Costs coming down is inevitable. That's how technology works. I wouldn't take your side of the bet on this one. This is where we're headed.
Costs only went up with iPhone and iPad Pro.
Costs coming down is inevitable. That's how technology works. I wouldn't take your side of the bet on this one. This is where we're headed.
And I might try it then, if it's become useful too.Maybe these are actually the Apple glasses, just in the bulky, expensive, early prototype form, and 20 years from now the Apple Vision Pro will just be a pair of 500 dollar ray bans.
Apple should make a cheaper Vision model without personalization and allowing to wear prescription glasses (no need for inserts) just to watch 3D movies. Just for that. That is what most people want.
They said that about the first iPhone.
To be fair they said the same thing about the iPhone, but I get your point. I think it's a slow adoption strategy. The issue I have with it is that it's so inhuman and isolating, which is very un-apple. I would never wear this unless I was by myself. I guess that's what happens when your only emotional relationships are with a machine, like Tim
That's something I'm looking forward to. It's possible, but it's going to be quite some time before you can embed it in a a consumer device.We'll eventually get to lenses that dynamically adjust focus.
If this is so annoying to you, there are two other options:Yeah, the having to pay a fee (of who knows how much) just because I have a prescription is so annoying. I'm sure it will also be non refundable. And when your vision changes (as it does when you get older) you'll need brand new inserts. I'll be hoping they do this via software in Goggles 2.0.
I fully agree here. People keep dropping this as if it’s a simple concept that is a mere years away as if AR tracking isn’t one of the most computationally intensive things a computer can do right now, all having to run on a motherboard that never gets hot to the touch and with tiny batteries to fit in a comfortable pair of glasses… Pure science fiction for a long while.I think we are a long way from AR glasses that are good enough to more useful/convenient than a smartwatch while simultaneously being close enough to the form factor of traditional glasses that people will be willing to wear them all day.
To be fair they really didn’t say that. They took one look and their stomach dropped. Google dropped whatever blackberry like device they were doing. Back to the drawing board. I mean it’s like some of you are rewriting history. Or weren’t there for the first iPhone event.
You bought a Mac lately? Costs aren't coming down for that market.
That's for sure. But unfortunately not on the first generation.The Apple Vision Pro is definitely getting upgraded to an M3 chip with Ray Tracing.
Sure. But that's only true for the first gen. I'm sure the price will go down in future generations, or they'll launch a new cheaper headset and keep the high price for future Pro versions.Just too expensive for it to be widely accepted.
Unfortunately I can't do either. Would if I could. Medical reasons, not by my choice.If this is so annoying to you, there are two other options:
-wear contacts
-get laser eye surgery
Tim probably is using iPhone 21 and MacBook Pro 2027 now, just take some prototypes from the labyou really think he pays for it?????
The necessary technology for that doesn’t exist though, and I don’t expect it will for at least the next decade or so.I think regular glasses with a HUD will be the next great thing. Powered by the phone, or even a watch (in a pinch). Intelligent, that anticipates stuff.
Cheap, comfortable, useful. I'd line up now.
Tim's life must be so boring if a VR/AR device, even if a superior one, constitutes a few-in-a-lifetime aha moment.
Or perhaps he is making a gross exaggeration.
I’m sure Apple will make Spacemojis or something.But… But, what about the emojis?
The necessary technology for that doesn’t exist though, and I don’t expect it will for at least the next decade or so.