Oh god no, carOS 2 killed my cars performance. It's so slow now!! Shifting is all jerky and I can't get over 50 mph without the road stuttering. You really screwed this up Apple!!
Last edited:
Carplay is still relatively new. They just started building it into new cars last year. People don't buy a new car every year to get better support for their iPhones. I think you need to be a bit more patient on this one...
Carplay is still relatively new. They just started building it into new cars last year. People don't buy a new car every year to get better support for their iPhones. I think you need to be a bit more patient on this one...
Carplay is still relatively new. They just started building it into new cars last year. People don't buy a new car every year to get better support for their iPhones. I think you need to be a bit more patient on this one...
What is Apple making right now outside of computers? It's not like we have Apple dishwashers and refrigerators. And the car is going to become the ultimate computer, no?
The i3 is a roughly $50k car. You're delusional if you think today's $35k Honda Accord will get less expensive over time.
With that being said, the price isn't the problem. BMW i3 suffers on their target range not meeting reality. When Apple steps in they better match what they claim or will face a wrath of negativity traditional auto corps never face.
2019 just means either models released in Sept 2018 and thus finalized by Sept 2017 or we don't see this until Sept 2020. We're near 2016, so Apple better have some big improvements in battery tech soon or the car will be nothing more than a glorified grocery store cruiser.
Porsche's 911 replacement just revealed leap frogs Tesla and its battery range is far superior.
http://www.porsche.com/international/aboutporsche/pressreleases/?pool=international-de&id=360138
Over a 500km driving range on a single charge. That should be Apple's target in range.
Touche.adding a car isn't exactly making everything. I mean look at Samsung, now they make everything. Chips, ram, SSDs, toasters, fridges, washers and dryers, cameras, phones, tablets, tavs blu ray players, home theater etc etc etc etc. They seem to be doing alright with it
Because Samsung already did cars...Because Samsung has a car...
Well, maybe in 2020.
They actually do:Because Samsung has a car...
Well, maybe in 2020.
Sony never made 'everything' such as household appliances. Sony was all but killed by Samsung's copying and then 'dumping' tactics of the last ten or so years ago. Sony's top-of-the-line TVs are still amongst the best on the market.Even so, how many companies have found success by making everything. It's worked so well for Sony.
Coal is virtually dead in America so this isnt accurate. Whatever was left has been rapidly converting to natural gas plants thanks to regulation. And locally produced natural gas is intrinsically better in all ways. Environmental and otherwise. The new more dramatic clean air regs that are going into effect ahortly will put the final kaibash on coal.when will they start factoring in coal plants as emissions, since they need to be charged? sorry for your feel good but electric cars have more of a "carbon footprint" than the gasoline engine. i guess we'll know when it isnt politically advantageous anymore...
If you see samung video on you tube they make everything so yea samsung have several car plants.Because Samsung has a car...
Well, maybe in 2020.
I like Apple products because they always try to make it more usable than before, but what can they add to a car?
Because Samsung has a car...
Well, maybe in 2020.
Has to be cheaper than a Tesla.
Didnt Mickey Drexler say Steve wanted to do a car? Who knows how serious he was but Apple is a company with $200B+ billion in revenues now. It will be pretty tough to continue grow that revenue base without branching outside of their current product line. Last year Tim Cook said iPhone would be Apple's main revenue driver for the next 5 years. Apple car is basically thinking what comes after iPhone. Perhaps Apple should be doing VR headsets and robots instead. But neither of those seem in their wheelhouse either.Not to mention Apple of the 1990s was a blip on the radar in corporate worth, influence and financial stability, let alone talent and vision moving forward.
Steve most certainly would have moved Apple into making this project a reality.
when will they start factoring in coal plants as emissions, since they need to be charged? sorry for your feel good but electric cars have more of a "carbon footprint" than the gasoline engine. i guess we'll know when it isnt politically advantageous anymore...
Not this old trope again!Only 39% of the electricity generated in the US is from coal and that number is going down.
Energy production is more efficient in a power plant than it is in a car engine. To use an example with an identical source fuel, burning natural gas in a power plant is about 60% efficient, meaning 40% of the energy of the fuel is lost in the energy production process. In a car, burning gas is less than 25% efficient, with the vast majority of the energy lost to heat. The larger more complex system at a power plant will always be far better at capturing waste heat than a tiny car engine. The increased efficiency means that even a car running purely on coal-generated electricity will emit carbon at the same rate as a gas car that gets 30 miles per gallon—which would be a significantly cleaner-than-average gas car.
Link for the full details.
BTW let me know when you can run a gas car on solar power!
You think you're funny but yes they did, my wife had one when she lived in Korea. Bigger and nicer than a Carmy she says.Because Samsung has a car...
Well, maybe in 2020.