Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I’ve been using Google services for a while and only recently tiptoed into Android. The AI integration feels fluid and natural, not tacked on like a standalone LLM. That said, Gemini in my experience is rough for editing as it turns everything into a Hallmark nursery rhyme. Hopefully Apple can shape Gemini into something that integrates cleanly with iOS, but the calendar is working against them. By the time Apple gets there, Google may already be well ahead, especially if it puts more into Pixel hardware and narrows the build quality gap.
 
Last edited:
Everyone I know who has an Android phone has been complaining about how Gemini doesn't work reliably. It might work for a particular command today, but then totally botch the same exact command next week. It's unstable garbage.

Why is Apple doing this? Do people really want this?
I would tend to agree about the instability for commands. Heck, Google's own non-LLM seemed to work better for requests of Apple Music on my Home Hub. Guess we'll see how it turns out.
 


In a statement shared with CNBC today, Apple confirmed that Google Gemini will power the next-generation version of Siri that is slated to launch later this year.

iOS-18-Siri-Personal-Context.jpg

"After careful evaluation, we determined that Google's technology provides the most capable foundation for Apple Foundation Models and we're excited about the innovative new experiences it will unlock for our users," the statement said.

The report explicitly mentioned that Google Gemini will power Siri, as was expected. Apple's decision to lean on Google's artificial intelligence technology should result in the revamped Siri being more capable and advanced than it otherwise would have been, as Gemini's large language model is significantly larger than Apple's own model.

The next-generation version of Siri is expected to be introduced with iOS 26.4, which will likely be released to the general public in March or April.

Apple first announced the personalized Siri features during its WWDC 2024 keynote, but last year it announced that they were delayed. The new capabilities will include better understanding of a user's personal context, on-screen awareness, and deeper per-app controls. For example, Apple showed an iPhone user asking Siri about their mother's flight and lunch reservation plans based on info from the Mail and Messages apps.

Article Link: Apple Confirms Google Gemini Will Power Next-Generation Siri This Year

Apple had mentioned that they were working on something, but it required time. What changed? Why can’t they produce the technology themselves? Why did they fail?
 
iOS had Google Maps and YouTube installed by default for the first 5 years I don’t see how this is any different.
And Yahoo Weather with a skin. Apple will use other people's work for years while working on their own and switch it out to an in-house solution when it works 90% as good as what they are paying others to do. This is just going to be gen 1 of LLM Siri. We may be waiting another 3+ years for Apple to come up with something as good for gen 2. And I expect a string of acquisitions and talent hires to be done between now and then.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sergio The One
As long as I can keep it 100% disabled, idgaf
You will be able to keep it 100% disabled as long as there is an alternative.
My guess is within 1 - 2 years there will be zero alternative. All these "assistants" will be AI-based, all search engines will be AI-based etc.
 
Alex, I'll take "Headlines one never would have read under Steve Jobs" for $2 Trillion.
Steve Jobs gave us Internet Explorer as the built-in web browser on Macs for a few years.

But it does seems concerning that this looks like Google is going to be the default AI on ~100% of mobile devices.

This seems like a case where anti-trust regulators should step in and say that Google, as the owner of Android, isn't allowed to provide any defaults for iOS, and Apple, as the owner of iOS, isn't allowed to provide any defaults for Android.

I'm fine with it being handled the way browsers are in the EU - when the device is setup, have the user explicitly pick whichever one they want pre-installed.

And this is particularly horrible for iOS where I'm guessing the AI isn't even the default so much as there just isn't an option, period.
 
Pathetic. I imagine Google is paying apple for this too?
No, no, no, that’s the best part: YOU are going to pay for it. So they’ll get both the data and the money. I bet there will be several Siri+ tiers to choose from. As they showed today, their services are growing, so obviously they want to push and accelerate this development even more, because money.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.