but it's an entirely different issue when you talk smack about Bill and Melinda Gates foundation.
I'm not talking smack about the Gates Foundation. I'm talking smack about Bill Gates.
but it's an entirely different issue when you talk smack about Bill and Melinda Gates foundation.
You cannot know you want a red Corvette if the red Corvette does not exist.
You have provided no argument to rebut.
LOL!![]()
Jobs is Jobs..He is anything and everything people say so why is this a page 1 story ?
Maybe you would have seen the argument if you weren't so busy trying to ignore it.
The Gates have done incredible things with their money.
Microsoft and Apple aside, Jobs has almost no philanthropy to speak of.
Sorry to be so blunt but the truth hurts: Bill Gates has benefited humanity much more than Steve Jobs ever has and ever will.
The media at large is the problem here, not Apple or Steve Jobs.
Why would I care whether Jobs is narcisstic, or "arrogant", or whatever other personality trait people attribue to him.
At the risk of being labeled a fanboy, let's remind everyone why Apple is such a great company (and if this fits Steve, he can wear it with pride):
Here's to the crazy ones.
The misfits.
The rebels.
The troublemakers.
The round pegs in the square holes.
The ones who see things differently.
They're not fond of rules.
And they have no respect for the status quo.
You can praise them, disagree with them, quote them,
disbelieve them, glorify or vilify them.
About the only thing you can't do is ignore them.
Because they change things.
They invent. They imagine. They heal.
They explore. They create. They inspire.
They push the human race forward.
Maybe they have to be crazy.
How else can you stare at an empty canvas and see a work of art?
Or sit in silence and hear a song that's never been written?
Or gaze at a red planet and see a laboratory on wheels?
We make tools for these kinds of people.
While some see them as the crazy ones,
we see genius.
Because the people who are crazy enough to think
they can change the world...
...are the ones who do.
If you had made an intelligent argument, it would have been easier to rebut. Since you didn't, here goes anyway:
I never said they haven't. I criticized the way that money was made and the nature of the man donating it. If I rob a bank and donate 80% of my loot to charity, does that make me a hero? Apparently by your definition, yes.
You have absolutely nothing to base this claim on. Have you seen his tax return? Me neither. I have no idea what Jobs donates money to. Has he had a big public spectacle of a charity? No. At least not yet. Perhaps when he retires, we'll see the Steve Jobs Foundation. Until then, he's busy running a company and dealing with personal health issues.
I don't believe Jobs lives in a $150 million house (like Gates), and he wears the same freaking clothes every single day, so painting Jobs as some kind of gluttonous materialist is silly at best. You fail on this point. Hard.
I met Steve Jobs at Macworld a few years ago. I found him to be a very nice, even humble person, not the egomaniac they are trying to make him out to be. I told him we support him and his efforts to push great innovation. He was very gracious.
He may push hard, he may be a perfectionist, but look at what they accomplished!
Machead33![]()
Steve Jobs is this generation's Walt Disney.
They are not worthy to write about Glorious Leader. Stone the media that does not praise and glorify him.
Apparently the public agrees with me (as demonstrated by their pocketbooks when it comes to MS) and so do regulators as there seem to be no ethics probes in him.
Jobs is a primarily a sociopath. The narcissism goes along with the territory. And before you argue that he isn't a murderer, please educate yourself on the levels of sociopathy. The vast majority of sociopaths never physically harm anyone. He is obviously not suffering from the most severe form but he is a sociopath nonetheless.
Precisely my thought. I guess it's that small-man mentality of caring so much about whether a public figure, be it an actor or the president of the US, is someone you'd like to have a beer and a jolly good time with. Being someone you'd like to have a beer with is about the third from the bottom on the list of requirement for important jobs in the world, which means it's pretty much irrelevant.
I wonder how Apple "tries to discourage" profiles. My guess is a volley of lawsuits.
I could easily see Jobs as the dictator of a small nation--albeit a very fashionable one.
Walt Disney demanded perfection and was terrible to work with as well.
I don't doubt all of the Jobs bashing being true. Unfortunately, that's what it takes to promote innovation within a company. You NEED to be controlling. Without that edge, you'll end up like everyone else on the business block.