"Campus Culture" at work was never a good idea, and it's good to see most people think it's well past being killed off. Work is work--not an extension of college.
So because some jobs can’t be done from a home office, then no one in any job can possibly work from home or a coffee shop? That doesn’t make a lot of sense.Tbh if Apple allows that, their products will continue to go down hill. Take iOS 15. Very lackluster, probably because of the working home and COVID. I feel like this will just keep happening, less and less quality from them. I am a teacher, I do not have the option of begging to work from home. If my Board of Education says in person, then that’s what I have to do. Why can’t they be the same way? Just my opinion.
Note Santa Clara county while like many other California counties is suggesting to people to wear masks inside stores to decrease the chance of Delta variant cases, but this county has yet to see a spike on that. There is no mandate yet.Many tech companies in the Bay Area where Apple is located have gone fully remote or are offering more expansive work from home options for their employees. Google and Facebook, for example, are letting some employees work remotely on a permanent basis.
In Santa Clara County where Apple's Apple Park and Infinite Loop campuses are located, there is once again a mask recommendation, which is not yet a mandate. Employees are correct that Delta variant cases are ramping up in California, which does have the potential to impact Apple's September return plans.
There are companies big and small, in all industries, service sectors etc. One size does not fit all. Just because one thinks they can do their job at home 100% of the time, doesn't mean it's the right work environment for every other company under the sun. Some employees have taken WFH as an employee right...nothing can be further from the truth.[...]Why is everyone so eager to return to a “normal” of commuting five days a week to sit in an office doing work that could be done from everywhere. Have employees in the office a few consecutive days and leadership can stop its pearl clutching over “culture.”
You get what you pay for
The options are not full time WFH or full time in the office. A hybrid can work, assuming the leadership has the skills. Workers do have the right to request salary increases, schedule adjustments, etc. as they are trying to maximize their salary and combined benefits, just like a company has the right to try to minimize their labor costs.There are companies big and small, in all industries, service sectors etc. One size does not fit all. Just because one thinks they can do their job at home 100% of the time, doesn't mean it's the right work environment for every other company under the sun. Some employees have taken WFH as an employee right...nothing can be further from the truth.
The options are not full time WFH or full time in the office. A hybrid can work, assuming the leadership has the skills. Workers do have the right to request salary increases, schedule adjustments, etc. as they are trying to maximize their salary and combined benefits, just like a company has the right to try to minimize their labor costs.There are companies big and small, in all industries, service sectors etc. One size does not fit all. Just because one thinks they can do their job at home 100% of the time, doesn't mean it's the right work environment for every other company under the sun. Some employees have taken WFH as an employee right...nothing can be further from the truth.
Yeah, but those 10 people comprise the entire executive committee! They really are doomed!"Approximately 10 people from the Slack channel have claimed they are planning to quit if forced to return from the office".
Apple is doomed.
These employees should focus their energies at the real problem .... high housing prices. It's ridiculous how much homes cost these days. I've seen first-hand how realtors pad up "suggested selling prices" just to increase their own take. It's gross.
I can't figure it out either.
I think some people are bosses themselves and just can't handle the idea of a world without having "physical control" over people.
Others maybe are stuck at companies that aren't offering anything on the WFH front and they are a combination of jealous and angry and don't want anything good for anyone else as a result?
And finally - I think some people see this as a left/right thing and are here to troll anything even remotely progressive.
The company I work for is doing a crap job at the hybrid work model in most ways, but it has identified an entire department that will be remote forever and allowed them to stop leasing a building in SF that was $46k per month.Why? My work sold its headquarters, made tons of money, and remained productive throughout 2020. They demanded all managers come back to the office only to offer a hybrid solution a few months later. It’s a great benefit. Why is everyone so eager to return to a “normal” of commuting five days a week to sit in an office doing work that could be done from everywhere. Have employees in the office a few consecutive days and leadership can stop its pearl clutching over “culture.”
Sure a hybrid approach.The options are not full time WFH or full time in the office. A hybrid can work,
I'm going to assume Tim Cook is not masquerading as a MR poster. It's irrelevant what one thinks of management or their skills, they are free to leave if the job at hand is not a "dream job". Nobody is forcing anybody to work for any company and conversely companies are under no obligation to keep employees that don't perform to their satisfaction.assuming the leadership has the skills.
Yes they do. 100%. A company also has a right to turn them down. One would hope that companies in 2021 are a little more flexible, but that flexibility needs to extend to employees also.Workers do have the right to request salary increases, schedule adjustments, etc. as they are trying to maximize their salary and combined benefits, just like a company has the right to try to minimize their labor costs.
I love the "fire em all" contingent. Like the sports fan who wants the entire coaching staff fired when they lose one game.
Because highly skilled engineers and programmers grow on trees.
In a perfect world. But when the decision for remote work is many levels about your manager and HR rep, you end up with situations like this...If that were the case, you go to HR or your manager and see if they want to make a counter offer. If not, you take the new offer. That's a very one on one thing and doesn't require a mild rebellion with open letters, petitions and whatnot.
Apple employees need to get over it...I've been in my office since June 2020.
Those highly skilled engineers unhappy with Apple's working requirements should seek other employment.
A win for them and a win for Apple.
I feel like half the replies are that sort of response.So...you couldn't have it, so others shouldn't either?
You already know what it is. A system exists with some power structure that some people benefit from. Changes to that system threaten the existing power structure.
Their approach to this is all wrong. They should sell this as "we are committed to improving and helping the globe" /s but also serious about the commenting. However, I am not taking a side on what they are discussing. All I can say is I've done long commutes before and it was for a long time. I knew what I was signing myself up for....
The cynic in me who did not have the option to work from home (because my job simply CAN'T be done at home) and instead did 55+ hours a week with a severe lack of PPE...says get over it.
The other side of me says did Apple not see this coming?