Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I think so too...the bigger screen was really the only thing that the iPhone was missing all these years.

Couple that with apple pay, which will (not may) change how people pay for things and I can see apple getting a lot of business from android users.


I don't get why they didn't keep a 4 inches version around. I don't want a phone that big :/ I just want a small phone like the iphone 4 and iPhone 5. They should've released the 4 inches, 4.7 and 5.5 to please everyone.
 
I don't get why they didn't keep a 4 inches version around. I don't want a phone that big :/ I just want a small phone like the iphone 4 and iPhone 5. They should've released the 4 inches, 4.7 and 5.5 to please everyone.

They don't need to release 4" version they have it with iPhone 5/c/s and at a lower cost because it is older model.

----------

1.2 B smartphones were sold in 2013, so 4 M iPhone 6's in one day represents somewhere around 0.33% of all the smartphones likely to be sold in 2014. If Apple were able to maintain that every day for 301 days, they'd end up selling every phone in the world for that year.

Not going to happen. IF it did Apple stock would be insane. $5000? Imagine..going from target of 70-80m sold to 1.2b sold. Holy cow.
 
Yeah, but Android ships a billion units a month. :D

Well, actually....
As of July 29th, 2014 there have been 1.1 billion phones sold worldwide over a period of 7 years (that's 84 months, if my math is better than yours) that run the Android operating system.... soooooooo sorry about your unsuccessful trolling attempt.
 
Well, actually....
As of July 29th, 2014 there have been 1.1 billion phones sold worldwide over a period of 7 years (that's 84 months, if my math is better than yours) that run the Android operating system.... soooooooo sorry about your unsuccessful trolling attempt.

He was kidding.
 
Ah cognitive dissonance. The bleh way they use our parts is wrong, but their bleh usage makes us money so it's good.

Let's be honest, Samsung is not giving each other high fives when the iPhone outsells their phones. Making such a statement is laughable. But it appears that that's what we're running with in this thread.

Making the statement that Samsung's ad was saying their own parts were blah was comical.
 
They know what they need to do. 4 million in 5 minutes for iPhone 7. Maybe they can switch things up a big and give us a BIG Upgrade next year too.

All they got to do is add more countries on pre-order dates and release dates then the number will go up. This is the pattern they have since the beginning just to up the orders on first day. So when they release the numbers to the media it sounds like they beat the numbers every year. That's pretty much it!
 
The poster said each bezel was 1 ton or 2000 pounds not the raw materials that it takes to produce the bezel. Additionally there is no way that it takes 2000 pounds or 32,000 ounces of silicate to produce a single bezel that is less than an ounce in weight.

You must have failed either Science or Satire... perhaps both? :D
 
Your account/post history reeks of anti-apple. Are you a fanboy or did the competition have to resort to sleazy practices by hiring contractors to post in our forum.

Either way, this is a Apple forum, why are you here? Why are you so worked up over Apple that you have to come here to 'divert' people from Apple products.

It doesn't matter though, I already gave Apple my money and so have many others. We already won.

Checked his posts. You're right in the mark. He hasn't said a SINGLE thing in favour of a single IOS product. Nada. Either he thinks this is a weirdly-named general tech site or he really is just a an android-user trying to spit in our faces.
 
I think the numbers are a little off;
a) By the people who ordered 6 and 6+ who will return one of the phones (the phone that feels less comfortable in their hand).
b) The people who will turn up on launch day (or later) buy a phone and then cancel their pre order (me).

I am pretty sure that number is less than a fraction of a percent. So small as to be insignificant.
 
All they got to do is add more countries on pre-order dates and release dates then the number will go up. This is the pattern they have since the beginning just to up the orders on first day. So when they release the numbers to the media it sounds like they beat the numbers every year. That's pretty much it!

Accept this year there is no China in the mix where iPhone 6 Plus sales would be the highest as big phones are in demand there.
 
Found this putting things into perspective:

BxlYi5LIUAEt6l5.png


Source.
 
Well I guess this disproves the posters that claimed no one wanted larger screened iPhones.

Honestly there are so many people on Macrumors that just think they know it all.

Before Iphone plus was announced, so many people were mocking the rumours that a 5.5 inch phone will be released, saying "no one wants a bigger phone" or "There are lack of leaked images for 5.5 to be real" etc etc.

It just goes to show that a lot of people talk about stuff they really have no clue about.
 
There is a big difference between people accessing a site and people making transactions. All those transactions are more likely why the sites were having trouble.[\QUOTE]

I guess customers only access a site none made purchases? I said simultaneous customers not people browsing websites.

----------

Found this putting things into perspective:

Image

Source.

Its obvious Apple is constraining the number of phones to sell to generate hyper demand to keep breaking these one day sales records..... oh wait....

----------


But that was HTC... I'm sure they don't do the same thing with Apple. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
*snip*
It's well known that Apple simply did this to add a bulletpoint for their devices. Having a 64-bit processor with 1GB of ram is next to useless.

When was the last time Apple did something simply to add a bullet point to its feature list???? That's not the way they do things. That's the way everyone else does things.

It isn't about the feature list, it is about the user experience and the implementation. NFC is a prime example. Screen resolution is another. The camera is another. TouchID. Apple could have put a Quad HD screen on both of the phones, but they didn't. They increased the quality of the screen instead of throwing pixels at it. Their implementation of NFC payments is such a better experience, both in terms of security and convenience, and their timing and forethought is exceptional. Android phones will have :apple:Pay to thank for the NFC feature becoming actually useful. The camera is always rated right at the top of independent 3rd party reviews every year, despite not being a bajillion megapixels.

The list goes on. There is a reason Apple went 64bit, and I'm sure we'll all find out why soon enough, and it isn't just to add a bullet point to the feature list.
 
No, you are missing the point. Apple didn't switch to ARM v7 simply to add a bullet point. It let them double the performance of the A7 vs the A6 without doubling the cores or the clock speeds. That avoids heat issues. They refined it even further with the A8. ARM developed v7 specifically in anticipation of the move to 64-bit, which they thought would start with servers, not phones. It would have been pointless for Apple to create a 32-bit version of ARM v7 since they would eventually have needed to move to 64-bit.

If all you are worried about is memory addressing, you can add registers to a 32-bit processor. Heck, Intel did that back in the 16-bit days (which is why the 8086 and 80286 could access 1MB of RAM even though 2^16 is only 64KB). They just didn't do that with their 32-bit chips, which is how this whole myth that 64-bit is useful only with more than 4GB of RAM got started.

Yes, thank you. People that claim that 64-bit processors are only good for accessing more RAM are people that aren't programmers and don't really understand addressing very well.

----------

So what your saying is 4" isn't the perfect size for a phone. About time senses have been come to. Holding out for the 6.5" iphone ++.

4" or less is still the best size for a phone if you want to use it with one hand.

I personally think Apple should've done a 4" iPhone 6 and a 5.5" iPhone 6+. Then you've got one handset for people that want something that fits in their pocket and they can use in one hand, and one for people that are going all in and will use it two-handed anyway.
 
Obviously, the larger size has everything to do with this unprecedented amount of pre-orders. I wouldn't be surprised if these two iPhone 6 models end up selling more units than the 4S, 5, 5S and 5C have so far, combined.

The iPhone6 models will at the very least outsell the last three of the above line-up.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.