I don’t think this is about hardware. It’s about the OS and service infrastructure behind it. And none of us own that except for Apple. We merely have a licence to use it.That’s the problem. It’s OUR hardware. Not apples.
I don’t think this is about hardware. It’s about the OS and service infrastructure behind it. And none of us own that except for Apple. We merely have a licence to use it.That’s the problem. It’s OUR hardware. Not apples.
Can someone explain to me how Sony, Microsoft, Nintendo, etc have handled this type of situation on their stores? How do their stores differ from Apples?
Apple sells devices which consist of a combination of hardware and software. Once a device is sold, the user owns it, not Apple. Third parties then sell further software to the user, to be run on said device. At that point, Apple shouldn’t be involved anymore at all.Apple spends $26 billion a year on R&D to create this valuable platform that developers want to be a part of, but dont want to pay what Apple asks? Do I have that right?
But it is not your software.That’s the problem. It’s OUR hardware. Not apples.
Read the emails. Specifically this section mentions that exactly from Phil
So all Macrumors has to do is get big enough, and then the E.U. will force them to provide access to anyone no matter how badly they behave.Why don't you break the Terms & Services of MacRumors a few times and see if the mods don't ban you from this website.
You do not own the operating system that makes your phone work; Apple does.Apple sells devices which consist of a combination of hardware and software. Once a device is sold, the user owns it, not Apple. Third parties then sell further software to the user, to be run on said device. At that point, Apple shouldn’t be involved anymore at all.
And people will say that Apple doesn't gatekeep iOS apps...
Apple today said it has terminated Epic Games Sweden's developer account worldwide due to the game developer's pattern of untrustworthy behavior.
![]()
Apple shared the following statement with MacRumors:In a letter sent to Epic, lawyers representing Apple said that Epic has proven to be "verifiably untrustworthy." Apple said it cannot be assured that Epic will follow the Apple Developer Program's terms and conditions in the future.
Epic said that it had intended to use the Swedish account to launch an Epic Games Store on iOS in the EU, and this would have brought the Fortnite app back to the iPhone. Starting with iOS 17.4, Apple allows alternative app marketplaces on the iPhone in the EU, as part of its compliance with the Digital Markets Act.
In a press release, Epic said that Apple terminating the Swedish developer account is a "serious violation" of the Digital Markets Act, and "shows Apple has no intention of allowing true competition on iOS devices."
More from Epic's response:Epic believes that Apple suspended its Swedish developer account in part due to Epic CEO Tim Sweeney's public criticism of Apple's proposed Digital Markets Act compliance plans. Epic shared a letter it received from the App Store's chief Phil Schiller, who indeed said that Sweeney's "colorful criticism" of Apple's plans, but also Epic's history of "intentionally violating contractual provisions with which it disagrees," strongly suggest that Epic does not intend to follow the Apple Developer Program rules if reinstated.
The legal battle between the two companies began in 2020, after Apple removed Fortnite from the App Store on the iPhone due to Epic introducing a direct payment option in the app for the in-game currency V-Bucks, in defiance of the App Store rules. In what appears to have been an orchestrated move, Epic promptly filed a lawsuit against Apple, accusing the company of anti-competitive behavior.
Apple had already terminated one of Epic's other developer accounts in 2020 after the company violated the App Store's rules with its Fortnite stunt.
Epic continues to litigate against Apple in both the U.S. and Australia, and it appears that the highly-publicized legal battle is far from over.
Article Link: Apple Explains Why It Terminated Epic's Latest Developer Account
In case the terms of the contract are unlawful, then yes, you can.You can ignore a contract you willingly signed in the EU? Interesting place to do business.
If that's the case (which it isn't in the EU) then I'd like Apple to provide a way to install another OS on my hardware.You do not own the operating system that makes your phone work; Apple does.
Game consoles are not marketed as general purpose computers. Smartphones are.Can someone explain to me how Sony, Microsoft, Nintendo, etc have handled this type of situation on their stores? How do their stores differ from Apples?
Did they, though?Apple Explains Why It Terminated Epic's Latest Developer Account
And nobody is saying that you shouldn't have the choice to utilize that service. They are just saying that you should have the choice not to utilize that service.The ease of use of the Apple App Store is miles better than anything that came before it. . . for $99 and the cost of development tools, I could sell an app with literally no additional out of pocket expenses. I would not need to pay for payment systems, distribution, refunds, a storefront, servers et al. I could be in business for under $2000 if I chose. No business opportunity in history, except perhaps some network marketing businesses, was this simple, inexpensive, and with global scope. IMO, the developers have been getting a bargain compared to the toils and tribulations of owning a traditional business. Or even the software business before the iOS store.
