Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well again, what I said was "it doesn't prevent it in every case, but it does make a significant difference". There's also this thread from an immunologist too.


Yeah, I'm certainly not saying you're silly to not love doing that. The closest I've personally gotten to an unvaccinated person in the last 24 hours was to help someone who works in my building work out where to go to get vaccinated tomorrow. Though I guess you can maybe make an argument that as I'm in a vaccine trial maybe I should spend more time around unvaccinated people and challenge it a bit? 😉

Looks like we are in agreement. I was just a bit hung up on the meaning of prevention when describing this which in my mind leaned closer to immunity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hop
I believe in the vaccine too, but just for comparison... what's the death rate of Covid compared to getting in or being around a vehicle. Once you find out, you'll realized we should also ban all forms of motorized transportation.
Except motorized transportation provides a benefit that vastly outweighs the cost. COVID provides zero benefit so the ratio of cost/benefit is infinite.
 
As far as I am concerned, he is an authority in my case, as he examined me, treated me, and I have hired him for his services in this regard.

Expecting someone to follow medical advice absent those conditions seems foolish to me, and I suggest people talk to their own doctors and make their own decisions. His advice and expertise are sufficient for me.

On the other hand, if there is a qualified MD posting in this thread that has a different opinion, I wouldn't mind getting an idea of his/her qualifications and experience and use those opinions to inform any questions I have at my next visit. But absent that, I'll stick with my personal doctor's medical opinion, thanks.

the point isn't really you sticking with your personal doctor's medical opinion. it is that you are spreading dangerous and indeed potentially deadly misinformation online (that there is no reason for one to be vaccinated if they have already had covid) and appealing to an authority (your doctor, who you've claimed also happens to be an expert immunologist) without providing any evidence to that authorities expertise, or indeed even existence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redbeard331 and hop
I will go one better: all companies should allow those than can work from home to do it. No forced return to offices, regardless of need.
For how long? Another year? Two? What do you think is Apple’s motivation to get a significant number of their workforce back into the office, maybe by the end of the year? Personally, I think it has to do with productivity and security. Maybe I’m wrong. Maybe they just don’t like having an almost empty Apple Park?
 
I believe in the vaccine too, but just for comparison... what's the death rate of Covid compared to getting in or being around a vehicle. Once you find out, you'll realized we should also ban all forms of motorized transportation.
You choose to get into a car, you dont choose to get a deadly virus.

false equivalence for 500 alex.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HVDynamo
Dear god can you please stop spamming
I often wonder why someone can be so aggressive about another’s personal choice to be hesitant about the vaccine.

Despite multiple linking, you haven’t debunked much of anything, nor you begun to approach the other 90% of the linked studies. You referenced, 7-8 studies out of 75+. You can’t refute 6 studies and clap your hands and say “hah, your dumb for being hesitant”

You’re position is clear, as marked by the aggressive demeanor in your post, you do not respect people who have hesitancy to this vaccine. So much so that you will aggressively combat them for their own choice.

Am I aggressively telling others they are wrong for taking the vaccine? No, I respect their choice.

Here, I’m just defending my own viewpoint with over 75+ linked studies. And you do not respect this. You do not respect my choice. You’ve blanketed everything as ‘misinformation’ after reviewing just a fraction of what I presented.
 
the point isn't really you sticking with your personal doctor's medical opinion. it is that you are spreading dangerous and indeed potentially deadly misinformation online (that there is no reason for one to be vaccinated if they have already had covid) and appealing to an authority (your doctor, who you've claimed also happens to be an expert immunologist) without providing any evidence to that authorities expertise, or indeed even existence.
Are you tired from moving those goalposts yet?

The most I said was my doctor said something to me for my case.

You seem awfully programmed to argue against something you're more comfortable arguing against, instead of actually listening to what someone is saying.

Might want to look into that.
 
For how long? Another year? Two? What do you think is Apple’s motivation to get a significant number of their workforce back into the office, maybe by the end of the year? Personally, I think it has to do with productivity and security. Maybe I’m wrong. Maybe they just don’t like having an almost empty Apple Park?
Their motivation is to justify that billion dollar palace they built.

As far as productivity, I can only go by my own university, I can't speak for Apple or anyone else, but when we went to work from home, productivity stayed the same (we could still do 100 percent of our job at home, supporting a vmware environment) and sickness call ins went down by 1/3.

