Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well Cook has smarten up a little bit of not disclosing an amount just like he did the last time which is sound like a regular person donating a penny to a calamity and bragging it.
This is a nonsense take.

Money doesn't work that way. $1M is still $1M or whatever the amount. Apple doesn't have to do anything except increase value for shareholders. Shareholders own the company. Apple isn't a person.
 
I assume this is a tax write off for Apple? Look for the next product to be bumped up another $50 to cover their charity.
 
Hey Tim... it isn't your money to donate... it's the shareholders money. Whether I agree or disagree with the donation is not the point.. it's a matter of corporate governance and his legal role as a fiduciary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: simonmet
Okay, I’m not usually cynical but this one’s got me.

I’ve visited Notre Dame. It’s incredible. Beautiful, historic and all of those other things which are being banded about.

Clearly some restoration work will need to be done but here’s where I have a problem... £500m has been raised in less than a day to fund its restoration. £500m. Regardless of the building’s beauty and importance, it’s still just a building. What could £500m do for healthcare research, or homelessness or any other worthy cause? But instead these huge companies manage to raise it to spend on something made of stone and wood - and somehow I find that quite distasteful.

That’s not how human emotion works. Great idea though... unless restoration will cost more than the amount they collect—which is absolutely a possibility, considering the “priceless artifacts” lost, etc.

As symbol of national and global identity, it is hard to quantify the value of Norte Dame, but if the Statue of Liberty were struck down, I’d rather see a strong showing of broad and overwhelming support, than to see a trickle of money stream in. Or ideas instead to divert the money (before anyone knows how much restoration will actually cost) to causes that absolutely no one will universally agree on.
[doublepost=1555431758][/doublepost]
Hey Tim... it isn't your money to donate... it's the shareholders money. Whether I agree or disagree with the donation is not the point.. it's a matter of corporate governance and his legal role as a fiduciary.

You really think Apple doesn’t have a relatively huge line in their budget for donations/outreach/PR? A ~trillion dollar company and you’re worried about share price being diluted by .000001¢ per share?
 
I will also donate.

Not because of Apple, but because Notre Dame is incredibly beautiful and inspiring. It is a testament to the beauty mankind can accomplish and I want my children to see those rose windows and know that their great grandparents stood in the same spot and marveled at the same beauty that ties generations.
They will indeed marvel at the same beauty as the rose windows were fortunatelly saved. :)
It is a supreme historical site of the world. At least Google it. It was built in 1163. No building has lasted that long besides the pyramids and who knows which other. Is from the medieval times and

When the Challenger and Columbia exploded the world was shocked and sad, this building burning... everybody in the world loses something forever.

Just do a research on the organ inside.... your jaw will fall off. Then you have the Crown of Thorns of Jesus.

You should really spend some time realizing what are the actual important things in the world... any is related to social media btw.
Even my home town is filled with stuff older than Notre Dame. Our own Catedral is slightly older, as it started in 1147
Not as nice as Notre Dame but still quite nice. Like Notre Dame it is owned by the state (as it should, the state had it comissioned and payed it).

442f1b88-f704-ed49-f6ed-07d1487a1bd7
 
Last edited:
Don't you worry, it follows right behind your comment
This is MacRumors community after all. Negativity is in it's DNA.


It's not in the DNA; it's in the psyche.

Psyche: the human soul, spirit, or mind; the mental or psychological structure of a person, especially as a motive force.

Think about what must be going on with their psyche to motivate someone to go to a place where fans/enthusiasts gather about a topic/subject that they enjoy, and spending your time constantly throwing out negative comments/trolling. It's the equivalent of going to a convention for enthusiasts of some subject and yelling out negative comments at every display or presentation; calling everyone "sheeple," etc.
 
Last edited:
Hey Tim... it isn't your money to donate... it's the shareholders money. Whether I agree or disagree with the donation is not the point.. it's a matter of corporate governance and his legal role as a fiduciary.
That’s what they told Ford when he paid his employees enough to buy his cars.
 
I'm not saying that at all. I agree it transcends any individual group, but "hope" simply aint the word I would use. Genuinely too afraid to use a three letter word in this thread... and it isnt art.

In my view- a House of Art and a House of Hope just doesnt have the same ring or significance to it.

