iPhone ! Goes to Verizon Wireless! I called it.
I guess I'll hold out until then before buying a Droid Incredible.
iPhone ! Goes to Verizon Wireless! I called it.
Nonsense. OS X is a mature OS. Developers that develop for it really don't need anymore insight and Apple has already said its spreading out update intervals. Right now iPhone is still the new kid on the block, and the OS with real growth. Makes sense to focus on that. OS X isn't going away any time soon and we will see a 10.7 when it's needed.
-iPhone HD
- Brand new iMac with the AMD six core processors and the i5-520m processors replacing the Core 2 Duo
- Updated Macbooks with the same Nvidia graphics chip as the Macbook Pro 13 inch.
- Mac Pro with the 12 Core AMD processors Magny Cours chips.
I don't really think WWDC will appeal to beginners.
They don't need WWDC to start developing. They pay 99$ and be an ADC member, all the info they need about developing for OS X is available through extensive documentation.
WWDC hands on help is only required if there's a new OS and new API's in the future, which don't exist yet as a part of ADC documentation.
Like in 2008, when Apple only did announce the core features of Snow Leopard, there were presentations about Open CL and Grand Central in WWDC, and for that time, that was a new thing.
This years WWDC not focusing on OS X makes sense. 10.6 is already a new OS, 10.7 is not "soon". So probably the new API's for 10.7 aren't even ready to demonstrate yet.
Next year it'll be a lot more about OS X. This year is like 2008.
Yeah, it's pretty sad to see how little it's mentioned.
And if you decide what you will find before you look, you will certainly find it.
Seriously, did you ever think that maybe Apple wants to court more non-Mac developers to the Mac platform, and that the iPhone is the way to do it? Think about it - to develop for iPhone, you need a Mac. The iPhone is what the PC user wants to develop for, so by enticing him to come to WWDC to learn about iPhone development, he's then going to have to buy a Mac.
Seriously, how many of these comments do we need.![]()
Haven't people had enough? Why would Apple send the iPhone to a network that can not let people talk and use data at the same time? It would be a step back.
While Mac OS X is a mature OS, there are many people out there who don't know how to program for Mac OS X like Windows users, people who just started developing, etc.
Two thoughts on this. If 10.6 wasn’t such a non-update, this wouldn’t be as big of an issue.
And Jobs did say at the Leopard launch:
“I’m quite pleased with the pace of new operating systems every 12 to 18 months for the foreseeable future,” he said. “We’ve put out major releases on the average of one a year, and it’s given us the ability to polish and polish and improve and improve.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/22/technology/22apple.html?_r=1
Yet, 10.6 took 22 months. And we’re likely looking at even longer, likely 26 or more, for 10.7 assuming it’s not announced this year and Apple will wait to go through another WWDC before launching it sometime in late 2011.
With Microsoft rumored to release Windows 8 in 2011 and the goodwill Windows 7 has generated this past year (compared to Vista or really even 10.6), the pressure is building for something new on the Mac OS X side.
WOW...they cut the IT Portion, and all the extremists come out. They're cutting OSX, or abandoning it...?? EASY! What more could they offer, in terms of big items, other than iPhone? Blue Ray? Please...; they just released new laptops, and iMac's not that long ago. I guess MacPros, and they may..we'll have to wait and see.
I doubt they'll call it iPhone 4G because it would easily get confusing for consumers. Sprint runs 4G Network ads all the time in the states, so some consumers may think if they buy the iPhone 4G, it'll be faster download speeds than the 3GS, which isn't true.Would people stop calling it the iPhone HD noone has mentioned HD so why do people keep calling it that ????? The obvious name will be iPhone 4G
Mac OS X - what more can you squeeze out of a traditional computer, other than speed and UI changes.
OS X and the iPad OS will eventually merge. It's a gradual process, and probably the smartest thing Apple can do.
Now that multitasking is on the iPhone, just use Skype and now you can make calls and use data at the same time. You'll also save your cell minutes. For $2.95 a month you can get unlimited minutes with skype to any phone in the U.S. and Canada. That problem is fixed and will actually save you some money because you can lower your minutes and save on your total cell bill. So now you have phone calls and data at the same time on Verizon. Done.ineedamac said:Seriously, how many of these comments do we need.
Haven't people had enough? Why would Apple send the iPhone to a network that can not let people talk and use data at the same time? It would be a step back.
iPhone ! Goes to Verizon Wireless! I called it.
And if you decide what you will find before you look, you will certainly find it.
Seriously, did you ever think that maybe Apple wants to court more non-Mac developers to the Mac platform, and that the iPhone is the way to do it? Think about it - to develop for iPhone, you need a Mac. The iPhone is what the PC user wants to develop for, so by enticing him to come to WWDC to learn about iPhone development, he's then going to have to buy a Mac.
Nonsense. OS X is a mature OS. Developers that develop for it really don't need anymore insight and Apple has already said its spreading out update intervals.
I'm quite happy with SL at the moment and I really dont see the need for a Major upgrade every year personally I think this may be the last 10. relase till 11 cause hasn't the past 7,8,9 gone up to .6 anyway ? i think 9 only went to 5 but still.
The only reason I hope that happens is that it may finally force AT&T to give us tethering.
Oh goody. Mac OS X is an afterthought.![]()
But when Leopard came out Apple said that intervals between major releases would be shorter.
It's a completely different thing. Verizon doesn't support voice and data at the same time, so this isn't possible but AT&T does support voice & data simultaneously therefore that's where the guys original quote came from.
OS X and the iPad OS will eventually merge. It's a gradual process, and probably the smartest thing Apple can do.