I wonder about how big the box will be
Could still be an aspirational product. The point is...a very high quality, differentiated small vehicle instead of yet another oversized SUV. Price per pound of car might still be quite high. The point is...less pounds of car.If Apple, that will be an electric bicycle, skateboard or perhaps just one skate... and probably still be a stretch for that household to buy 2 of them, even on 12-24 months at 0%.
Apple can't make "inexpensive." For that, you look to Asian companies. Even an Apple handkerchief (a piece of cloth) rolled out at $20.
Apple makes great stuff... and buyers pay a great premium for them. "A" is not for Affordable.
I wonder about how big the box will be
Will also run twice as fast with half the battery.In all likelihood, the wiper blades and cabin filters will need to be replaced with genuine Apple replacement parts. Otherwise, error messages abound.
You know, because otherwise, there could be "security" issues with third-party parts.
My interest level in a self-driving car: ZERO. Cars are meant to be driven. If I don't want to drive I can call an Uber, Lyft or taxi or get someone else to drive. If I have to choose between having a Porsche and owning a self-driving vehicle my choice is already done.
It absolutely won’t. They have been claiming that since they first began. They are nowhere near it. If anything Tesla will slide, with manufacturers making electric cars now, as well as more affordable ones to come to market in the next few years.lmao by then, Tesla will have put most legacy automakers in dire straits and have full self driving solved
im sure apple will totally eat Tesla's lunch, except for the fact that every apple car sold will earn Tesla profits from superchargers 🤣
Not true at all. Tesla's latest FSD Beta V12 is the path to cracking general self-driving. It's astounding.Turns out that despite the amount of money you throw at it, autonomous driving is just a really, really difficult egg to crack. Like honestly even the best systems we can field today are barely any better than the projects DARPA was reviewing back in, what, 2004? The computers and sensors are small enough to be hidden away in a passenger car now, I guess. So that's progress.
My interest level in a self-driving car: ZERO. Cars are meant to be driven. If I don't want to drive I can call an Uber, Lyft or taxi or get someone else to drive. If I have to choose between having a Porsche and owning a self-driving vehicle my choice is already done.
Tesla will solve it first. In EVs, Tesla will extend their lead. The OEMs are struggling to get close to profitability in EVs while Tesla enjoys massive margins.It absolutely won’t. They have been claiming that since they first began. They are nowhere near it. If anything Tesla will slide, with manufacturers making electric cars now, as well as more affordable ones to come to market in the next few years.
Will be a failure like Vision Pro.
Yep, automakers don't want to under Apple's totalitarian dictates.
Yeah, sure. Tesla owns that space, and has for more than a decade. Apple may want a piece of that pie, but it's going to be hard to get it because Tesla operates with the same intensity and urgency that Apple use to demonstrate under Jobs, which was not coincidently the last time Apple was churning out Tesla-like, world-changing tech.
It's going to take a complete fundamental shift from top to bottom before Apple realizes anything even remotely close to something as ambitious as self-driving automobiles.
Yeah, sure. Tesla owns that space, and has for more than a decade. Apple may want a piece of that pie, but it's going to be hard to get it because Tesla operates with the same intensity and urgency that Apple use to demonstrate under Jobs, which was not coincidently the last time Apple was churning out Tesla-like, world-changing tech.
It's going to take a complete fundamental shift from top to bottom before Apple realizes anything even remotely close to something as ambitious as self-driving automobiles.
I'm well aware of the progress Tesla has made. Their main contribution to the space is speed and packaging. They've got a much more compact system working at about double the maximum speeds that were reliable ten years ago. Part of that is their optimizations, part of that is the general forward march of technology. Back in the DARPA days you had to have a server rack to process the same amount of information you can run through an iPad these days.Not true at all. Tesla's latest FSD Beta V12 is the path to cracking general self-driving. It's astounding.
The problem with hydrogen is its poor energy efficiency. Also, the distribution infrastructure is complex and costly. It is difficult to see what could happen to make hydrogen better than batteries in small vehicles.If Apple wants to disrupt, they should perfect the Hydrogen Fuel Cell model, not electric.
I'll balance you out. My interest in a self-driving car is 100%.My interest level in a self-driving car: ZERO.
I think of them as the Apple of vehicles. All about vertical integration and owning the whole experience.Teslas are the vehicle equivalent of owning an Android, but no doubt they've got a massive first-mover advantage on the charging network though which I personally view as the real profit driver for the future of that company.
Plus, our traffic infrastructure is not ready for fully autonomous vehicles.I'm well aware of the progress Tesla has made. Their main contribution to the space is speed and packaging. They've got a much more compact system working at about double the maximum speeds that were reliable ten years ago. Part of that is their optimizations, part of that is the general forward march of technology. Back in the DARPA days you had to have a server rack to process the same amount of information you can run through an iPad these days.
But speaking from the perspective of someone who has worked in vehicle autonomy (and had self-driving cars try to do me in more than once) the chasm between very advanced driver assist features like what Tesla calls FSD and actual autonomous vehicles is far wider than you're giving it credit for.
Like, don't get me wrong, humans are good problem solvers, and we'll get there eventually. But not in the near future.
It is sort of ironic that currently one of the most common and widely distributed locations were hydrogen gas is readily available is from oil refineries that produce gasoline. Hydrogen gas is currently a waste product of the current gasoline refinement processThe problem with hydrogen is its poor energy efficiency. Also, the distribution infrastructure is complex and costly. It is difficult to see what could happen to make hydrogen better than batteries in small vehicles.
My interest in a self driving car is very high. I would gain maybe ten hours a week. That is equivalent to about 6 % longer life expectancy.My interest level in a self-driving car: ZERO. Cars are meant to be driven. If I don't want to drive I can call an Uber, Lyft or taxi or get someone else to drive. If I have to choose between having a Porsche and owning a self-driving vehicle my choice is already done.