What does this have to do with your argument? Vaccinated Icelanders contract covid at a much lower rate than the unvaccinated.Iceland covid data shows majority of covid cases are fully vaccinated: https://www.covid.is/data
If you are vaccinated, the probability of contracting Covid is much smaller than if you were unvaccinated.
The unvaccinated are most dangerous to other unvaccinated people. The longer that the virus continues to be contracted by humans, the more likely it can mutate into another strain. Future strains may not be blocked by current vaccines, so we'll have to keep getting vaccinated.
Thank you for your concern!People here that are against being vaccinated always talk about freedom of choice.
If it your choice not to be vaccinated; will you just stay home and out.of the hospital? You already said doctors don't know.
Will you foot the whole medical bill, since your medical provider has said get vaccinated?
Will you not ask the government to help you out because they tried by offering the vaccine for FREE?
I bet most anti-vax people don't really want the full responsibility only the decision part.
And for those that think the vaccine that is FDA approved is still experimental and you don't know what's in it?
You do know if you catch covid there aren't many FDA approved and vert little that isn't experimental that can save your life, right? And you know what's in everything you ingest and understand the chemical formulations you see on a box or whatever? You can tell me all the side effects and contraindications for even Tylenol?
I have lost all compassion for people that willfully won't get vaccinated. If you get sick too dang bad.
I hope all employers, schools, restaurants, hotels and every other public venue requires a vaccination card or an valid waiver card for those that cannot be legitimately vaccinated.
It is legal. Does not violate your rights.
you can't get hiv by standing next to someoneWhen will they survey the HIV-Status of their slaves?
Smart doctor — and this supports that conclusion:Well, I had it back in February. Just had blood work done a few weeks ago. My doctor tells me there is no medical reason for me to get this medication because I am naturally immune. Given that he's a Johns Hopkins immunologist who knows me and my medical history and answered all of my pointed questions, I am OK with his medical opinion on the matter.
Long term impacts from CV19 are as rare as complications from the vaccine. Boogey men from both sides. The vaccine poses no long term danger in vast vast majority, and surviving CV19 poses no longer term danger in the vast majority of people.
Young people are probably better off getting the virus since it confers best immunity. Remember for the young, on average, this presents like a mild cold. It has literally no impact on them beyond very mild symptoms. Obviously not true for any at risk people and I would encourage vaccination in all of them.
Ivermectin data more controversial and still ongoing, but not robust so far.
Just read over it again and still don't really see how it's that, but sure.I submitted the post as humor, at least for people who choose not to vaccinate, but I appreciate your analysis and fact checking.
The CDC and others have changed the guidance and stats over the course of the pandemic because:I think most people who choose not vaccinate know or and don't argue there are real benefits to getting vaccinated. I think what some people don't understand or choose to acknowledge is that people should be able to choose what they put into their bodies and are ok with the additional risk of severe illness or death, especially when the CDC have changed the their guidance & statistics so frequently over the course of almost 2 years.
Already gone over this before literally in response to you earlier.But if you get the vaccine you can still spread it right?
Seeing as getting vaccinated does not, and cannot "override [your] natural immunity" because that is just not how the immune system works, I'm just a tad cynical that an actual immunologist actually said this, though would love to hear him explain how that's the case, and why almost every medical and scientific organisation that recommends people still get vaccinated even if they've had COVID previously, are wrong.Gosh, I guess I should point my experienced immunologist to...a web page.
I asked him what the risks were when I got my blood results back a couple of weeks ago. He said best case, no effect since the natural immunity is durable. Worst case, he had no decent information (something about the lack of longitudinal studies or something like that...whatever) so based on the known knowns and known unknowns he said he saw no medical reason to try and override my natural immunity.
So despite that piece you cite being on the Internet, I will still trust my doctor who did an actual examination of me, treated me when I was sick, and abides by medical ethics. No offense.
No, what that graphs shows is that somewhat less people got it, though the numbers weren't that different (thanks Delta!), but way less people died from it. This is also consistent with the studies we have looking at what happened as well.Have you considered even a little bit the fact that lots of people got Covid and they have natural immunity now and so that could make the numbers better? This graph doesn't really say anything other than less people got it and died from it now. Assuming it's because of the vaccine is really brave.
If you could finally link to the studies you keep talking about, that'd be great. Though again, I don't know why you wouldn't just err on the safe side and get vaccinated so you have an even better prepared immune system.John Hopkins should update their website. Thats yesterdays news. I made a longer post above. It does not appear that vaccination in survivors provides any benefit. Survivors have immunity at highest rates and with durable response so far outstripping everything. We dont know how long the vaccine lasts...thats not a useful argument against natural immunity. But we can presume based on lots of prior data that it will last a very long time. In Italy data it is doing great at a year. No surprise.