Oh... God? Yeah, you’re right, he probably could’ve referenced God in there and have not have ruffled many feathers. That might have been good to include along with “hope,” something for both...although it was/is a house of worship, for crying out loud. (But that’s just my own perspective, I’m not even religious, please don’t attack me...) :D
 
Oh... God? Yeah, you’re right, he probably could’ve referenced God in there and have not have ruffled many feathers. That might have been good to include along with “hope,” something for both...although it was/is a house of worship, for crying out loud. (But that’s just my own perspective, I’m not even religious, please don’t attack me...) :D

It has nothing to do with one's perspective or personal religion though I appreciate you including that you don't have "skin in the game" to even further emphasize the point, I think it is an obvious statement of fact that it's a place of worship even as per the definition. True some go to admire the beautiful art/architecture, and there is indeed absolutely nothing wrong with that (thats what I did when I visited Paris), but it is by the end of the day a Cathedral not MoMA.

It is categorically incorrect to say its just a place of architecture or art or... hope.

The same would go with any synagogue, church, mosque, etc etc.

upload_2019-4-16_12-37-22.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
I have no idea why so many seem surprised that the cathedral had a lead roof.

It was been a common roofing material for at least 2,000 years… In the Great Fire of London 1666, when the original St Paul's burnt down, rivers of lead ran down the streets as the whole structure went up in flames.

Lately churches are targeted by thieves who steal the lead… leaving the building open to the elements.

Read here: Protecting your roof from theft
 
  • Like
Reactions: tooloud10
Absolutely NOT. Where did you get all this nonesense from? French churches belong to the GOVERNMENT? I guess you meant state. Still very wrong. Please check your facts before commenting.

French churches are owned by the French government and funding depends solely on how charitable the government feels like. Before the fire it has been living with just 2 million euros each year, it's a miracle that it is still standing given how pathetically little amount of maintenance it has been receiving.

I'd also argue since the day of iTunes store's launch, artistic stewardship became an untold focus of Apple, and Jony Ive's near-insanity obsession with form confirms just that. Apple has been convincing the world it embodies art, and when a crisis situation like this one hits, making a statement is in Apple's interest.

Also don't forget the Notre Dame remains an engineering marvel. Apple products are engineering marvels. They go hand in hand.
 
The ignorance is strong on this one. It's owned by the French ministry of Culture. And for your information, it's also a UNESCO world heritage site, so this is equivalent to the Colosseum being destroyed. Have some respect for such sites, it's a piece human history for all our future generations to learn from, it's got nothing to do with religion or money at this point.
If "Rocky Mountains" is the place he lives in, it would be very difficult to find something older than two centuries. How can he grab a "historic site" concept?
[doublepost=1555433356][/doublepost]
What a massively impressive building. The rebuilding/restoration will take a significant amount of time, fortunately the entire building was not a total loss. I wonder if they’ll ever be able to determine what caused the fire.
That is a kind of job that always fascinated me. Those guys examining a total disaster and determining "it started here", "it happened this" and so on
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
That’s what they told Ford when he paid his employees enough to buy his cars.
This is no different than Tim donating to political parties, his favorite charity, etc etc.... he's taking shareholder profits without asking. Paying salaries is a completely different issue. With the amount of profits Apple is generating, Apple should be paying the highest salaries in SV... it shouldn't even be close.
 
French churches are owned by the French government and funding depends solely on how charitable the government feels like. Before the fire it has been living with just 2 million euros each year, it's a miracle that it is still standing given how pathetically little amount of maintenance it has been receiving.

I'd also argue since the day of iTunes store's launch, artistic stewardship became an untold focus of Apple, and Jony Ive's near-insanity obsession with form confirms just that. Apple has been convincing the world it embodies art, and when a crisis situation like this one hits, making a statement is in Apple's interest.

Also don't forget the Notre Dame remains an engineering marvel. Apple products are engineering marvels. They go hand in hand.
APPLE ART???? Not since Steve left!! One look at the GUI mess in every OS Apple has now! Flat icons is art? Rainbowy transparent backgrounds is art? Apple- mind your business and bring back some of the genius that made Apple!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: riker1384
It is a supreme historical site of the world. At least Google it. It was built in 1163. No building has lasted that long besides the pyramids and who knows which other. Is from the medieval times and

When the Challenger and Columbia exploded the world was shocked and sad, this building burning... everybody in the world loses something forever.

Just do a research on the organ inside.... your jaw will fall off. Then you have the Crown of Thorns of Jesus.

You should really spend some time realizing what are the actual important things in the world... any is related to social media btw.

The current version was rebuilt in 1831

I suppose it depends on your definition of "building" but the Parthenon is about 2400 years old
 
Absolutely NOT. Where did you get all this nonesense from? French churches belong to the GOVERNMENT? I guess you meant state. Still very wrong. Please check your facts before commenting.

Notre Dame is owned by the state by law passed in 1905.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.