Got it, you are an entitled whiny crybaby.
Right, because I’m one of those crying, stomping my feet, and sitting down on the floor screaming “Noooo, I don’t wanna go back to the ho-wible office (sticks pacifier in their mouth)!”
Got it, you are an entitled whiny crybaby.
Yes, and your implication was that workers that were demanding that Apple allow them to WFH 100% of the time were more productive and highly skilled then the plebs that show up at the office three days a week.Do you know what it means to imply something? Your implication was that the people telling Apple they wanted to work from home were slackers and would make Apple a better company if they left.
Yep. for sure. I hear a trump rally calling your name.Right, because I’m one of those crying, stomping my feet, and sitting down on the floor screaming “Noooo, I don’t wanna go back to the ho-wible office (sticks pacifier in their mouth)”.
Yep. for sure. I hear a trump rally calling your name.
No it wasn't, I clearly stated that where one desires to work from has no bearing on whether they're a good, productive employee or not. A good employee can work at the office or at home just the same as a bad one. I'll quote it directly so that you can read it one more time and hopefully actually understand what was said.Yes, and your implication was that workers that were demanding that Apple allow them to WFH 100% of the time were more productive and highly skilled then the plebs that show up at the office three days a week.
Getting hired on at one of the most desirable tech companies to work for in the first place would have me believe that they’re probably largely quality employees. Wanting to work from home doesn’t make them slackers anymore than wanting to go into work magically makes someone a good employee.
Such simple minded thinking and assumptions.
Wow, reading your asinine comments, I was thinking the same.Such simple minded thinking and assumptions.
I imagine if you did a liberal/conservative head count, the majorioty of the right would be against the Apple employees, while the left would be for them working at home.
NOpe. and you don't know me, so there you go. Did your boat sink last fall? Who sounds like the crybaby now?Well he doesn’t know me.
NOpe. and you don't know me, so there you go.
However, reading what one says can be a fantastic indicator of said person and their beliefs. What I'm left wondering is whether Steve Adam's was indeed correct. Of course I'd never expect an honest answer to that question.Well he doesn’t know me.
However, reading what one says can be a fantastic indicator of said person and their beliefs. What I'm left wondering is whether Steve Adam's was indeed correct. Of course I'd never expect an honest answer to that question.
So funny. Again, I think the same thing. Nothing desperate here, I work from home. Get a great pay check, live an awesome life. My wife, the same. I pity you who needs to goto work every day...work for a boss who thinks your an ass and you jump at his every whim. Poor thing. Jealous of us who have a great life.The smell of the desperate fear I mentioned earlier is strong with this one….
The Fortune 500 won’t disappear anytime soon. Maybe small companies with non-flexible wfh ideas. But top talent can be replaced. Nobody is indispensable.If those companies want to stick around they’ll eventually have to move with the times. Offices are expensive to run and the top talent want to work from home and they also work better from home. Work from home isn’t going to go away now, especially not fo programmers where we have countless cases that show working from home is more efficient and if you want to squeeze even more productivity than just that, you can move to a four day work week.
Maybe, but 5 more years of Mr. Cook.He's in a rare 3rd catagory...called greedy power hungry CEO's. The forward thinking ceo, not the typical bean counter timmy is, see's the benifit of their employees being happy and comfortable at work. The CEO like timmy are in the dinosaur catagory. Workers MUST be at the office, under our thumbs to make sure they don't "slack off". So he's actually a mixture of 1 and 3.
Not for me, I jumped off the tim train. Enough of the same regurgitated products year in year out.Maybe, but 5 more years of Mr. Cook.
Not for me, I jumped off the tim train. Enough of the same regurgitated products year in year out.
I like the ALTERNATIVE sections here. They are active and engaging. thanks for asking...any more ways to try to "trip me up" with your cunning intellect? Phew dodged a couple of big ones here... 😅Really. Is that why you’re a regular reader/poster here on MacRumors?
It's almost as if they are jealous or something...I don't know....I can't put my finger on it.I can't undertstand why people we don't know (the Apple workers) who want to work at home at a company we don't work for (Apple), are against the workers trying to get a better deal. It just seems spiteful to be angry about this, when most of us have nothing to do with this either way.
It appears to be because if the Apple employees 'win' then the people who are angry about it somehow 'lose,' even though it literally doesn't effect them. I don't get the logic, but it seems there's now a sizable portion of the population who's logic nowadays is specious at best. I'm a chemist and would never be able to do my job from home every day of the week, but I certainly don't hold that against Apple employees who have zero to do with my own job.I can't undertstand why people we don't know (the Apple workers) who want to work at home at a company we don't work for (Apple), are against the workers trying to get a better deal. It just seems spiteful to be angry about this, when most of us have nothing to do with this either way.
Exactly. the us vs. them mentality in the US these past 5 to 6 years is so caustic to society. I work from my home property, I have a few businesses that I run and I am hands on in everything. From rebuilding engines in motorsports equipment to writing, photography and videography. I also have a tour business, a liquidation business and woodworking business. Now, I am not jealous of anyone else's job, I don't care what anyone does for work, or where they do it. It's literally none of mine, or anyone else's concern. I love just calling out the whiners here as they are so petty and juvenile. If I must work from a location, YOU HAVE TOO AS WELL. Jealousy at it's finest folks.It appears to be because if the Apple employees 'win', then the people who are angry about it somehow 'lose,' even though it literally doesn't effect them. I don't get the logic, but it seems there's now a sizable portion of the population who's logic nowadays is specious at best. I'm a chemist and would never be able to do my job from home every day of the week, but I certainly don't hold that against Apple employees who have zero to do with my own job.
I think it has something to do with the indolent, living in their gated communities and WFH with their fiber internet connections, seem to be grasping for more to make the divide between the haves and the have nots even wider. It's especially grating when they denigrate those that have to work retail because they "don't get a better job" or aren't "highly skilled". But it's always been the elitist snobs that support segregation and oppression.It appears to be because if the Apple employees 'win' then the people who are angry about it somehow 'lose,' even though it literally doesn't effect them. I don't get the logic, but it seems there's now a sizable portion of the population who's logic nowadays is specious at best. I'm a chemist and would never be able to do my job from home every day of the week, but I certainly don't hold that against Apple employees who have zero to do with my own job.
Yes, because it's the Apple developer making $150k/year that's driving the divide between the haves and have nots. It certainly couldn't be the benevolent and lowly Bezos, Musk, and Zuckerberg's of the world, with their tens of billions of dollars.I think it has something to do with the indolent, living in their gated communities and WFH with their fiber internet connections, seem to be grasping for more to make the divide between the haves and the have nots even wider. It's especially grating when they denigrate those that have to work retail because they "don't get a better job" or aren't "highly skilled". But it's always been the elitist snobs that support segregation and oppression.
bitter much with the elitest snob comments? I think so.I think it has something to do with the indolent, living in their gated communities and WFH with their fiber internet connections, seem to be grasping for more to make the divide between the haves and the have nots even wider. It's especially grating when they denigrate those that have to work retail because they "don't get a better job" or aren't "highly skilled". But it's always been the elitist snobs that support segregation and oppression.