You got your store. Now have fun developing your own developer tools. See you on IOS in a few years again-Shocker. You aren’t entitled to live in someone else’s store lololol.
Consumers do not own the software on the iPhone...Apple sells devices which consist of a combination of hardware and software. Once a device is sold, the user owns it, not Apple. Third parties then sell further software to the user, to be run on said device. At that point, Apple shouldn’t be involved anymore at all.
I'm a bit unclear on what verdict you're referring to. Is that in the EU or US?I’m not sure. Apple already has a verdict of the courts backing them up.
Even if you want to open a third party store, you still need an Apple account and agree to their terms. It’s not like third party stores are the wild Wild West where everything goes.
So if they have a verdict confirming Epic doesn’t play by the rules, this just might hold up.
Apple sell the hardware title and they sell a software licence. The user never owns the software. They merely licence it. Third parties also do not sell further software. They sell a licence to it. It might be for a one off fee or a subscription, but it is a licence, not title. Apple are entitled to remain involved through the whole process because that is what it says in the hardware conditions of sale, and the licence agreements for the various softwares.Apple sells devices which consist of a combination of hardware and software. Once a device is sold, the user owns it, not Apple. Third parties then sell further software to the user, to be run on said device. At that point, Apple shouldn’t be involved anymore at all.
Read your TOS. That hardware has a license of OS X on it. You don't own the right to install OS X on it but a temporary user supported license on it that runs out (8 years or more considering Apple's supported hardware history), so go install Linux on it and discover you own no power over the GPL either.That’s the problem. It’s OUR hardware. Not apples.
Thats even more interesting. No due process. Huh.In case the terms of the contract are unlawful, then yes, you can.
Well then this leads in to there should be no developer agreement at all. If you don’t follow an agreement but are still protected. That’s major overreaching for the government. Also should the government be able to force any company to do business with another?Both. It's a very dangerous move for Apple since it basically constitutes exactly the kind of "gatekeeping" the DMA provisions are meant to prevent.
The only way Apple can justify this is with the clause that allows the Gatekeeper to protect the security of the platform, but the measures enacted needs to be "strictly necessary and proportionate" and I highly doubt the regulators would buy that argument.
That ex- that just won’t let it go…
Apple today said it has terminated Epic Games Sweden's developer account worldwide due to the game developer's pattern of untrustworthy behavior.
![]()
Apple shared the following statement with MacRumors:In a letter sent to Epic, lawyers representing Apple said that Epic has proven to be "verifiably untrustworthy." Apple said it cannot be assured that Epic will follow the Apple Developer Program's terms and conditions in the future.
Epic said that it had intended to use the Swedish account to launch an Epic Games Store on iOS in the EU, and this would have brought the Fortnite app back to the iPhone. Starting with iOS 17.4, Apple allows alternative app marketplaces on the iPhone in the EU, as part of its compliance with the Digital Markets Act.
In a press release, Epic said that Apple terminating the Swedish developer account is a "serious violation" of the Digital Markets Act, and "shows Apple has no intention of allowing true competition on iOS devices."
More from Epic's response:Epic believes that Apple suspended its Swedish developer account in part due to Epic CEO Tim Sweeney's public criticism of Apple's proposed Digital Markets Act compliance plans. Epic shared a letter it received from the App Store's chief Phil Schiller, who indeed said that Sweeney's "colorful criticism" of Apple's plans, but also Epic's history of "intentionally violating contractual provisions with which it disagrees," strongly suggest that Epic does not intend to follow the Apple Developer Program rules if reinstated.
The legal battle between the two companies began in 2020, after Apple removed Fortnite from the App Store on the iPhone due to Epic introducing a direct payment option in the app for the in-game currency V-Bucks, in defiance of the App Store rules. In what appears to have been an orchestrated move, Epic promptly filed a lawsuit against Apple, accusing the company of anti-competitive behavior.
Apple had already terminated one of Epic's other developer accounts in 2020 after the company violated the App Store's rules with its Fortnite stunt.
Epic continues to litigate against Apple in both the U.S. and Australia, and it appears that the highly-publicized legal battle is far from over.
Article Link: Apple Explains Why It Terminated Epic's Latest Developer Account
Consumers do not own the software on the iPhone...
Who cares. The E.U. cannot force Apple to do business with anyone.Apple is quoting a ruling from 2021, which was about a completely different thing and not even by the EU.
In the ruling, Judge Rogers says that Apple was lawful in its decision to terminate Epic’s developer account last year when it added the Fortnite direct payment option.
If I understood the article correctly, Apple revoked access to a developer account on EU soil (Sweden)