Seems pretty obvious to me that the two bridges are just saying developers need to have parallel development of their apps...one version for Macs and the other for iPhones.
I guess i'm just naive, but why would they release a G5 powerbook so shortly after releasing the Mb and MBP with the new Penryn's?
ZOMG!!!!!!!11!!!eleventy-one!1!!
you mean they didn't build a bridge and shoot it?
NOES!
what else are they not telling us!!!!11!
![]()
oh and anyone else notice that it ends on a friday? friday the 13th!?! hmmmm...![]()
also, on a completely unrelated note, friday the 13th is the day i graduate high school. ohhh boyy.
photoshopped.
They could still use the code names Couger, Lynx, Bobcat and Kitten. Mac OS X Lion just doesn't have nice ring to it. I hope Couger is the code name for 10.6.so exciting. I wish I could go.
lol. i know right. READ!
What happens when they run out of cats to name the OS?
I mean, a Lion is at the top of the food chain.
meh, two bridges, if this is iPhone and Mac, then what about iPod? or is iPod on a boat down below?
Is anybody listening?
I was complaining about the fact that the SDK was announced as "free" even though it costs 99 dollars a year if you actually use it. (Running apps in an emulator is not "using an SDK".)
Plus the 99 dollar offer won't be available to me (in Ireland) for another few months.
I don't care about the 99 dollars, I am annoyed because the SDK is marketed as "free" (although it isn't) and because Apple tell me that I cannot buy the key for another few months. It's ANNOYING.
If Apple had said the SDK is available for 99 dollars a year PLUS gave me a way to give them that money, I'd be happy.
But instead Apple have chosen to claim that the SDK is free PLUS won't allow me to use it as of yet.
Again, using the SDK to run an app in an emulator is NOT what the SDK is for. It's like a shareware version of the SDK.
When Apple said "free SDK" I was expecting the software required to build and run programs ion my iPhone, NOT an emulator.
And when Apple said "99 dollars a year" I was expecting that I would at least be allowed to BUY it.
Hence I have no great expectations from WWDC.
They could still use the code names Couger, Lynx, Bobcat and Kitten. Mac OS X Lion just doesn't have nice ring to it. I hope Couger is the code name for 10.6.
The pre-release is just that. I suspect the benefit of having a unified code base in June when the real bug fix and feature update release happens is one factor, as well as not having "non-compliant apps" in the wild before they are registered, etc.
With Apple, they are a closed system and they disclose that. Do not get upset when you want to use it then it self-enforces its rules you don't like.
Based on how I read your post, looks like you just want someone to get into an argument with you. At least that is what I get from your tone.
Sorry not biting.
OS 11![]()
What happens when they run out of cats to name the OS?
I mean, a Lion is at the top of the food chain.