Max 16G RAM. My 8 year old mini has 16G of RAM. I wish someone could explain that
Sounds like someone got mad at my comments. lolYeah.....you're right.....you are very confused.
Yup. These are definitely replacements for the low end part of the lineup, for people who live 100% in the apple sandbox. Basically they're macs for iphone users. Impressive yes, and a nice start. But there's a lot more work needed to build a true 'power user' machine (edit to change from pro, to avoid starting the who's a pro conversation all over again).An application requiring 64GB isn’t suddenly going to work with 16GB, the same applies for other values.
I saw an Air, Pro, and Mini with a new M1 processor. You didn't see those?They showed nothing.
Doubt they will. They purposefully compared the M1 to old Intel chips (like the Mac mini against the 4 core/4thread i5 from years ago) and old Intel iGPUsIt will be funny if a MBA ends up being faster than the MBP 16". But let's for real world benchmarks.
Tim Cook simply will never have a "One More Thing" in him. That's for sure.
The 2+4 on an iPhone XR work together. No reason why these wouldn't. However, the four power saving cores _are_ power saving.So it’s a 4+4 core design (BIGsmall), can those 8 total cores work together?
And all I really wanted was the 'Tags, too.So it's over. no Air Tags
RAM absolutely matters. I'm a developer, and need more than 16 GB RAM to run multiple VM's. I'm also a musician who works with large sample libraries. 32 GB is the absolute minimum needed for these use cases, with 64 GB a much better choice. The old Mini's could do that. The new ones only go to 1/4 of what the old ones could support?!?Good: You can do anything on a MacBook Air now. For the same price. Battery life is amazing on these. Your RAM isn't really going to matter with these chips, I don't think some of you get it who are complaining about 16gb of RAM.
Bad: No re-designs. No iMac.
Hmmm, missed the mark there pacha, better reapply at the academy as your investigative skills are about as good as a soft banana.You must be very young then. This was a riff off of the "iconic" (and very effective) Mac Vs. PC commercials. For a nerd like you they may not be effective, but to the average idiot they are.
Agreed. They purposefully avoided comparing the GPU to dGPUs - they aren't ready for the higher-end Pro machines yetYup. These are definitely replacements for the low end part of the lineup, for people who live 100% in the apple sandbox. Basically they're macs for iphone users. Impressive yes, and a nice start. But there's a lot more work needed to build a true 'pro' machine.
I have always said my Mac was too slow at Machine Learning to make me productive to my employers.
Never going to happen. They are moving to ARM so it will be much more difficult to compare.Pretty underwhelming. I am waiting for a comparison against Ryzen 4800U.
They'll likely update after Big Sur is released.Big sur is coming out Nov 12 yet Final Cut Pro and logic pro X didn't receive an update to be be fully compatible with Big Sur, How is this possible?
I saw Final Cut and Logic with new icons on their website just now on the Macbook Pro 13 inch page but wheres the actual update?
No I'm good, my 2020 MBP with its four USB-C ports and VM-supporting processor are just fine, thanks.Well if this was such a bad experience for you Dell's new innovation crap is just a web surf away.