Not everyone at Apple can work from home, but I bet a lot of them could.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WitchDoktor
My employer wanted me to return without any mask or vaccination mandate in place. I immediately went to my Dr and got a WFH extension through HR. can’t be around people that have no interest in protecting others.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WitchDoktor
My employer wanted me to return without any mask or vaccination mandate in place. I immediately went to my Dr and got a WFH extension through HR. can’t be around people that have no interest in protecting others.
That seems to be a very reasonable compromise.
 
Giving that edit button a workout, I see.

Frankly, with all the crap in my life that could have killed me, walking around with natural immunity doesn't even make the top ten.

One principle I did pick up along the way was to decrease the noise obscuring the signal wherever I can. So you'll understand my conclusion that you are no longer worthy of the honor of my attention.

Good luck!
Yet…another lie! 😆 Dream on, toots.
 
I often wonder why someone can be so aggressive about another’s personal choice to be hesitant about the vaccine.

Despite multiple linking, you haven’t debunked much of anything, nor you begun to approach the other 90% of the linked studies. You referenced, 7-8 studies out of 75+. You can’t refute 6 studies and clap your hands and say “hah, your dumb for being hesitant”

You’re position is clear, as marked by the aggressive demeanor in your post, you do not respect people who have hesitancy to this vaccine. So much so that you will aggressively combat them for their own choice.

Am I aggressively telling others they are wrong for taking the vaccine? No, I respect their choice.

Here, I’m just defending my own viewpoint with over 75+ linked studies. And you do not respect this. You do not respect my choice. You’ve blanketed everything as ‘misinformation’ after reviewing just a fraction of what I presented.
You aren’t defending anything. You keep throwing links around like they vaccinate you from truth, but can’t defend them individually. Nobody is interested in addressing everything at once when it’s already clear that most of the individual pieces don’t stand up to scrutiny.

Heck, you can’t even clarify why you’ve included some of those links, let alone defend them.
 
You aren’t defending anything. You keep throwing links around like they vaccinate you from truth, but can’t defend them individually. Nobody is interested in addressing everything at once when it’s already clear that most of the individual pieces don’t stand up to scrutiny.

Heck, you can’t even clarify why you’ve included some of those links, let alone defend them.
Here you presented no data and attacked the speaker. I will not respond to this.
 
Are you tired from moving those goalposts yet?

The most I said was my doctor said something to me for my case.

You seem awfully programmed to argue against something you're more comfortable arguing against, instead of actually listening to what someone is saying.

Might want to look into that.

I did not move any goalposts nor did i argue against anything.

I merely gave you the opportunity to back up your extraordinary claim in order to convince us that it is not misleading and deceptive nonsense, which you have refused to do
 
Here you presented no data and attacked the speaker. I will not respond to this.

no surprise there, we await your next wall of text of the same nonsensical misinformation and refusal to engage anyone who actually tries to refute your points
 
  • Like
Reactions: hop
You wanted me to doxx my doctor.

Everything else is just your post hoc face saving justification.

I didn't want you to doxx your doctor. as I've already explained, I was giving you the opportunity to back up your claim. I'm not post hoc justifying anything. my intention should have been clear the entire time
 
Here you presented no data and attacked the speaker. I will not respond to this.
Attack is a bit melodramatic, don’t you think? Especially for someone willing to misattribute and repeatedly refuse to correct, quotations. Criticize? Sure. I’ve been following your discussion across at least two threads and seen you keep copying the same manifesto. I’ve watched @hop patiently engage you in detail, while you complain that they’ve only taken the time to systematically disassemble and educate you (and us) on some starting percentage of your copy pasta.

I don’t have time to put that effort into your whole word jumble, so I’ve been going through a little at a time. You don’t like that either. You say:
I look forward to any thing else you might see wrong or in error.
but then refuse to explain your innuendos well enough to be argued with. Must simply be because you can’t defend them, so you simply imply things and hide behind the sheer number of disembodied links you try to bury the discussion in.

Here you presented no data and attacked the speaker. I will not respond to this.
You don’t respond to data either. For example, when presented with analysis of the data behind your Iceland link, you fully ignore the response. I show you how very wrong your OSHA comments are, and you ignore it.
 
You don’t respond to data either. For example, when presented with analysis of the data behind your Iceland link, you fully ignore the response. I show you how very wrong your OSHA comments are, and you ignore it.
OSHA had requirements for mandated vaccines reporting in place, it is now revolked. Was I wrong?

There still remains dozens studies you didn’t address, and points. Until you can fully and unequivocally refute them, there is no ground to criticize me or others (be an apple employee) right to be hesitant for this vaccine.

I am all open ears to some other data you wish to discuss.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: hop
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.