The most anti-science presumption countering a 100 years of immunology is that natural immunity would be inferior. You would always assume the opposite, and wait for the data confirming that assumption. The data is in.
Unfortunately this just isn't true at all. The estimates definitely vary, but long COVID is much more common than any serious side effects from getting vaccinated. Even aside from the data, hell, I personally know 3 people dealing with it right now and dear god it's ****.Long term impacts from CV19 are as rare as complications from the vaccine. Boogey men from both sides. The vaccine poses no long term danger in vast vast majority, and surviving CV19 poses no longer term danger in the vast majority of people.
While I agree with much of your post, the good news is that this isn't correct. If you're vaccinated your odds of getting infected are much lower:If you are vaccinated, the possibility of contracting COVID is the same as if you were unvaccinated. The development of the infection into a symptomatic hot mess is lower, potentially, depending on immunological response, and viral load.
I'd appreciate a link to any papers you've published on the subject.Seeing as getting vaccinated does not, and cannot "override [your] natural immunity" because that is just not how the immune system works, I'm just a tad cynical that an actual immunologist actually said this, though would love to hear him explain how that's the case, and why almost every medical and scientific organisation that recommends people still get vaccinated even if they've had COVID previously, are wrong.
Face it, toots. This isn’t about anything other than “fighting the liberal agenda”...for you and your brethren.I'd appreciate a link to any papers you've published on the subject.
Neat thing about my doctor - he is good at distilling complex things into terms an old TACCO can understand. But hey, when I go for my follow up in six months I'll be sure to bring a tape recorder.![]()
Not once have I put this in political terms.Face it, toots. This isn’t about anything other than “fighting the liberal agenda”...for you and your brethren.
Political MacRumors is spicy, who knewI wonder if they meant to disable comments
Don't argue with them they stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night. Lol.Wow, so you know everyone's personal medical history/status? If Apple can afford all the other myriad people working for them, they can afford a small number of unvaccinated people with prohibitive medical conditions. And nobody should have to "share" his/her medical records.
*** This post has been modified from its original form***
LMAONo, my argument is not weak, your is because I completely contradicted it with numerous examples of freedoms that were temporarily limited and then returned. That’s it, game over for you.
Nope, they are still tracking cases where vaccinated people get hospitalised and die.CDC stopped tracking covid in the vaccinated,
That is not even slightly what that is and I'm not even sure where to begin. This isn't hiding any risks of the (very safe) vaccines, and you don't need to read OSHA reports to have informed consent for a vaccine. Do you think there are OSHA reports for the vaccines you had as a baby?OSHA removed the requirement for employers to report vaccine side effects from vaccines they are mandating for their employees.
OSHA says they do not want to increase vaccine hesitancy by publishing side effects.
They are admitting that they want to hide the true risk from people. How can you have informed consent?
It's more that you're saying things that are the opposite of what the vast majority of scientific and medical organisations recommend, which seem to defy the fundamentals of how the immune system works, and don't appear to have provided evidence to back these claims up beyond "I swear my doctor said this".More than a few people here seem to be upset that I'm following the medical advice of my doctor rather than...them. Odd.
I'd appreciate a link to any papers you've published on the subject.
News to me this is a court of law. Shall I call my doctor as a witness here?It's more that you're saying things that are the opposite of what the vast majority of scientific and medical organisations recommend, which seem to defy the fundamentals of how the immune system works, and don't appear to have provided evidence to back these claims up beyond "I swear my doctor said this".
Yeah, I'll ask him for his CV when I see him at my follow up.how about the papers your doctor has published on the subject?
More fake than fake news. You aren't fooling anyone. Maybe you listen to your doctor, because he tells you what you want to hear. Normals call those people quacks. Or, maybe you're lying. Republicans lie like they breathe.Not once have I put this in political terms.
Frankly I don't give a fig about any of that, Jabby.
More than a few people here seem to be upset that I'm following the medical advice of my doctor rather than...them. Odd.
You seem awfully intent on believing I either want or care about your approval.More fake than fake news. You aren't fooling anyone. Maybe you listen to your doctor, because he tells you what you want to hear. Normals call those people quacks. Or, maybe you're lying. Republicans lie like they breathe.
And, oh yes...you do care about that...very much.
Unfortunately this just isn't true at all. The estimates definitely vary, but long COVID is much more common than any serious side effects from getting vaccinated. Even aside from the data, hell, I personally know 3 people dealing with it right now and dear god it's ****.
While I agree with much of your post, the good news is that this isn't correct. If you're vaccinated your odds of getting infected are much lower:
I posted this before but here's a thread from an immunologist going over it as well: