Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I ordered 64GB iPad 3G with case and standard dock. Opted for 2-3 day shipping in optimism in hopes that something would come earlier than it was supposed to...

Anyway - initial pre-auth was for $1 and maybe the $13 for shipping - don't quite remember. Right now I have two separate pending charges on my CC (BofA Visa) for $13.81 and $880.81. Interestingly enough though...logging on to my order status page on apple.com and I have NOTHING on my past 18 months orders, including iPad, when I have had several other orders in that time period...

Anyone have order status page screwed up like this?????

Try using your email address instead of your login id. I was using my login id and it only showed the Time Capsule I ordered last week. But when I used my full email to log in it show me the iPad pre-order.
 
My merchant agreements (all except Amex) all stated that i could not change until goods were delivered/shipped. Which I would assume is why retailers all have that same policy.....
 
charged yesterday

ordered first day, 64g 3G and was charged.................just have to wait and see
 
Apple Pre-Auth'd the 3G's in error. Apple Online Supervisor just got an email stating to do whatever it takes to reverse pre-auths - especially if they are debit cards and have emptied someone's bank account early. The pre-auths for the 3G's should have been placed a few days prior to shipping as with ALL mail order items.

Supervisor also SPECIFICALLY SAID that there is zero expectations that the 3G will be shipping any earlier than LATE APRIL as planned.

If you can't provide a name and contact phone number for said "Apple Online Supervisor"....didn't happen! :D
 
If you can't afford a $750 pre-authorization on the 3G iPad then you probably shouldn't be buying it in the first place... :rolleyes:
AMEN! I'm shocked that people have been talking (especially in the ipad forum thread on this) about shuffling money between accounts etc... to cover the authorization.
 
New iTunes

I got an email from Apple yesterday saying there was a problem with my credit card and my iPad order. When I called Apple to straighten it out, the customer service guy told me that there would be a new version of iTunes released on Saturday, April 3rd. He said this version would be needed to sync with the iPad, and download iPad specific apps.
 
AMEN! I'm shocked that people have been talking (especially in the ipad forum thread on this) about shuffling money between accounts etc... to cover the authorization.

I can sort of see why people are enjoying tsk-tsking over this, given the financial climate of the last few years and whatnot, but a lot of people have online savings accounts like ING Direct and don't keep a lot of cash in checking accounts. Transfers back from ING to another bank can take a few business days.
 
Hmmmm

So let me get this straight, you enter your creditcard number, you check the box that says i agree to pay this, and now you get charged, and you are upset......

I am happy they charged it finally, i hate having pending items out there.....
 
I think I'll still wait as I already have my iPod touch. Although, if some app becomes available that really makes this worth it, I'll bite -- without 3G, of course.

That sounds like me. I really had no intention of getting an iPad but I have since found some uses where it would be ideal. I don't have a laptop so with the bigger screen than the iPhone, it would be great to use to read while outside or in other parts of my house. But I'll wait a bit...
 
AMEN! I'm shocked that people have been talking (especially in the ipad forum thread on this) about shuffling money between accounts etc... to cover the authorization.

Well, I'm pretty sure I am the only one that mentioned that. I will explain I had too - not that it is any of your business. Just telling about the male species in my house.

I'm in the process of a nasty divorce.

We gave my daughter one for her birthday.

We got some tax refund money and split it minus the bday gift, he kept that. I was in no positin to argue at that point.

I preordered in the first 15 minutes, using my debit card. Told him how much it was and waited for the money.

And waited.

Meanwhile, ordered mine in a separate order, but it was a 3g version. I wasn't overly worried about not getting the money for hers yet because well, it's not late April.

Then the charge hits yesterday. Ironically, he finally decided to give me the cash for it at 5:30 yesterday, my bank closes at 5.

Sooooo, I have $750 to deposit to cover the charge of one i wasnt supposed to be paying for in the first place. I transfered money from savings to cover my 3g (I was $50 short if it matters) version once I heard they were indeed doing those too. All because I'm hopeful it will actually ship early. I didn't want to lose a spot in the queue.

See how the charge could throw your "budget" off???

Or i could just really say, men suck. Only fair since you are generalizing about why it could be a banking shock to have a $780 charge happen 4weeks early.
 
FWIW, my EDU rep also said that she expected the 3G models to go out a bit earlier than predicted -- mid-april instead of later in the month.
I don't think we'll see the 3G model until at least April 18, and most likely not until the end of April, as Apple has stated. Why? Because there will be a LOT of Wi-Fi-only models going to back to Apple for exchange if Apple doesn't get outside the 14-day return policy window. I know I'd gladly pay the $50-$60 restocking fee to 1) use the iPad with only Wi-Fi for a week or two and 2) instantly upgrade to the 3G.*

*instead of waiting until later this summer as I'd planned from the beginning...
 
These holds mean the iPad is coming sooner than Apple has stated. It also does not imply they won't come early.

Hrmmm....by all means, please state your answer in the form of a circumference.:confused: That took a moment, but I eventually realized what you were saying.
 
I actually spoke with an apple rep today who confirmed that my 64GB + 3G iPad will ship in mid April.

Keeping my fingers crossed. This corroborates with another poster from the March 12 pre-order thread that allegedly spoke with an Apple rep. I know, still no official word yet from Apple, but I'm just sayin'............
 
I don't think we'll see the 3G model until at least April 18, and most likely not until the end of April, as Apple has stated. Why? Because there will be a LOT of Wi-Fi-only models going to back to Apple for exchange if Apple doesn't get outside the 14-day return policy window. I know I'd gladly pay the $50-$60 restocking fee to 1) use the iPad with only Wi-Fi for a week or two and 2) instantly upgrade to the 3G.*

*instead of waiting until later this summer as I'd planned from the beginning...

We'll gladly take your returns and sell them as refurbs.

-Steve

Sent from my iPad
 
It's simple. By charging people within March, they can recognize the revenue for the quarter. That way, they can talk it up during the earnings call.

Remembering that it did cost Apple some money to manufacture these things this quarter, it would be bad business (from a shareholder perspective) not to recoup any of it within this quarter.
 
a lot of people have online savings accounts like ING Direct and don't keep a lot of cash in checking accounts. Transfers back from ING to another bank can take a few business days.

+1. People, this isn't the time nor place to verbally "one-up"/belittle others regarding their financial arrangements to cover iPad expenses or boast about being APPL shareholders, etc. There are plenty of members here that are more than solvent and are shareholders alike that don't see a need to broadcast this sort of information to the rest of the forum. In the end, we all get to experience/enjoy great products provided by Apple, no?
 
Well, no, of course they can. It's just their general policy to charge at time of shipment. They could easily complete the charge at time of order if they wanted to (as many retailers do). They could also charge after delivery, although that would be stupid.

Also not true. Any merchant can submit a new authorization so long as the order remains outstanding and unpaid. Settlement can occur after an initial hold falls off without any additional action required on the part of the buyer. When you purchase from, say, Amazon, and shipping is delayed, there is no need to resubmit the order after the 3-day hold falls off.

It is only improper to submit a settlement based on an expired hold. Sending a new authorization along with the demand for settlement at the same time solves this problem.

The dispute process involves no such high threshold. The evidentiary burden of proof required is simple preponderance (i.e., which side has the more credible evidence). Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is reserved for (a) actual court cases, not administrative dispute settlement and (b) criminal charges. A chargeback is neither.

I think you meant to insert an "It does not." between those two sentences. It is a misconception that the hold activity necessarily means they will be shipping this week.

1. They are not Apple's policies. They are the Merchant Service Provider policies. Charging after delivery is a widely used process in different industries.

2-3. That was true years ago. Rules and regulations now prevent the vendor from holding certain data from the original transaction. Unless the vendor (in this case a computer retailer, where they highest credit card fraud is taking place) wants to take on more exposure from fraud they will not resubmit a ticket without consent or written contract to do so. That may or may not be the retailer's policy. Either way they are strongly encouraged by the Merchant Service Provider to NOT do just that.

4. Nice use of legal jargon, and no attack upon you personally, but yes it is. The process is burdensome for the vendor and requires the same proof that a court of law requires, especially with electronic/internet transactions. Fact is, people commit fraud more often than most think. Some vendors have loss prevention teams dedicated to this. Others do not. Either way the vendor and ultimately every customer pays.

5. As for the second to last assumption that a few people have gotten hung up on. This pre-authorization is not a good measure for determining if the iPad will ship early. It may or may not.
 
I am glad there are monkeys that will buy revision A of this thing. With Apple's track record, I will wait for revision B.
 
It's simple. By charging people within March, they can recognize the revenue for the quarter. That way, they can talk it up during the earnings call.

Remembering that it did cost Apple some money to manufacture these things this quarter, it would be bad business (from a shareholder perspective) not to recoup any of it within this quarter.


They are preauthorizations/holds, not charges to card. The card isn't actually charged until it ships. Aapl's quarter ends 3/27 so I seriously doubt any sales will be included in this quarter.
 
Meh, I don't feel any more excited with my shareholder hat on. Maybe I'm not wearing it right.
__________________
iPod 3rd, Nano 1st & 3rd, Touch 2nd & 3rd, iPhone 2G & 3G, MBP 2K9
Never mind, I don't support patent abuse & hyper sensitive censorship.

Go go hypocrisy! You're a shareholder but you don't support Apple's policies so much so that you're willing to put it in your sig? Guess what, you literally DO support those things.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.