pretty tempting. Expensive yes. But not crazy imo
 
Last edited:
Who can afford this crap. They literally brought the production down to a single in-house chip and it costs more than ever.. this is all about profit profit profit. The SoC should be making things more affordable. What is wrong with this company. They pretend like they are the fastest machines in the universe. The GPU is still an internal GPU only useable on MacOS. This machine is not business class as it can't run Windows anymore. They are out to lunch. There is goign to be a day people get tired of logic and final cut and what will apple be doing then.
I paid basically the same for my 14” M1 Pro as I did for my 2011 15” pro in actual dollar amounts.

My 14” pro runs windows arm64 in parallels better than most of the enterprise machines we get at work. I’m not joking. Desktop or notebook. Everything works. Sleep works properly.

It runs windows in parallels much better than my intel MacBook machines ever did natively.
 
Who can afford this crap. They literally brought the production down to a single in-house chip and it costs more than ever.. this is all about profit profit profit. The SoC should be making things more affordable.

So say 25% performance improvement give or take, and 8% inflation-- a quick calculation says these laptops just got about 35% cheaper before even accounting for the HDMI, WiFi, increased battery life and other features.

The level of cynicism in these threads is unbelievable. I wouldn't have expected that they'd be able to deliver that much of a performance boost all else equal-- if it holds up under broader testing that's pretty remarkable.
 
It's not overplayed. My M2 MacBook Air can become slower than my 5 year old Intel MacBook Pro even when it starts to thermal throttle.

The M2 MacBook Air is the 1st computer I have ever owned where I have to think about what I am going to do with it before using it. But it is now downgraded to the same duties as my M1 12.9 iPad Pro, so I don't have to worry too much about it anymore.
I'm very interested in this issue. I have a 2016 15" MBP and use Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop a lot, which does task my current system. I've been thinking about the new/predicted 15" MBA as a way to avoid the bulk of the latest MBP models, but will I basically get the same level of performance as my current machine if I go with a new MBA? That would be super disappointing if so. Should I avoid the MBA line if I need a high level of performance?
 
Honest question, what would be a good use case for 96GB ram?
There are certain Wolfram Mathematica operations that can be quite memory hungry and would benefit from a large amount of RAM. Stephen Wolfram should definitely be packing one of these RAM-heavy M2 MBPs. I'm guessing that particle physics simulations can be real pigs, too.
 
I'm very interested in this issue. I have a 2016 15" MBP and use Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop a lot, which does task my current system. I've been thinking about the new/predicted 15" MBA as a way to avoid the bulk of the latest MBP models, but will I basically get the same level of performance as my current machine if I go with a new MBA? That would be super disappointing if so. Should I avoid the MBA line if I need a high level of performance?
My 2019 MBP 16" i7 is 20% faster than my MBA M1 16GB on slow Handbrake encodings via software. Advice: don't buy a MBA (even the upcoming 15") if you want much faster multi-core performance than a 2019 Intel MBP 16". The M1/M2 on the MBA has only 4 CPU performance cores and no active cooling.
 
So say 25% performance improvement give or take, and 8% inflation-- a quick calculation says these laptops just got about 35% cheaper before even accounting for the HDMI, WiFi, increased battery life and other features.

The level of cynicism in these threads is unbelievable. I wouldn't have expected that they'd be able to deliver that much of a performance boost all else equal-- if it holds up under broader testing that's pretty remarkable.

I agree.

This was my fear: That I'd passed up on some of those discounts on the M1 MBP 16" and now this new model was going to cost me significantly more with inflation (obviously, I paid more than if I'd taken some of those deals).

I think I paid the same as when I was pricing out the M1 MBP Max, but I've got more cores than I would have with a 25%-ish improvement (although, those cores might literally be that percent improvement, so maybe I shouldn't word it that way).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Analog Kid
Oh man... You'll regret 32GB RAM choice. Everything else was great, only that one drawback. You are still on time to go up to at least 64GB RAM. Really!
i can testify to that lol
Screenshot 2023-01-17 at 9.46.33 PM.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amazing Iceman
For all those saying this is not a good update, and that it's more of an incremental update...at least it's an update!

Would you rather us still be with Intel and only get updates once every few years? For a lot of people, this update will serve them just fine if they are updating from anything but an M1 Max.

From those updating from the M1 Max, they will want to wait till the M3 Max. It was like this with most prior updates.

Be happy we are getting something and Apple is not making their products stale by only releasing them once every few years.
 
You do have the option of applying a skin to your existing MacBook Air/Pro, you know. Wraplus makes some nice ones that aren’t too hard to apply. Then you can have the color and design you want.

I know, it’s not the same, but at least there are ways to personalize your Mac like this. I usually don’t stick things on my machines, but I was impressed with Wraplus’ skins and have used two so far. I think they should peel off as easily as they went on, when I don’t want them any more.
Let us know how the unwrap goes?

I prefer a hard case, so I lose that effect except for the keyboard/topcase.
 
My wallet is screaming!!!

Canadian prices:

$2,599 for 14-inch base
$3,199 for 16-inch base

*sigh*

Yeah I feel your pain bro!

So, this is why they withheld 4K 120hertz HDMI and Wifi 6E from M1 Pro/Max...

Lol. Yeah. But this upgrade is for older laptop users that missed out on the M1 Pro MBPs or M1 Max models. Or those still waiting for business upgrade eligibility. Much better performance from Intel when consider release to releases.

you mean

$2,599 for 14-inch base
$3,199 for 16-inch base

that's an extra $100 you were missing. what a joke because base config is basically crap.
you are looking at $4000+ for any configuration worthwhile to last you more than 3-4 years. There is no upgradability so you are forced to spend it upfront. At least back in the day you could buy third party ram to make your machine last longer. This SoC crap is an inventive way for apple to reap all those RAM profit margins and storage upgrade profit margins upfront. Just a disgusting company now. Like, REALLY disgusting. I have no idea why people keep buying this crap and supporting the greed.

Yeah the pricing is up there. Still you’d need a gaming laptop or one with q dedicated video card to compete with M2 Pro/Max.

What you fail to look at is:
Applications and comfort ability in using them as well as workflow in such a computing environment.

If it saves someone 2 mins doing mundane tasks several 10’s/100’s of times a days that’s over an hour vs a computing platform just to save initial $200 give or take. It’s about the work being done.
 
My 2019 MBP 16" i7 is 20% faster than my MBA M1 16GB on slow Handbrake encodings via software. Advice: don't buy a MBA (even the upcoming 15") if you want much faster multi-core performance than a 2019 Intel MBP 16". The M1/M2 on the MBA has only 4 CPU performance cores and no active cooling.
Thanks @fbr$. That sounds like good advice. I’ll keep that in mind when making my next MBP purchase.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fbr$
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.