Of course Google’s model is bigger when you basically have unlimited access to people’s and internet sites data. It needs to be investigated how their models were trained.
What Apple had was either non-existent and/or terrible.So is this a stop gap or did they abandon their own LLM?
Along with access to your cameras and microphone.Just when you thought Google Gemini consuming all your Gmail's was bad, now Apple is gonna let it run rampant on your phone?
I’m surprised so many people think this means that Siri is just going to be Gemini Under Another Name and that all the info we give to Siri will now be going to Google.
From everything I've seen, it looks like it's just going to be using Google's LLMs for Siri instead of Apple's own, which would be like using the OED instead of Merriam-Webster. There's no reason to think that Google is going to be doing any of the processing of any of the data; they're just going to be providing the LLM on which the system is built. Why would anyone think that Apple is going to be abandoning Private Cloud Compute and all that and just handing all processing over to Google?
They already have your data.Well, let's hope no data goes to Google. If so, it's a no from me.
Apple has said a lot of things about Siri in the last couple of years. I hope they haven't given up on the this important part of their privacy strategy.it's already been said these models will be on device and on Apple's own private cloud compute
I think that's fair, but that's a much more reasonable response than "I'm now going to be removing Siri from all my devices because I don't want Google having my info" when there's no reason to think that's happening. This all points to Apple just using Googles models instead of their own to interpret commands; there's not been any reporting that the processing of those commands will now be done on Google's servers instead of Apple's.To be candid, I think many of us just "don't know" in enough detail what is going on and "how" with a lot of this tech, myself included.
I hope privacy will be fully protected, but I always worry when Google, Meta and Amazon (and some others) get involved in literally anything, as we all know their real business angle is always about privacy invasion and data usage.
I think that's fair, but that's a much more reasonable response than "I'm now going to be removing Siri from all my devices because I don't want Google having my info" when there's no reason to think that's happening. This all points to Apple just using Googles models instead of their own to interpret commands; there's not been any reporting that the processing of those commands will now be done on Google's servers instead of Apple's.
I, too, stay away from Meta/Google/Amazon like the plague, but I don't find it suspect that they'd let apple use their models to get a billion dollar per year discount on being the default search engine (again, according to reporting).
So is this a stop gap or did they abandon their own LLM?
You were literally using a phone that had Google as a default search engine. You knew what you were getting into buying an iPhone, it's weird to complain about it now.I don't like this at all. Google is a tracking hound, and Apple should know better.
Alex, I'll take "Headlines one never would have read under Steve Jobs" for $2 Trillion.
If no useful data is going to (presumably Apple's) Gemini servers, then how is Gemini going to be trained?Apple is requiring Google to use Apple’s Private Cloud Compute framework, where any data sent to the server is pre-processed on-device and the server can never see the actual user data.
Gemini is already being trained without data from Apple.If no useful data is going to (presumably Apple's) Gemini servers, then how is Gemini going to be trained?
Hi @CyberGene , I’ve also been like you, I just don’t trust Google, but many people around swear that Gemini is a better model than ChatGPT.By the way, I’ve been avoiding anything Google for years now, as many others have. However, we started using Gemini at work, and I was so impressed with it that I just said “f*ck it, I need this on my personal iPhone too!”. I’ve been using it for a month now, subscribed to the lowest-priced tier, and I’m extremely happy with it. I’m glad Apple made the decision to use it; it’s the right choice.
The answer to the money part is pretty easy - Apple basically turned around and gave most of that cash to Power Computing in order to cancel their Mac OS Clone license early.
I 100% guarantee that you will still be using an iPhone 12 months from nowThe Day that Apple collaborates with Google is the day I'm finished with Apple......and I'm ridiculously within the Apple ecosystem and have been nearly since its inception, certainly since the Smart Phone in 2007. Privacy is everything to me and I have managed to avoid anything and everything Google over the years. I feel very betrayed by Apple and the "Privacy" policy that Tim Cook has repeatedly sworn will exist in Apple products. It isn't perfect, but at least it wasn't sharing your information, data, or selling your browsing and phone call history.