Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Tbh if Apple allows that, their products will continue to go down hill. Take iOS 15. Very lackluster, probably because of the working home and COVID. I feel like this will just keep happening, less and less quality from them. I am a teacher, I do not have the option of begging to work from home. If my Board of Education says in person, then that’s what I have to do. Why can’t they be the same way? Just my opinion.
So because some jobs can’t be done from a home office, then no one in any job can possibly work from home or a coffee shop? That doesn’t make a lot of sense.
 
Many tech companies in the Bay Area where Apple is located have gone fully remote or are offering more expansive work from home options for their employees. Google and Facebook, for example, are letting some employees work remotely on a permanent basis.

In Santa Clara County where Apple's Apple Park and Infinite Loop campuses are located, there is once again a mask recommendation, which is not yet a mandate. Employees are correct that Delta variant cases are ramping up in California, which does have the potential to impact Apple's September return plans.
Note Santa Clara county while like many other California counties is suggesting to people to wear masks inside stores to decrease the chance of Delta variant cases, but this county has yet to see a spike on that. There is no mandate yet.

Comparisons to Google and Facebook letting their employees work remotely is not the same, as Facebook is essentially server based multi-language software environments, and to a great degree so is Google. Apple does everything, hardware and software. So dependent on what employees positions are about some of it is not doable by remote comparably. :)
 
[...]Why is everyone so eager to return to a “normal” of commuting five days a week to sit in an office doing work that could be done from everywhere. Have employees in the office a few consecutive days and leadership can stop its pearl clutching over “culture.”
There are companies big and small, in all industries, service sectors etc. One size does not fit all. Just because one thinks they can do their job at home 100% of the time, doesn't mean it's the right work environment for every other company under the sun. Some employees have taken WFH as an employee right...nothing can be further from the truth.
 
There are companies big and small, in all industries, service sectors etc. One size does not fit all. Just because one thinks they can do their job at home 100% of the time, doesn't mean it's the right work environment for every other company under the sun. Some employees have taken WFH as an employee right...nothing can be further from the truth.
The options are not full time WFH or full time in the office. A hybrid can work, assuming the leadership has the skills. Workers do have the right to request salary increases, schedule adjustments, etc. as they are trying to maximize their salary and combined benefits, just like a company has the right to try to minimize their labor costs.
 
There are companies big and small, in all industries, service sectors etc. One size does not fit all. Just because one thinks they can do their job at home 100% of the time, doesn't mean it's the right work environment for every other company under the sun. Some employees have taken WFH as an employee right...nothing can be further from the truth.
The options are not full time WFH or full time in the office. A hybrid can work, assuming the leadership has the skills. Workers do have the right to request salary increases, schedule adjustments, etc. as they are trying to maximize their salary and combined benefits, just like a company has the right to try to minimize their labor costs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
These employees should focus their energies at the real problem .... high housing prices. It's ridiculous how much homes cost these days. I've seen first-hand how realtors pad up "suggested selling prices" just to increase their own take. It's gross.

Still as long as the demand exists you can't change what housing goes for. Also you just can't have infinite housing with power and water limitations of this state.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
I can't figure it out either.

I think some people are bosses themselves and just can't handle the idea of a world without having "physical control" over people.

Others maybe are stuck at companies that aren't offering anything on the WFH front and they are a combination of jealous and angry and don't want anything good for anyone else as a result?

And finally - I think some people see this as a left/right thing and are here to troll anything even remotely progressive.

You already know what it is. A system exists with some power structure that some people benefit from. Changes to that system threaten the existing power structure. People don't want to give up their power so they resist changes to the existing system. Tale as old as time.

Alternatively people think others should go through the same buy-in process they had to go through to get to where they are in life. Reminds me of "we shouldn't forgive student debt because I had to pay it."
 
Why? My work sold its headquarters, made tons of money, and remained productive throughout 2020. They demanded all managers come back to the office only to offer a hybrid solution a few months later. It’s a great benefit. Why is everyone so eager to return to a “normal” of commuting five days a week to sit in an office doing work that could be done from everywhere. Have employees in the office a few consecutive days and leadership can stop its pearl clutching over “culture.”
The company I work for is doing a crap job at the hybrid work model in most ways, but it has identified an entire department that will be remote forever and allowed them to stop leasing a building in SF that was $46k per month.
 
The options are not full time WFH or full time in the office. A hybrid can work,
Sure a hybrid approach.
assuming the leadership has the skills.
I'm going to assume Tim Cook is not masquerading as a MR poster. It's irrelevant what one thinks of management or their skills, they are free to leave if the job at hand is not a "dream job". Nobody is forcing anybody to work for any company and conversely companies are under no obligation to keep employees that don't perform to their satisfaction.
Workers do have the right to request salary increases, schedule adjustments, etc. as they are trying to maximize their salary and combined benefits, just like a company has the right to try to minimize their labor costs.
Yes they do. 100%. A company also has a right to turn them down. One would hope that companies in 2021 are a little more flexible, but that flexibility needs to extend to employees also.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
If that were the case, you go to HR or your manager and see if they want to make a counter offer. If not, you take the new offer. That's a very one on one thing and doesn't require a mild rebellion with open letters, petitions and whatnot.
In a perfect world. But when the decision for remote work is many levels about your manager and HR rep, you end up with situations like this...
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
The cynic in me who did not have the option to work from home (because my job simply CAN'T be done at home) and instead did 55+ hours a week with a severe lack of PPE...says get over it.

The other side of me says did Apple not see this coming?
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
Their approach to this is all wrong. They should sell this as "we are committed to improving and helping the globe" /s but also serious about the commenting. However, I am not taking a side on what they are discussing. All I can say is I've done long commutes before and it was for a long time. I knew what I was signing myself up for....
 
Their approach to this is all wrong. They should sell this as "we are committed to improving and helping the globe" /s but also serious about the commenting. However, I am not taking a side on what they are discussing. All I can say is I've done long commutes before and it was for a long time. I knew what I was signing myself up for....

We also used to have 14 hour workdays and no workplace safety. When you find a better way of doing something, you change.
 
The cynic in me who did not have the option to work from home (because my job simply CAN'T be done at home) and instead did 55+ hours a week with a severe lack of PPE...says get over it.

The other side of me says did Apple not see this coming?

Apple has been around for 40+ years. With respect to employee dynamics I suspect they've seen a lot over that time period.

Those people that need to work at home should seek employment with companies that offer that option. If they're as highly qualified as some here suggest, it should be easy.

Those that are threatening to quit should be allowed to leave with Apple's thanks and best wishes.

A win for those employees and a win for Apple!
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.